Inspection on 20/05/10 for Seely Hirst House Care Home
Also see our care home review for Seely Hirst House Care Home for more information
This is the latest available inspection report for this service, carried out on 20th May 2010.
CQC found this care home to be providing an Excellent service.
The inspector found no outstanding requirements from the previous inspection report, but made 1 statutory requirements (actions the home must comply with) as a result of this inspection.
Other inspections for this house
Seely Hirst House Care Home 21/08/06
Seely Hirst House Care Home 19/01/06
Seely Hirst House Care Home 10/08/05
Seely Hirst House Care Home 12/01/05
Seely Hirst House Care Home 25/08/04
Seely Hirst House Care Home 24/03/04
Similar services:
What follows are excerpts from this inspection report. For more information read the full report on the next tab.
What the care home does well
Seely Hirst House care home is a well managed environment for people to live in. The accommodation is kept tidy and well presented. Staff work hard to provide care and assistance to the people who live there and although agency staff are being used on a regular basis to provide cover there is a main group of staff who have worked at the home for a long time to ensure consistency in care. Comments from people at the home included:The home provides excellent care and looks after me really well.` `The home is kept clean and comfortable. The staff are very friendly, caring, nothing is too much trouble for them to do for you. My bedroom is really cosy, warm and clean. I am very comfortable and happy here and I have no complaints`. There is an effective alarm sensor in each person`s bedroom. This system alerts staff when someone enters the bedroom, leaves the room or moves around in the bedroom. In this way staff are quickly alerted to people who may need help. We observed staff moving people from the lounge to the dining room for lunch. People were encouraged to walk alongside staff, transferred safely to wheel chairs by hoist or assisted to their feet with the use of a standing aid. This was well conducted and carefully done providing people with dignity as they done so.(Skirts pulled down, cushions repositioned to make comfortable etc). Most of the times foot plates were applied to protect people`s feet during transport. Two members of staff gave out the medicines at lunch time to separate areas of the home. When giving out people`s medicines they wore a tabbard to show people that during this time they were concentrating on medicines and should not be disturbed unless it was related to medicines. Medicines are correctly managed. Staff continue to receive an effective induction process and agency staff report that they are never asked to carry out tasks alone and are made welcome by the friendly staff who work along side them. There are policies in place to ensure the safety of the people who live and work at the home. Relatives that spoke with us said that they thought care provided to their relative was good and that they had no concerns about the care. `There is a happy atmosphere at the home.` We spoke with relatives who said that they felt able to raise any concerns that they may have through the senior staff at the home and knew that they would be taken seriously and acted on. People said that they knew how to make a complaint. A copy of the complaints procedures is displayed in the entrance to the home and is also available in the service user guide. We spoke with six staff members, they were able to demonstrate their awareness of safeguarding issues. This means that they would know how to respond if they saw someone at the home being placed at risk. Staff also told us that they were aware that if problems were not resolved by the organisation they could alert the external agencies that includes the Police, Social Services or the Care Quality Commission with their unresolved concern about care at the home. The Annual Quality Assurance tells us that: `Residents are safeguarded from all forms of abuse by training all staff in adult abuse protection and safeguarding. Recruiting staff in line with our policies and procedures,conducting reference checks, Vulnerable adult first checks and enhanced Criminal Records Bureau checks. Fully inducting new staff members into post using the common induction standards. There is regular supervision of staff. There is a whistle blowing, grievance and disciplinary policy that staff have access to and are fully aware of`. People at the home are involved in the recruitment process of staff and there are regular meetings held for the people who live at the home, and for staff to express their views and concerns. This forms part of the quality assurance feed back provided by the home.
What the care home could do better:
An initial risk assessment of people`s needs is in place but some of the risk assessments and evaluations no longer accurately reflect people`s current needs. However, care provided does not appear to have suffered and people told us they felt happy and safe in this home. We checked accident records and saw that staff reacted and recorded this information appropriately to help people. Incidents recorded were not always easy find as they were included in the daily diary or handover information so that at a later date they would be less easy to find to check patterns arising from them to prevent further incidents. At the care home we noticed that people looked well presented and one person told us that the hairdresser visits on a regular basis. We noticed that some women had facial hair. This is an area that has been overlooked and spoils the presentation of some women at the home. After meals we noticed that one person left the table and was later seen with food markings around their mouth. Some one else said that they would have liked to return to their bedroom to clean their teeth after lunch time but felt the staff were too busy and did not want to ask them. It is important for staff to remember to check that each person at the home is regularly asked if they are in need of any help. We noticed that there was a long gap between the first course of the meal and the second course. We noticed that people who wander would in time need better supervision at meal times. Not all room doors are labelled to identify who lives in them and not all staff wore their name badges at inspection. This is an area where the manager may choose to review.