Inspection on 20/05/10 for Woburn Sands Lodge
Also see our care home review for Woburn Sands Lodge for more information
This is the latest available inspection report for this service, carried out on 20th May 2010.
CQC found this care home to be providing an Good service.
The inspector found no outstanding requirements from the previous inspection report, but made 3 statutory requirements (actions the home must comply with) as a result of this inspection.
Other inspections for this house
Similar services:
What follows are excerpts from this inspection report. For more information read the full report on the next tab.
What the care home does well
Residents plans included a range of care plans to address needs in relation to their mental, physical health,personal care and social care needs. Care plans were person centred, detailed and specific as to how staff support residents to meet those needs whilst promoting their involvement and independence. They showed evidence of resident involvement in their development and were kept up to date and reviewed monthly. Care plans included records of one to one sessions with individuals with residents confirming that staff are always available to talk and offer support when required. The care plans included a risk assessment with a detailed risk management plan in place to address each identified risk. These were dated and signed by the resident and staff. They showed evidence of being reviewed three monthly or sooner where this was required. Alongside this the care plans included a moving and handling risk assessment and waterlow assessment. The home has a missing person policy in place to support staff in managing such situations. Care plans outlined the support required in meeting personal and health care needs and the support required in attending health appointment.The care plans viewed included appointment letters with relevant health professionals and evidence of regular care programme approach review meetings. At the time of the inspection the home had three residents who were self medicating under supervision. For all of the other residents staff administer their medication. Qualified nurses are responsible for the ordering, receipt, disposal , storage and administration of medication. The registered manager confirmed that the nurses have attended the National Pharmaceutical approved training with certificates of this training available for only some of the nurses working at the home. The medication administration records showed no gaps in administration of prescribed medication. The registered manager carries out monthly audits of medication with records maintained to support this.This monitoring is increased if issues are found. The supplying pharmacy do not carryout advisory visits and this should be addressed with them. The registered manager confirmed after the inspection that she had contacted the pharmacy to set this up. The home has a complaints procedure which is accessible to residents and staff. Residents fed back in surveys that they know how to make a complaint and residents spoken with during the inspection confirmed this. Staff spoken with confirmed that they know what to do if a resident made a complaint to them. Records of complaints are maintained and no complaints have been received since January 2009. The Commission have received no complaints in respect of this service. The home has a safeguarding and whistle blowing policy in place with a copy of the whistle blowing policy included in staff personnel files and signed by them. The home has a copy of the Local Authority safeguarding procedure with a flow chart on the notice board in the office to reinforce to staff action to be taken. Staff spoken with were clear of their responsibility to report bad practice. The staff on duty confirmed that they had completed the on line safeguarding training.One of the staff had also attended formal safeguarding training and the new staff member was booked to go on this course. The bank nurse on duty confirmed she had this training through her full time employer but no training record was on file to support this. Allegations of potential safeguarding incidents are handled appropriately and the home has had three safeguarding referrals and investigations during the period 2009. The communal areas of the home viewed were clean, homely and comfortable with a new carpet recently fitted throughout. Residents are supported and encouraged to take responsibility for the up keep of their bedrooms and personal space. Staff recruitment files viewed evidences that recruitment practices are robust which safeguards service users. The home is adequately staffed with four staff on daytime shifts and two waking night staff. The home has two cooks and a cleaner, with the cleaner post vacant at the time of the inspection. The registered manager works a mix of shifts and administration shifts. Staff feel that staffing levels are sufficient and residents confirmed that there is always staff available to meet their needs. Staff have access to formal mandatory, specialist training and on line training. The registered manager is actively involved with the Local Council in obtaining bids for specific training. The registered manager is qualified and experienced. Staff and residents fed back that the home is well managed and that the manager is approachable and accessible. Staff confirmed they feel supported despite not been regularly supervised and they can approach the manager for support and advice at any time. The registered manager carries out residents, relatives and professionals surveys to improve the service provided, however the results are not collated into a report to demonstrate that any issues raised are properly addressed. Staff are proactive in supporting service users with college and work placements and service users certificates of achievements are displayed in the nursing office to evidence those achievements.
What the care home could do better:
Service user health appointments are recorded in the diary, however a separate individual records of appointments with health professionals should be put in place to make access to this information more accessible. The correct code should be used on medication administration records to accurately reflect that a resident is on leave and had taken their medication on leave as opposed to being absent from the home. The home has a high number of medication records which were hand written and not printed by the supplying pharmacy. The registered manager confirmed after the inspection that this had been addressed with the supplying pharmacy. Residents are prescribed "as required medication", with some residents prescribed more than one for similar behaviours. Guidelines must be put in place as to why and when the "as required medication" is to be administered and if both "as required" medications can be administered at the same time to safeguard residents. During discussion it was confirmed that staff secondary dispense medication for leave, including planned leave. This is not considered safe or best practice and must be addressed with the supplying pharmacy for medications to be supplied by them for planned leave to safeguard residents. For unplanned leave a written procedure must be put in place for any medication transfers to be made to safeguard residents. A summary of complaints and safeguarding referrals should be maintained to include the date of the complaint, nature of the complaint , action taken and outcome. This will allow for monitoring of complaints and safeguarding. The staff supervision matrix indicates gaps in supervisions. The registered manager had identified that supervision was not taking place regularly.The manager has completed a supervision and management course and has introduced informal feedback sessions to be recorded as supervision. Some records were viewed to evidence this but the benefits and frequency must be reviewed and monitored to ensure that staff are supervised on a more regular basis. Induction, training and supervision records should be reorganised and made more accessible to fully demonstrate that staff are suitably inducted, trained and supervised to safeguard service users. During the inspection a new staff member on a POVA first went out with a service user unsupervised. This was because they had received their copy of their criminal records bureau check, which at that time was not on file. This was fed back to the registered manager to address. The registered manager confirmed after the inspection that the staff member had told staff on duty that they had received their copy of their criminal records bureau check as was the case, so the staff nurse on duty assumed that individual could now work unsupervised. The registered manager confirmed this has been addressed with staff concerned and she has reinforced in the communication book the rules around working on a POVA first. This needs to be maintained and effectively monitored tosafeguard residents. The manager confirmed that regulation 26 visits take place 4 to 6 weekly. Handwritten notes for a visit which took place on the 9/11/09 was made available. Following the inspection copies of regulation 26 visit reports were sent to the Commission for Dec 2009, Jan and February 2010. These were not fully completed to indicate the time and length of time in service. The registered provider must ensure that systems are in place to ensure that the home is being effectively monitored to safeguard residents, with reports maintained at the home to evidence this. An annual health and safety audit is carried out by a consultancy service annually. There are no others forms of quality monitoring taking place and the Provider needs to consider how this will be addressed and improved on. The registered manager confirmed after the inspection that audits take place on personal finance, management files, staff files, complaints, compliments, housekeeping, laundry, maintenance, kitchen, careplans and medication.