Please wait

Please note that the information on this website is now out of date. It is planned that we will update and relaunch, but for now is of historical interest only and we suggest you visit cqc.org.uk

Inspection on 19/12/05 for Chandos House

Also see our care home review for Chandos House for more information

This inspection was carried out on 19th December 2005.

CSCI has not published a star rating for this report, though using similar criteria we estimate that the report is Good. The way we rate inspection reports is consistent for all houses, though please be aware that this may be different from an official CSCI judgement.

The inspector made no statutory requirements on the home as a result of this inspection and there were no outstanding actions from the previous inspection report.

What follows are excerpts from this inspection report. For more information read the full report on the next tab.

What the care home does well

A wealth of information about the home is available, including the quarterly `inhouse` magazine. The staff group are well trained and knowledgeable about the needs of the residents. The building is decorated and generally maintained to a high standard internally; bathrooms and toilets in particular are made homely with the use of pictures, plants and curtains. . Residents made many positive comments about the home during the inspection; one resident said `I`m a person here` and a visitor described how she had visited other homes in the area and found this home to be the best. The home has a comprehensive self-audit system and has the ISO 900 Award and the Investors in People Award.

What has improved since the last inspection?

What the care home could do better:

The menu could be better displayed on the menu board and should include the alternative to the main meal.

CARE HOMES FOR OLDER PEOPLE Chandos House Gorse Road Grantham Lincs NG31 9LH Lead Inspector Julie Western Unannounced Inspection 19th December 2005 09:30 X10015.doc Version 1.40 Page 1 The Commission for Social Care Inspection aims to: • • • • Put the people who use social care first Improve services and stamp out bad practice Be an expert voice on social care Practise what we preach in our own organisation Reader Information Document Purpose Author Audience Further copies from Copyright Inspection Report CSCI General Public 0870 240 7535 (telephone order line) This report is copyright Commission for Social Care Inspection (CSCI) and may only be used in its entirety. Extracts may not be used or reproduced without the express permission of CSCI www.csci.org.uk Internet address Chandos House DS0000002344.V273979.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 2 This is a report of an inspection to assess whether services are meeting the needs of people who use them. The legal basis for conducting inspections is the Care Standards Act 2000 and the relevant National Minimum Standards for this establishment are those for Care Homes for Older People. They can be found at www.dh.gov.uk or obtained from The Stationery Office (TSO) PO Box 29, St Crispins, Duke Street, Norwich, NR3 1GN. Tel: 0870 600 5522. Online ordering: www.tso.co.uk/bookshop This report is a public document. Extracts may not be used or reproduced without the prior permission of the Commission for Social Care Inspection. Chandos House DS0000002344.V273979.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 3 SERVICE INFORMATION Name of service Chandos House Address Gorse Road Grantham Lincs NG31 9LH Telephone number Fax number Email address Provider Web address Name of registered provider(s)/company (if applicable) Name of registered manager (if applicable) Type of registration No. of places registered (if applicable) 01476 562393 The Orders Of St John Care Trust Miss J Garrill Care Home 33 Category(ies) of Old age, not falling within any other category registration, with number (33) of places Chandos House DS0000002344.V273979.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 4 SERVICE INFORMATION Conditions of registration: Date of last inspection 14th July 2005 Brief Description of the Service: Chandos House is a purpose-built home for up to 37 older people, which was formerly owned by the local Authority and is now owned by the Orders of St. John Care Trust, who manage a group of 16 homes across the county. The care home is situated in a quiet residential area to the north east of the town of Grantham. There are some limited local amenities available in the area. The town centre is not within walking distance but there are various forms of transport available to facilitate easy access. The home, a former Local Authority provision, was purpose built to admit older people. It has large landscaped gardens and on-site car parking. Accommodation for service users is available on the ground floor and the first floor, with access to the first floor being via stairs or a shaft lift. The home provides permanent and respite care for up to 33 older persons and at the time of the inspection, 31 people were being accommodated. The registered manager was present for the majority of the inspection. Chandos House DS0000002344.V273979.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 5 SUMMARY This is an overview of what the inspector found during the inspection. This inspection was unannounced and took place over 5 hours. A partial tour of the building took place and care records were inspected. The main method of inspection used was called ‘case-tracking’; this involved selecting three residents and tracking the care they received through the checking of their records, discussions with residents and care staff and observation of practices. Some policies and procedures were examined and records concerning the safety of the home were also seen. Four of the 32 residents, six care and ancillary staff and two visitors were spoken with. The Manager was present throughout the inspection. What the service does well: What has improved since the last inspection? The rolling maintenance programme was still in progress, 2 bedrooms having been recently redecorated. The lounge carpet had also been renewed. A second hoist had been purchased in the light of the changing needs of residents. There has been an improvement in record keeping. The home now employs an activities organiser for 12 ½ hours weekly. Chandos House DS0000002344.V273979.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 6 What they could do better: Please contact the provider for advice of actions taken in response to this inspection. The report of this inspection is available from enquiries@csci.gsi.gov.uk or by contacting your local CSCI office. Chandos House DS0000002344.V273979.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 7 DETAILS OF INSPECTOR FINDINGS CONTENTS Choice of Home (Standards 1–6) Health and Personal Care (Standards 7-11) Daily Life and Social Activities (Standards 12-15) Complaints and Protection (Standards 16-18) Environment (Standards 19-26) Staffing (Standards 27-30) Management and Administration (Standards 31-38) Scoring of Outcomes Statutory Requirements Identified During the Inspection Chandos House DS0000002344.V273979.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 8 Choice of Home The intended outcomes for Standards 1 – 6 are: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Prospective service users have the information they need to make an informed choice about where to live. Each service user has a written contract/ statement of terms and conditions with the home. No service user moves into the home without having had his/her needs assessed and been assured that these will be met. Service users and their representatives know that the home they enter will meet their needs. Prospective service users and their relatives and friends have an opportunity to visit and assess the quality, facilities and suitability of the home. Service users assessed and referred solely for intermediate care are helped to maximise their independence and return home. The Commission considers Standards 3 and 6 the key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): 1,2,5 The home clearly sets out what it intends to do for its residents and this information is freely available to residents. A comprehensive initial assessment ensures that the needs of residents can be met. Prospective residents are encouraged to take time before making the decision to move into the home on a permanent basis. EVIDENCE: The statement of purpose was examined and was very comprehensive. It contained two inspection reports. The Manager said a copy of the statement of purpose was in the brochure pack, which was sent or given to all prospective residents or their families. The pack included a copy of the residents’ handbook and a copy of the latest Orders of St. John Care Trust quarterly magazine. Prospective residents were given a chance to experience life in a residential care home, spending a day and having meals in the home; one visitor, who said of her friend ‘she’ll now have a life’, described how the friend had been to the home on more than one occasion before permanent admission two weeks ago. Chandos House DS0000002344.V273979.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 9 Health and Personal Care The intended outcomes for Standards 7 – 11 are: 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. The service user’s health, personal and social care needs are set out in an individual plan of care. Service users’ health care needs are fully met. Service users, where appropriate, are responsible for their own medication, and are protected by the home’s policies and procedures for dealing with medicines. Service users feel they are treated with respect and their right to privacy is upheld. Service users are assured that at the time of their death, staff will treat them and their family with care, sensitivity and respect. The Commission considers Standards 7, 8, 9 and 10 the key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): 7-9, 11 The home’s records give a clear indication of the needs of residents and enable staff to meet their needs with sensitivity and regard for their privacy and dignity, including issues around death and dying. EVIDENCE: The three care plans looked at in depth contained clear and comprehensive assessments, were reviewed regularly and were signed where possible by the service user or relatives/advocates. There was a clear medication policy and the last visit from the pharmacist was 1/11/05; the Manager said that any issues arising from this had been addressed. A visiting district nurse said that in her opinion the standard of care was very good and that staff were knowledgeable, pleasant and quick to spot any potential situations needing medical attention. She said the home compared favourably with others in the area. Staff confirmed that they had training on death and dying during their induction at the Trust’s Head Office. Chandos House DS0000002344.V273979.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 10 Daily Life and Social Activities The intended outcomes for Standards 12 - 15 are: 12. 13. 14. 15. Service users find the lifestyle experienced in the home matches their expectations and preferences, and satisfies their social, cultural, religious and recreational interests and needs. Service users maintain contact with family/ friends/ representatives and the local community as they wish. Service users are helped to exercise choice and control over their lives. Service users receive a wholesome appealing balanced diet in pleasing surroundings at times convenient to them. The Commission considers all of the above key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): 12-15 Social activities are extensive and well promoted, creating a variety of events and activities which residents are informed about. The residents exercise choice about which activities, if any, they wish to participate in and what meals they want to eat. EVIDENCE: The home now employs an activities organiser whose 25-hour post is shared with another Orders of St. John Care Trust home in Grantham. This person is responsible for seeking the views of residents about what they wish to take part in. On the day of the inspection children from the local school were coming to sing carols and the following day was the Christmas party to which relatives and visitors were invited. Each resident had a record of activities including a list of preferred hobbies/interests and a family history. Activities were advertised around the home and the Manager said that there were plans to start a newsletter next year. The midday meal was nutritious and residents said how much they enjoyed them. There was a menu board displaying the day’s meals but there was no choice displayed and residents were unclear as to a choice. Staff confirmed that residents were asked on a daily basis for their choices of meals; monthly meal satisfaction forms were completed and sent to head office. Chandos House DS0000002344.V273979.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 11 Complaints and Protection The intended outcomes for Standards 16 - 18 are: 16. 17. 18. Service users and their relatives and friends are confident that their complaints will be listened to, taken seriously and acted upon. Service users’ legal rights are protected. Service users are protected from abuse. The Commission considers Standards 16 and 18 the key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): 16-18 The home’s complaints procedure is clear and gives residents and their relatives the confidence that comments and concerns will be listened to; there is a robust adult protection procedure and staff receive adequate training on adult protection issues. EVIDENCE: Residents and visitors to the home all said they did not wish to complain but knew how to make a complaint. The home had received no complaints in the last twelve months. There was a clear adult protection procedure, which was linked to the Local Authority procedures. Staff members spoken with confirmed that they had received in-house training on adult protection. Chandos House DS0000002344.V273979.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 12 Environment The intended outcomes for Standards 19 – 26 are: 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. Service users live in a safe, well-maintained environment. Service users have access to safe and comfortable indoor and outdoor communal facilities. Service users have sufficient and suitable lavatories and washing facilities. Service users have the specialist equipment they require to maximise their independence. Service users’ own rooms suit their needs. Service users live in safe, comfortable bedrooms with their own possessions around them. Service users live in safe, comfortable surroundings. The home is clean, pleasant and hygienic. The Commission considers Standards 19 and 26 the key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): 19-21, 23, 26 The residents live in a comfortable and pleasant environment with both private and communal space, which is generally suitable for their needs. EVIDENCE: Overall the standard of decorations internally and in the gardens was generally good and afforded residents a good degree of comfort. One resident said ‘I’ve just moved to a new room and this has good views; it’s very pleasant’. The home has a rolling maintenance rota, two bedrooms having been recently redecorated, and risk assessments are carried out on the premises to ensure that residents are safe from any potential hazards. The main lounge carpet had recently been renewed. The decorative exterior wood panels are in need of some attention and the Manager confirmed that it was due for refurbishment next year. The home was clean and tidy and smelled fresh throughout and the toilets and bathrooms were particularly pleasant and homely with a use of pictures, plants or flowers and curtains. Chandos House DS0000002344.V273979.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 13 Staffing The intended outcomes for Standards 27 – 30 are: 27. 28. 29. 30. Service users’ needs are met by the numbers and skill mix of staff. Service users are in safe hands at all times. Service users are supported and protected by the home’s recruitment policy and practices. Staff are trained and competent to do their jobs. The Commission consider all the above are key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): These standards were not inspected EVIDENCE: Although these standards were not fully inspected, the staff rota showed that there were enough staff numbers according to the staffing matrix and shifts were staggered to accommodate the needs of residents; residents made positive comments about the care they received from the staff. The National Vocational Qualification trainer was at the home on the day of the inspection and confirmed that all care leaders and three acting care leaders had NVQ at Level 3. Chandos House DS0000002344.V273979.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 14 Management and Administration The intended outcomes for Standards 31 – 38 are: 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. Service users live in a home which is run and managed by a person who is fit to be in charge, of good character and able to discharge his or her responsibilities fully. Service users benefit from the ethos, leadership and management approach of the home. The home is run in the best interests of service users. Service users are safeguarded by the accounting and financial procedures of the home. Service users’ financial interests are safeguarded. Staff are appropriately supervised. Service users’ rights and best interests are safeguarded by the home’s record keeping, policies and procedures. The health, safety and welfare of service users and staff are promoted and protected. The Commission considers Standards 31, 33, 35 and 38 the key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): 31-33,38 The home is managed competently and the staff are supported and supervised in carrying out their respective roles. The views of residents are listened to and they are involved in decisions affecting them. EVIDENCE: The registered Manager is progressing towards the NVQ Manager’s award at Level 4. The quality assurance manual demonstrated a positive approach to seeking the views of residents and residents spoken with said they were constantly asked for their views on matters concerning the running of the home. There was a record of meals with satisfaction, complaints and concerns logged. A quality assurance manager has now been appointed and is working at the home’s headquarters. The Trust also has a training manager, who organises an extensive programme of training for all staff. The home has the ISO 9000 award and the Investors in People award. Chandos House DS0000002344.V273979.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 15 SCORING OF OUTCOMES This page summarises the assessment of the extent to which the National Minimum Standards for Care Homes for Older People have been met and uses the following scale. The scale ranges from: 4 Standard Exceeded 2 Standard Almost Met (Commendable) (Minor Shortfalls) 3 Standard Met 1 Standard Not Met (No Shortfalls) (Major Shortfalls) “X” in the standard met box denotes standard not assessed on this occasion “N/A” in the standard met box denotes standard not applicable CHOICE OF HOME Standard No Score 1 2 3 4 5 6 ENVIRONMENT Standard No Score 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 3 3 x x 3 N/A HEALTH AND PERSONAL CARE Standard No Score 7 3 8 3 9 3 10 X 11 3 DAILY LIFE AND SOCIAL ACTIVITIES Standard No Score 12 3 13 3 14 3 15 3 COMPLAINTS AND PROTECTION Standard No Score 16 3 17 3 18 3 2 3 4 X 3 X X 3 STAFFING Standard No Score 27 X 28 X 29 X 30 X MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION Standard No 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 Score 3 3 3 X X X X 3 Chandos House DS0000002344.V273979.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 16 Are there any outstanding requirements from the last inspection? none STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS This section sets out the actions, which must be taken so that the registered person/s meets the Care Standards Act 2000, Care Homes Regulations 2001 and the National Minimum Standards. The Registered Provider(s) must comply with the given timescales. No. 1 Standard OP19 Regulation 23[2][b] Requirement The registered person must make arrangements for the upkeep of the decorative wooden panels on the exterior of the building. Timescale for action 14/01/06 RECOMMENDATIONS These recommendations relate to National Minimum Standards and are seen as good practice for the Registered Provider/s to consider carrying out. No. 1 Refer to Standard OP15 Good Practice Recommendations It is a recommendation that alternative choices are displayed on the notice board. Chandos House DS0000002344.V273979.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 17 Commission for Social Care Inspection Lincoln Area Office Unity House, The Point Weaver Road Off Whisby Road Lincoln LN6 3QN National Enquiry Line: 0845 015 0120 Email: enquiries@csci.gsi.gov.uk Web: www.csci.org.uk © This report is copyright Commission for Social Care Inspection (CSCI) and may only be used in its entirety. Extracts may not be used or reproduced without the express permission of CSCI Chandos House DS0000002344.V273979.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 18 - Please note that this information is included on www.bestcarehome.co.uk under license from the regulator. Re-publishing this information is in breach of the terms of use of that website. Discrete codes and changes have been inserted throughout the textual data shown on the site that will provide incontrovertable proof of copying in the event this information is re-published on other websites. The policy of www.bestcarehome.co.uk is to use all legal avenues to pursue such offenders, including recovery of costs. You have been warned!