Please wait

Please note that the information on this website is now out of date. It is planned that we will update and relaunch, but for now is of historical interest only and we suggest you visit cqc.org.uk

Inspection on 20/07/05 for St Mark`s Road Care Home - Block B

Also see our care home review for St Mark`s Road Care Home - Block B for more information

This inspection was carried out on 20th July 2005.

CSCI has not published a star rating for this report, though using similar criteria we estimate that the report is Adequate. The way we rate inspection reports is consistent for all houses, though please be aware that this may be different from an official CSCI judgement.

The inspector made no statutory requirements on the home as a result of this inspection and there were no outstanding actions from the previous inspection report.

What follows are excerpts from this inspection report. For more information read the full report on the next tab.

What the care home does well

This Care home provides a comfortable, spacious environment, which reflects a homely style in the way it has been decorated and the furnishings provided. The home is decorated throughout to a good standard. Service users benefit from having single bedrooms with en-suite facilities, and a ceiling tracking hoist to assist service users with physical disabilities. Specialist equipment is provided to meet individual`s needs and to encourage service users independence in their daily lives. Service users are consulted on aspects of daily living and are encouraged to make decisions about their daily lives. Some of the staff team have had a lot of experience of working with this service user group and create an inclusive and positive atmosphere for the service users to enjoy.

What has improved since the last inspection?

This is the homes first inspection.

What the care home could do better:

The Registered Persons must ensure that all service users are fully assessed before their admission to the home, and ensure that this assessment is available on their file for the staff to refer to. The service users should have their support plans/ care plans developed from these pre-admission assessments following their admission to enable the staff to have an up to date information on how to meet service users needs. The Responsible Persons must ensure that all documentation for service users is completed in full, and that staff complete healthcare monitoring records as required in order to monitor service users health and well being. The Responsible Persons need to implement guidance for the staff team on the use of Incident Analysis records so that they can be used appropriately and theinformation analysed effectively. The service users living at this home would benefit from a structured activity programme based on their preferred activities and interests. The Responsible Persons need to ensure that all of the staff team are aware of the homes aims and values and create an inclusive environment for the service users to live in.

CARE HOME ADULTS 18-65 St Marks Road Care Home 26 St Marks Road Chaddesden Derby DE21 6AH Lead Inspector Claire Williams Unannounced 20 July 2005 1.00pm The Commission for Social Care Inspection aims to: • • • • Put the people who use social care first Improve services and stamp out bad practice Be an expert voice on social care Practise what we preach in our own organisation Reader Information Document Purpose Author Audience Further copies from Copyright Inspection Report CSCI General Public 0870 240 7535 (telephone order line) This report is copyright Commission for Social Care Inspection (CSCI) and may only be used in its entirety. Extracts may not be used or reproduced without the express permission of CSCI www.csci.org.uk Internet address This is a report of an inspection to assess whether services are meeting the needs of people who use them. The legal basis for conducting inspections is the Care Standards Act 2000 and the relevant National Minimum Standards for this establishment are those for Care Homes for Adults 18-65. They can be found at www.dh.gov.uk or obtained from The Stationary Office (TSO) PO Box 29, St Crispins, Duke Street, Norwich, NR3 1GN. Tel: 0870 600 5522. Online ordering: www.tso.co.uk/bookshop This report is a public document. Extracts may not be used or reproduced without the prior permission of the Commission for Social Care Inspection. St Marks Road Care Home C52 C02 S63062 St Marks Road B V240530 200705 Stage 4.doc Version 1.40 Page 3 SERVICE INFORMATION Name of service St Marks Road Care Home Address 26 St Marks Road Chaddesden Derby DE21 6AH 01332 294466 01332 242449 Telephone number Fax number Email address Name of registered provider(s)/company (if applicable) Name of registered manager (if applicable) Type of registration No. of places registered (if applicable) Mr Glen Von Malachowski The Robinia Group PLC Ms Karen Mary Bridge Care Home with Personal Care 8 places Category(ies) of 8 LD Learning Disabilties registration, with number of places St Marks Road Care Home C52 C02 S63062 St Marks Road B V240530 200705 Stage 4.doc Version 1.40 Page 4 SERVICE INFORMATION Conditions of registration: None. Date of last inspection NA Brief Description of the Service: St Marks Care home is owed by the Robinia Care group. The home was purpose built and is spacious and creates a homely environment. The home is registered to provide personal care and accommodation for 8 people within the category of Learning Disabilities between the ages of 18- 65 years old. The home is situated on the edge of Derby and is close to local amentities. The home has all single bedrooms with en-suite facilities. St Marks Road Care Home C52 C02 S63062 St Marks Road B V240530 200705 Stage 4.doc Version 1.40 Page 5 SUMMARY This is an overview of what the inspector found during the inspection. This was an unannounced inspection, which was undertaken due to the Commission for Social Care Inspection receiving a complaint about the service Robinia was providing. The inspection commenced at 1pm and lasted 7 hours. The inspector examined service users files, and observed staff interactions with the service users. A brief tour of the building was undertaken, and discussions were held with the deputy, Registered Manager and a consultant from the organisation. This is the first inspection since the home was registered with Commission for Social Care Inspection in December 2004. What the service does well: What has improved since the last inspection? What they could do better: The Registered Persons must ensure that all service users are fully assessed before their admission to the home, and ensure that this assessment is available on their file for the staff to refer to. The service users should have their support plans/ care plans developed from these pre-admission assessments following their admission to enable the staff to have an up to date information on how to meet service users needs. The Responsible Persons must ensure that all documentation for service users is completed in full, and that staff complete healthcare monitoring records as required in order to monitor service users health and well being. The Responsible Persons need to implement guidance for the staff team on the use of Incident Analysis records so that they can be used appropriately and the St Marks Road Care Home C52 C02 S63062 St Marks Road B V240530 200705 Stage 4.doc Version 1.40 Page 6 information analysed effectively. The service users living at this home would benefit from a structured activity programme based on their preferred activities and interests. The Responsible Persons need to ensure that all of the staff team are aware of the homes aims and values and create an inclusive environment for the service users to live in. Please contact the provider for advice of actions taken in response to this inspection. The report of this inspection is available from enquiries@csci.gsi.gov.uk or by contacting your local CSCI office. St Marks Road Care Home C52 C02 S63062 St Marks Road B V240530 200705 Stage 4.doc Version 1.40 Page 7 DETAILS OF INSPECTOR FINDINGS CONTENTS Choice of Home (Standards 1–5) Individual Needs and Choices (Standards 6-10) Lifestyle (Standards 11-17) Personal and Healthcare Support (Standards 18-21) Concerns, Complaints and Protection (Standards 22-23) Environment (Standards 24-30) Staffing (Standards 31-36) Conduct and Management of the Home (Standards 37 – 43) Scoring of Standards Statutory Requirements Identified During the Inspection St Marks Road Care Home C52 C02 S63062 St Marks Road B V240530 200705 Stage 4.doc Version 1.40 Page 8 Choice of Home The intended outcomes for Standards 1 – 5 are: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Prospective service users have the information they need to make an informed choice about where to live. Prospective users’ individual aspirations and needs are assessed. Prospective service users’ know that the home that they will choose will meet their needs and aspirations. Prospective service users have an opportunity to visit and to “test drive” the home. Each service user has an individual written contract or statement of terms and conditions with the home. The Commission consider Standard 2 the key standard to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for standard(s) 2 and 4 Pre admission assessments and up to date information was not available resulting in staff not being aware of how to meet service users support needs on admission to the care home. EVIDENCE: The inspector examined two service users files for individuals who had recently moved into the home. There was limited evidence in both files to support that pre-admission assessment had been undertaken. The inspector was informed that a pre-admission assessment had been completed for one service user who had moved from another area, but this documentation was located in the service users file at the head office. A personal service plan was located in the file that had been completed by the service users Care Manager The second file was for a service user who had moved from another home owed by Robinia, an updated assessment of this individuals needs had not been completed. There was limited information in this file to support that the service users representative had been involved or consulted about the move or any plans made concerning the transition to this home. The inspector spoke with one of these service users who confirmed that trial visits were undertaken, which enabled him to have the opportunity to have a look around the home, and to meet the other service users and the staff team. However there were no records maintained of these visits. St Marks Road Care Home C52 C02 S63062 St Marks Road B V240530 200705 Stage 4.doc Version 1.40 Page 9 Individual Needs and Choices The intended outcomes for Standards 6 – 10 are: 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Service users know their assessed and changing needs and personal goals are reflected in their individual Plan. Service users make decisions about their lives with assistance as needed. Service users are consulted on, and participate, in all aspects of life in the home. Service users are supported to take risks as part of an independent lifestyle. Service users know that information about them is handled appropriately, and that their confidences are kept The Commission considers Standards 6, 7 and 9 the key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for standard(s) 6, 7, 9 10 Service user care plans do not contain sufficient information to ensure that individual aspirations and support needs are met. Although management assessments are in place these do not safeguard service users from risk. EVIDENCE: One of the service users files contained comprehensive support plans covering all aspects of the individual’s life, that was compiled as a series of ‘aims and objectives progress sheets and ‘risk assessments’. The areas covered within these plans were varied but included aspects of personal and health care specific to individuals. However the plans were dated March 2005, and the service user moved into the home in January 2005. The inspector was informed that the staff had followed the previous placements care plans while new care plans were being devised. There was evidence that the service user’s plans were reviewed on a monthly basis and that formal reviews had taken place. The second file contained support plans that had been implemented whilst the service user was living in the first home he moved into that was owed by Robinia. These plans were therefore outdated. A couple of Personal Service plans was in the file, which had been implemented by the previous home but only one was dated - 22/2/05. Although the plan covered majority of the St Marks Road Care Home C52 C02 S63062 St Marks Road B V240530 200705 Stage 4.doc Version 1.40 Page 10 required areas, some of the information was out of date as the service users support needs had changed. There was evidence to support that a review of this persons needs had been undertaken in January 2005, but this was based on the first move the service user had to another home owed by Robinia. Both files did not contain a photo of the service users. During the inspection staff were observed asking service users their preferences about daily aspects of their life, for example, in terms of choice of food, drinks, personal care, and activities. Service users spoken to did confirm that they were consulted on a regular basis. Risk assessments and behaviour management plans were implemented for both service users. However for one service user these were out of date. A comprehensive set of risk assessments was in place for another service user, which linked in with their progress support plans. The home use ‘ABC Incident Analysis Record’ these documents are used to record any behaviours that could be challenging and any significant events. Some of these forms completed for these service users were not signed or dated or completed in full. Following one incident that occurred with a service user a behaviour risk assessment had been implemented to reduce identified risks, however a moving and handling risk assessment had not been implemented to reduce further risks to the service user during personal care tasks, which was identified on the same incident sheet. Both service users had a lot of these forms completed for various incidents, however there was limited information to support that an analysis of the incidents had taken place and any action implemented to prevent the incidents occurring again. One of these forms was inappropriately completed following a service user having an accident. The inspector was informed that the organisation has not provided guidance to staff or managers on how to use these recording tools effectively. During they inspection the inspector observed staff openly talking about a service user who is in hospital in front of other service users and staff members. Some of the discussions were not positive about the service users or their family members. These observations were brought to the attention of the Registered Manager. St Marks Road Care Home C52 C02 S63062 St Marks Road B V240530 200705 Stage 4.doc Version 1.40 Page 11 Lifestyle The intended outcomes for Standards 11 - 17 are: 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. Service users have opportunities for personal development. Service users are able to take part in age, peer and culturally appropriate activities. Service users are part of the local community. Service users engage in appropriate leisure activities. Service users have appropriate personal, family and sexual relationships. Service users’ rights are respected and responsibilities recognised in their daily lives. Service users are offered a healthy diet and enjoy their meals and mealtimes. The Commission considers Standards 12, 13, 15, 16 and 17 the key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for standard(s) 12, 14, 16 and 17 The staff team do not support service users to engage in meaningful activities and do not respect service users rights in their daily lives. EVIDENCE: Majority of the service users living at this home do not attend any daytime facilities. Due to the service users support needs they are unable to access employment. One service user attends a day care placement, which she attended previously before moving into the home. In the files examined there was limited information in relation to service users preferred activities, hobbies and interests. There was no information referring to how service users would like to spend their day or any programme of activities for service users to participate in. The inspector was informed that an activities co-ordinator has been employed and is in the process of developing activity plans. A sensory room is available at the home but was not in use at the time of the inspection. The inspector did observe the staff interacting with service users, but this was only after the manager arrived and prompted the staff to undertake activities. Previous to this service users and the staff were sitting in the dining room for a St Marks Road Care Home C52 C02 S63062 St Marks Road B V240530 200705 Stage 4.doc Version 1.40 Page 12 period of time with the staff at times talking between themselves and not facilitating any activities or discussions with the service users. The inspector observed staff asking service users what food they would like for their lunch and this was prepared accordingly. The staff members supported some service users to eat their meal. The mealtime was fairly relaxed and service users were not rushed when being supported to eat their dinner. However the inspector noted that one service user was supported by two different staff members to eat his meal, which did not provide a consistent approach to supporting this individual. St Marks Road Care Home C52 C02 S63062 St Marks Road B V240530 200705 Stage 4.doc Version 1.40 Page 13 Personal and Healthcare Support The intended outcomes for Standards 18 - 21 are: 18. 19. 20. 21. Service users receive personal support in the way they prefer and require. Service users’ physical and emotional health needs are met. Service users retain, administer and control their own medication where appropriate, and are protected by the home’s policies and procedures for dealing with medicines. The ageing, illness and death of a service user are handled with respect and as the individual would wish. The Commission considers Standards 18, 19, and 20 the key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for standard(s) 18, and 19 Service users physical and emotional health needs are not consistently met by the home. EVIDENCE: Each service user had a separate medical file, which contained all of the correspondence concerning their medical needs. The inspector was unable to access one service user’s file as it was at the hospital for recording purposes. The service users file examined did contain records of healthcare visits and outcomes and various professional reports i.e. Speech and language therapy and NHS correspondence. In order to meet a service users healthcare needs, it was identified that their fluids, food intake and any epileptic seizures had to be monitored and recorded. However the inspector noted several gaps in the recording charts and the paperwork. Some of the monitoring forms were not dated therefore it was difficult to ascertain when they were completed. The home currently does not have access to any scales, therefore the service users weight is not monitored. Majority of the service users living at this home have a physical disability therefore would require the use of chair scales in order to be weighed; the inspector was informed that chair scales have been ordered. The inspector and the Registered Manager had a discussion concerning the use of tissue viability forms, as a monitoring tool to identify any pressure areas due to service users who use wheelchairs sitting in one position for long periods of time. The inspector gave the Registered Manager some information on this tool and its purpose. St Marks Road Care Home C52 C02 S63062 St Marks Road B V240530 200705 Stage 4.doc Version 1.40 Page 14 Concerns, Complaints and Protection The intended outcomes for Standards 22 – 23 are: 22. 23. Service users feel their views are listened to and acted on. Service users are protected from abuse, neglect and self-harm. The Commission considers Standards 22, and 23 the key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for standard(s) These standards not assessed on this occasion. EVIDENCE: Although theses standards were not assessed on this occasion, one of the reasons for the inspection was due to the Commission for Social Care Inspection receiving two complaints about the service provided by Robinia and in particular concerning one service user who now lives at this home, but at the time of the inspection was in hospital. One of the complaints has been referred back to the provider to investigate and as stated one complaint was investigated during this inspection visit. St Marks Road Care Home C52 C02 S63062 St Marks Road B V240530 200705 Stage 4.doc Version 1.40 Page 15 Environment The intended outcomes for Standards 24 – 30 are: 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. Service users live in a homely, comfortable and safe environment. Service users’ bedrooms suit their needs and lifestyles. Service users’ bedrooms promote their independence. Service users’ toilets and bathrooms provide sufficient privacy and meet their individual needs. Shared spaces complement and supplement service users’ individual rooms. Service users have the specialist equipment they require to maximise their independence. The home is clean and hygienic. The Commission considers Standards 24, and 30 the key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for standard(s) 24, 25, 26, 29 and 30 Service users benefit from a spacious environment, which is homely, and creates a comfortable and safe environment. EVIDENCE: The inspector undertook a brief tour of the building. The home is purpose built and very spacious, enabling service users to move around freely in their wheelchairs. All bedrooms are of single occupancy with en-suite facilities. Each bedroom had been personalised to reflect the individual’s interests. Each room is also fitted with a ceiling tracking hoist to assist with the moving and handling of service users with physical disabilities. Other aids and adaptations to assist with individual’s mobility were also provided including specialist baths and hoists. The kitchen area has a worktop, which can be accessed by a service user using a wheelchair creating an enabling environment. The garden and outside areas are all accessible for wheelchairs and the home is currently developing the garden. The inspector observed service users being supported to use the outside areas. St Marks Road Care Home C52 C02 S63062 St Marks Road B V240530 200705 Stage 4.doc Version 1.40 Page 16 The laundry area is located along the corridor. Service users could access this room, but due to its size and the temperature they do not use the room or assist in laundry tasks. The inspector observed staff members making comments about how ‘hot’ the temperature of the room was, and the need for a larger extractor fan in order to ensure the temperature is adequate to work in. All areas of the home were clean and hygienic. The care home is located on a site with another care home owed by Robinia. The home does not have a number located on the front door making it difficult for external people to locate the address of the home should they need to visit. St Marks Road Care Home C52 C02 S63062 St Marks Road B V240530 200705 Stage 4.doc Version 1.40 Page 17 Staffing The intended outcomes for Standards 31 – 36 are: 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. Service users benefit from clarity of staff roles and responsibilities. Service users are supported by competent and qualified staff. Service users are supported by an effective staff team. Service users are supported and protected by the home’s recruitment policy and practices. Service users’ individual and joint needs are met by appropriately trained staff. Service users benefit from well supported and supervised staff. The Commission considers Standards 35 the key standard to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for standard(s) 31 Service users are supported by a staff team with a mixture of skills and experiences; some of the practices observed did not create an inclusive atmosphere. EVIDENCE: A mixture of experienced and newly recruited staff was on duty at the time of the inspection. Observation of staff interactions with service users was varied depending upon the experience of the staff member. Some staff members were observed being proactive and encouraging service users to participate in activities. Some staff however did not positively interact with service users and chose to speak between themselves instead. These observations unfortunately gave a negative view of the staff not being motivated or enthusiastic about working and supporting these individuals and ensuring that the homes aims and values are implemented and met. St Marks Road Care Home C52 C02 S63062 St Marks Road B V240530 200705 Stage 4.doc Version 1.40 Page 18 Conduct and Management of the Home The intended outcomes for Standards 37 – 43 are: 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. Service users benefit from a well run home. Service users benefit from the ethos, leadership and management approach of the home. Service users are confident their views underpin all self-monitoring, review and development by the home. Service users’ rights and best interests are safeguarded by the home’s policies and procedures. Service users’ rights and best interests are safeguarded by the home’s record keeping policies and procedures. The health, safety and welfare of service users are promoted and protected. Service users benefit from competent and accountable management of the service. The Commission considers Standards 39, and 42 the key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for standard(s) These standards were not assessed on this occasion. EVIDENCE: St Marks Road Care Home C52 C02 S63062 St Marks Road B V240530 200705 Stage 4.doc Version 1.40 Page 19 SCORING OF OUTCOMES This page summarises the assessment of the extent to which the National Minimum Standards for Care Homes for Adults 18-65 have been met and uses the following scale. The scale ranges from: 4 Standard Exceeded 2 Standard Almost Met (Commendable) (Minor Shortfalls) 3 Standard Met 1 Standard Not Met (No Shortfalls) (Major Shortfalls) “X” in the standard met box denotes standard not assessed on this occasion “N/A” in the standard met box denotes standard not applicable CHOICE OF HOME CONCERNS AND COMPLAINTS Standard No 1 2 3 4 5 Score x 2 x 3 x Standard No 22 23 ENVIRONMENT Score x x INDIVIDUAL NEEDS AND CHOICES Standard No 6 7 8 9 10 LIFESTYLES Score 2 3 x 2 2 Score Standard No 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 STAFFING Score 3 3 3 x x 3 3 Standard No 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 x 3 x 2 x 2 3 Standard No 31 32 33 34 35 36 Score 2 x x x x x CONDUCT AND MANAGEMENT OF THE HOME PERSONAL AND HEALTHCARE SUPPORT Standard No 18 19 20 21 St Marks Road Care Home Score 2 2 x x Standard No 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 Score x x x x x x x C52 C02 S63062 St Marks Road B V240530 200705 Stage 4.doc Version 1.40 Page 20 NA Are there any outstanding requirements from the last inspection? STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS This section sets out the actions which must be taken so that the registered person/s meets the Care Standards Act 2000, Care Homes Regulations 2001 and the National Minimum Standards. The Registered Provider(s) must comply with the given timescales. No. 1. Standard 2 Regulation 14 (1) (a) Requirement Timescale for action 31st November 2005 31st November 2005 31st November 2005 2. 2 14 (1) 3. 2 14 (1) 4. 6 15 (1) 5. 6 15 (b) 6. 7. 6 9 17 (1) 12 (1) The Registered Persons must ensure that service users needs are assessed before their admission to the home. (b) The Registered Person must ensure a copy of this assessment if kept on the service users file at the home. ( c) The Registered Person must ensure that the service user and their representative have been consulted regarding the assessment and the transistion to the home and records maintained. The Registered Person must ensure that all service users have an updated plan of care covering all areas as identified in Standard 2.3 following their admission to the home. The Registered Person must ensure that care plans are reviewed every six months as recommended in Standard 6.10 or when their needs change. (a) The Registered Persons must ensure that a photo of the service user is kept on their file. (a) The Registered Person must ensure that risk assessments are 31st October 2005 31st November 2005 31st November 2005 31st November Page 21 St Marks Road Care Home C52 C02 S63062 St Marks Road B V240530 200705 Stage 4.doc Version 1.40 8. 9 12 (1) (a) 9. 9 12 (4) (a) 10. 10 12 (4) (a) 11. 14 16 (m) 12. 16 and 31 12 (4) (a) 13. 18 and 19 17 (1) (a) implemented and are signed, dated and reviewed accordingly detailing why the assessment remains the same or requires changing. The Registered Person must ensure that Managers and the Staff team are given guidance on the use of Incident Analysis Charts in order to complete them accurately. The Registered Persons must ensure that when regular incidents occur a strategy is implemented to reduce the risks to service users and staff. The Registered Persons must ensure that the staff team handle service users information ina confidential manner The Registered Persons must ensure that each service user has a programme of activities, and that service users are supported to participate in these activities. The Registered Persons must ensure that the staff team talk to and interact with the service users, not exclusively with each other The Registered Persons must ensure that service users healthcare monitoring records are completed in full and as recommended in order to ensure that their needs are met. 2005 31st November 2005 31st November 2005 31st October 2005 31st November 2005 31st October 2005 31st October 2005 14. RECOMMENDATIONS These recommendations relate to National Minimum Standards and are seen as good practice for the Registered Provider/s to consider carrying out. No. Refer to Standard Good Practice Recommendations C52 C02 S63062 St Marks Road B V240530 200705 Stage 4.doc Version 1.40 Page 22 St Marks Road Care Home 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 4 6 and 9 17 19 19 24 30 31 The Registered Persons should ensure that records are maintained of trial visits to the home. The Registered Persons should ensure that all documentation completed for services users is signed and dated and completed in full. The Registered Persons should ensure that only one staff member supports a service user to eat their meal throughout the duration of that meal. The Registered Persons should contact a District Nurse to discuss the possible use of Tissue Viability assessments in order to monitor service users pressure areas. The Registered Persons should consider purchasing chair scales in order to monitor service users weight. The Registered Persons should consider putting a number on the front door to enable external people to be able to identify the home. The Registered Persons should consider installing a larger extractor fan in the laundry area in order to reduce the hot temperature in the room. The Registered Persons should ensure that the staff team are aware of and support the main aims and values of the home. St Marks Road Care Home C52 C02 S63062 St Marks Road B V240530 200705 Stage 4.doc Version 1.40 Page 23 Commission for Social Care Inspection South Point Cardinal Square Nottingham Road Derby DE1 3QT National Enquiry Line: 0845 015 0120 Email: enquiries@csci.gsi.gov.uk Web: www.csci.org.uk © This report is copyright Commission for Social Care Inspection (CSCI) and may only be used in its entirety. Extracts may not be used or reproduced without the express permission of CSCI St Marks Road Care Home C52 C02 S63062 St Marks Road B V240530 200705 Stage 4.doc Version 1.40 Page 24 - Please note that this information is included on www.bestcarehome.co.uk under license from the regulator. Re-publishing this information is in breach of the terms of use of that website. Discrete codes and changes have been inserted throughout the textual data shown on the site that will provide incontrovertable proof of copying in the event this information is re-published on other websites. The policy of www.bestcarehome.co.uk is to use all legal avenues to pursue such offenders, including recovery of costs. You have been warned!