CARE HOMES FOR OLDER PEOPLE
Cedar House 6 Dryden Road Enfield Middlesex EN1 2PP Lead Inspector
Tony Brennan Unannounced Inspection 1st November 2005 11:00 X10015.doc Version 1.40 Page 1 The Commission for Social Care Inspection aims to: • • • • Put the people who use social care first Improve services and stamp out bad practice Be an expert voice on social care Practise what we preach in our own organisation Reader Information
Document Purpose Author Audience Further copies from Copyright Inspection Report CSCI General Public 0870 240 7535 (telephone order line) This report is copyright Commission for Social Care Inspection (CSCI) and may only be used in its entirety. Extracts may not be used or reproduced without the express permission of CSCI www.csci.org.uk Internet address Cedar House DS0000010650.V259156.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 2 This is a report of an inspection to assess whether services are meeting the needs of people who use them. The legal basis for conducting inspections is the Care Standards Act 2000 and the relevant National Minimum Standards for this establishment are those for Care Homes for Older People. They can be found at www.dh.gov.uk or obtained from The Stationery Office (TSO) PO Box 29, St Crispins, Duke Street, Norwich, NR3 1GN. Tel: 0870 600 5522. Online ordering: www.tso.co.uk/bookshop This report is a public document. Extracts may not be used or reproduced without the prior permission of the Commission for Social Care Inspection. Cedar House DS0000010650.V259156.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 3 SERVICE INFORMATION
Name of service Cedar House Address 6 Dryden Road Enfield Middlesex EN1 2PP Telephone number Fax number Email address Provider Web address Name of registered provider(s)/company (if applicable) Name of registered manager (if applicable) Type of registration No. of places registered (if applicable) 020 8360 3613 020 8360 3613 Cedar House Company Limited Mary Ezzat Mrs Sonja Anne Woods Care Home 17 Category(ies) of Mental disorder, excluding learning disability or registration, with number dementia (1), Old age, not falling within any of places other category (16) Cedar House DS0000010650.V259156.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 4 SERVICE INFORMATION
Conditions of registration: 1. Admission Criteria Limited to sixteen adults of either gender who fall into the old age category (OP) and one person who has a mental disorder, excluding learning disability or dementia (MD). 19th July 2005 Date of last inspection Brief Description of the Service: Cedar House is a care home registered to provide residential care for seventeen elderly people of either sex, one of whom may have a mental health disorder. The home is a limited company owned by Dr. G Kattan and Ms Mary Ezzat. The home is located in a quiet residential area in Bush Hill Park about two minutes walk away from a train station. Enfield town centre is one stop by train and cafés, newsagents, restaurants and a post office are within two to three minutes walk from the home. The home has a large garden. The bedrooms are arranged on two floors. There are eleven single rooms and three double rooms. On the ground floor there is a lounge overlooking the garden and the dining room is at the front of the house. A room next to the kitchen is also used as a dining room. The table in this room is used for different purposes at different times. It is sometimes used for games, for writing and for eating. Another lounge is provided in the extension part of the building adjacent to the back garden. A table and chairs are available for service users to sit in the garden if they wish and if the weather permits. The home aims to provide care and support that is tailored to each service users needs. Cedar House DS0000010650.V259156.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 5 SUMMARY
This is an overview of what the inspector found during the inspection. This unannounced inspection was undertaken as part of the annual inspection process. The inspector also sought to confirm that the fourteen areas for improvement found at the last inspection were addressed. The inspection took place over one day. The inspector spoke with three people who live at the home and three staff. The inspector also spent time observing the care being given and the interaction between staff and people living at the home. The inspector toured the building and examined a range of records relating to the care and management of the home. What the service does well: What has improved since the last inspection? What they could do better: Please contact the provider for advice of actions taken in response to this inspection. The report of this inspection is available from enquiries@csci.gsi.gov.uk or by contacting your local CSCI office. Cedar House DS0000010650.V259156.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 6 DETAILS OF INSPECTOR FINDINGS CONTENTS
Choice of Home (Standards 1–6) Health and Personal Care (Standards 7-11) Daily Life and Social Activities (Standards 12-15) Complaints and Protection (Standards 16-18) Environment (Standards 19-26) Staffing (Standards 27-30) Management and Administration (Standards 31-38) Scoring of Outcomes Statutory Requirements Identified During the Inspection Cedar House DS0000010650.V259156.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 7 Choice of Home
The intended outcomes for Standards 1 – 6 are: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Prospective service users have the information they need to make an informed choice about where to live. Each service user has a written contract/ statement of terms and conditions with the home. No service user moves into the home without having had his/her needs assessed and been assured that these will be met. Service users and their representatives know that the home they enter will meet their needs. Prospective service users and their relatives and friends have an opportunity to visit and assess the quality, facilities and suitability of the home. Service users assessed and referred solely for intermediate care are helped to maximise their independence and return home. The Commission considers Standards 3 and 6 the key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): N/A These were not inspected on this occasion. EVIDENCE: Cedar House DS0000010650.V259156.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 8 Health and Personal Care
The intended outcomes for Standards 7 – 11 are: 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. The service user’s health, personal and social care needs are set out in an individual plan of care. Service users’ health care needs are fully met. Service users, where appropriate, are responsible for their own medication, and are protected by the home’s policies and procedures for dealing with medicines. Service users feel they are treated with respect and their right to privacy is upheld. Service users are assured that at the time of their death, staff will treat them and their family with care, sensitivity and respect. The Commission considers Standards 7, 8, 9 and 10 the key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): 7 9 10 Service users have sufficient information and details on how their needs are met. Service users are protected by safe procedures for handling medication. Service users dignity and privacy is always maintained. EVIDENCE: Care plans have been reviewed monthly since the last inspection. Care plans contained sufficient information on the needs of service users. Care plans contained details of service users personal preferences (e g time of getting up and going to be). Food preferences and interests were also included. Since the last inspection the oxygen cylinder in a service user’s bedroom had been removed. All records relating to the administration of medicines were complete. Service users said that staff respect their privacy and always knock on their bedroom doors. Service users also said that staff take time to ask how they wished to be assisted. Cedar House DS0000010650.V259156.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 9 Daily Life and Social Activities
The intended outcomes for Standards 12 - 15 are: 12. 13. 14. 15. Service users find the lifestyle experienced in the home matches their expectations and preferences, and satisfies their social, cultural, religious and recreational interests and needs. Service users maintain contact with family/ friends/ representatives and the local community as they wish. Service users are helped to exercise choice and control over their lives. Service users receive a wholesome appealing balanced diet in pleasing surroundings at times convenient to them. The Commission considers all of the above key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): 12 13 14 Service users are provided with sufficient and varied activities to meet their needs. Service users are supported to maintain contact with relatives and other representatives of their choice. Service users are able to make choices about how they live in the home. EVIDENCE: Service users spoken to said that they were offered a range of activities. The inspector saw that there was an activities programme in place. There were adverts for entertainers who were due to visit the home. Service users spoken to confirmed they had a choice as to whom they wished to see. Service users spoken to confirmed that they could make choices and control their lives. Cedar House DS0000010650.V259156.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 10 Complaints and Protection
The intended outcomes for Standards 16 - 18 are: 16. 17. 18. Service users and their relatives and friends are confident that their complaints will be listened to, taken seriously and acted upon. Service users’ legal rights are protected. Service users are protected from abuse. The Commission considers Standards 16 and 18 the key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): N/A These were not inspected on this occasion. EVIDENCE: Cedar House DS0000010650.V259156.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 11 Environment
The intended outcomes for Standards 19 – 26 are: 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. Service users live in a safe, well-maintained environment. Service users have access to safe and comfortable indoor and outdoor communal facilities. Service users have sufficient and suitable lavatories and washing facilities. Service users have the specialist equipment they require to maximise their independence. Service users’ own rooms suit their needs. Service users live in safe, comfortable bedrooms with their own possessions around them. Service users live in safe, comfortable surroundings. The home is clean, pleasant and hygienic. The Commission considers Standards 19 and 26 the key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): 19 Service users live in a safe and homely environment. EVIDENCE: Since the last inspection the bathroom and toilet floors had been replaced. A programme for the maintenance of the home is in place. The garden is accessible and safe. Cedar House DS0000010650.V259156.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 12 Staffing
The intended outcomes for Standards 27 – 30 are: 27. 28. 29. 30. Service users’ needs are met by the numbers and skill mix of staff. Service users are in safe hands at all times. Service users are supported and protected by the home’s recruitment policy and practices. Staff are trained and competent to do their jobs. The Commission consider all the above are key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): 30 Staff do have the skills to meet all the needs of service users. EVIDENCE: Since the last inspection ten staff have received training on adult protection. Training has been agreed to cover manual handling and dementia care. Cedar House DS0000010650.V259156.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 13 Management and Administration
The intended outcomes for Standards 31 – 38 are: 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. Service users live in a home which is run and managed by a person who is fit to be in charge, of good character and able to discharge his or her responsibilities fully. Service users benefit from the ethos, leadership and management approach of the home. The home is run in the best interests of service users. Service users are safeguarded by the accounting and financial procedures of the home. Service users’ financial interests are safeguarded. Staff are appropriately supervised. Service users’ rights and best interests are safeguarded by the home’s record keeping, policies and procedures. The health, safety and welfare of service users and staff are promoted and protected. The Commission considers Standards 31, 33, 35 and 38 the key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): 31 33 35 36 38 The manager needs to be trained in supervision in order to ensure that staff are provided with the support they need to respond to service users. Service users have been consulted about the quality of the service provided and encouraged to make suggestions for improvement. Service users financial interests are protected by the home’s procedures. The risks to staff have not been assessed. EVIDENCE: The manager has applied to become the registered manager for Cedar House. The manager explained that she still needs to complete training on supervision, and needs to apply for the Registered Managers Award. The manager explained she has identified a college to do the course. The home has a system in place for the consultation of service users views on the quality of the service. The inspector saw that a survey had been carried out and issues raised had been responded to. Either relatives or social service departments manage most of the service users’ money. Three service users’ money is managed by the home. Each service user has a separate account and
Cedar House DS0000010650.V259156.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 14 any expenditure is recorded. The home does not hold cash, paying any bills by cheque drawn on the service users account. The manager explained that she still needs to commence supervision of the staff. There is still a need to put in place risk assessments for all working practices. Open packets of food have now been put in sealed containers. Fire records show that all checks have been carried out and drills occurred. Cedar House DS0000010650.V259156.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 15 SCORING OF OUTCOMES
This page summarises the assessment of the extent to which the National Minimum Standards for Care Homes for Older People have been met and uses the following scale. The scale ranges from:
4 Standard Exceeded 2 Standard Almost Met (Commendable) (Minor Shortfalls) 3 Standard Met 1 Standard Not Met (No Shortfalls) (Major Shortfalls) “X” in the standard met box denotes standard not assessed on this occasion “N/A” in the standard met box denotes standard not applicable
CHOICE OF HOME Standard No Score 1 2 3 4 5 6 ENVIRONMENT Standard No Score 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 X X X X X N/A HEALTH AND PERSONAL CARE Standard No Score 7 3 8 X 9 3 10 3 11 X DAILY LIFE AND SOCIAL ACTIVITIES Standard No Score 12 3 13 3 14 3 15 X COMPLAINTS AND PROTECTION Standard No Score 16 X 17 X 18 X 3 X X X X X X x STAFFING Standard No Score 27 X 28 X 29 X 30 3 MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION Standard No 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 Score 2 X 3 X 3 2 X 2 Cedar House DS0000010650.V259156.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 16 Yes Are there any outstanding requirements from the last inspection? STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS This section sets out the actions, which must be taken so that the registered person/s meets the Care Standards Act 2000, Care Homes Regulations 2001 and the National Minimum Standards. The Registered Provider(s) must comply with the given timescales. No. 1 Standard OP31 Regulation 18(1)(a) Requirement The registered persons must ensure that the manager receives training in supervision. (The time scale of 01/09/05 was not met). The registered persons must ensure that staff have supervision six times a year and that this is recorded. (The time scale of 01/09/05 was not met). The responsible person must ensure that risk assessments are put in place for all working practices. (The time scale of 01/09/05 was not met). Timescale for action 01/01/06 2 OP36 18(2) 01/01/06 3 OP38 13 01/01/06 RECOMMENDATIONS These recommendations relate to National Minimum Standards and are seen as good practice for the Registered Provider/s to consider carrying out. No. 1. Refer to Standard OP31 Good Practice Recommendations The registered persons should ensure that the manager commences the Registered Managers Award. Cedar House DS0000010650.V259156.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 17 Commission for Social Care Inspection Southgate Area Office Solar House, 1st Floor 282 Chase Road Southgate London N14 6HA National Enquiry Line: 0845 015 0120 Email: enquiries@csci.gsi.gov.uk Web: www.csci.org.uk
© This report is copyright Commission for Social Care Inspection (CSCI) and may only be used in its entirety. Extracts may not be used or reproduced without the express permission of CSCI Cedar House DS0000010650.V259156.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 18 - Please note that this information is included on www.bestcarehome.co.uk under license from the regulator. Re-publishing this information is in breach of the terms of use of that website. Discrete codes and changes have been inserted throughout the textual data shown on the site that will provide incontrovertable proof of copying in the event this information is re-published on other websites. The policy of www.bestcarehome.co.uk is to use all legal avenues to pursue such offenders, including recovery of costs. You have been warned!