Inspection on 03/11/05 for Courthill House

This inspection was carried out on 3rd November 2005.

CSCI has not published a star rating for this report, though using similar criteria we estimate that the report is Good. The way we rate inspection reports is consistent for all houses, though please be aware that this may be different from an official CSCI judgement.

The inspector found no outstanding requirements from the previous inspection report, but made 1 statutory requirements (actions the home must comply with) as a result of this inspection.

Other inspections for this house

Courthill House 27/02/07

Courthill House 09/05/05

Courthill House 17/08/04

Courthill House 05/04/04

Similar services:

Thorndene

Insight - Eastchurch

Southfields

Magenta

Seabourne House

33 St John`s Church Road

Dovedale Court

Lyncol House

Extracts from inspection reports are licensed from CQC, this page was updated on 08/07/2008.

CARE HOME ADULTS 18-65 Courthill House Courthill House Court Hill Chipstead Surrey CR5 3NQ Lead Inspector Peter Benthom Announced Inspection 3rd November 2005 10:00 Courthill House DS0000013617.V255391.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 1 The Commission for Social Care Inspection aims to: • • • • Put the people who use social care first Improve services and stamp out bad practice Be an expert voice on social care Practise what we preach in our own organisation Reader Information Document Purpose Author Audience Further copies from Copyright Inspection Report CSCI General Public 0870 240 7535 (telephone order line) This report is copyright Commission for Social Care Inspection (CSCI) and may only be used in its entirety. Extracts may not be used or reproduced without the express permission of CSCI www.csci.org.uk Internet address Courthill House DS0000013617.V255391.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 2 This is a report of an inspection to assess whether services are meeting the needs of people who use them. The legal basis for conducting inspections is the Care Standards Act 2000 and the relevant National Minimum Standards for this establishment are those for Care Homes for Adults 18-65. They can be found at www.dh.gov.uk or obtained from The Stationery Office (TSO) PO Box 29, St Crispins, Duke Street, Norwich, NR3 1GN. Tel: 0870 600 5522. Online ordering: www.tso.co.uk/bookshop This report is a public document. Extracts may not be used or reproduced without the prior permission of the Commission for Social Care Inspection. Courthill House DS0000013617.V255391.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 3 SERVICE INFORMATION Name of service Courthill House Address Courthill House Court Hill Chipstead Surrey CR5 3NQ 01737 557442 Telephone number Fax number Email address Provider Web address Name of registered provider(s)/company (if applicable) Name of registered manager (if applicable) Type of registration No. of places registered (if applicable) Surrey Oaklands NHS Trust Mr Padmasiri Parakrama Warnakula Care Home 10 Category(ies) of Learning disability (10), Physical disability (2) registration, with number of places Courthill House DS0000013617.V255391.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 4 SERVICE INFORMATION Conditions of registration: 1. 2. 3. The age/age range of the persons to be accommodated will be: 40 65 YEARS Out of the 10 beds registered for learning disability (LD) up to 2 (two) may have an additional physical disability (PD). Out of the 10 beds registered for learning disability (LD) one may have dementia (DE) 9th May 2005 Date of last inspection Brief Description of the Service: Courthill House is a pleasant purpose built two storey residential home for up to ten people. It is situated in a residential area, close to a main road, Chipstead railway station and local shops. Residents bedrooms are single rooms and are provided on both floors. There are a variety of communal spaces, consisting of two sitting rooms, one dining room and an activity room. Access to the first floor is by lift and stairs. The home has a large enclosed garden, situated to the rear of the property. There is off street parking for several cars at the front of the property. Courthill House DS0000013617.V255391.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 5 SUMMARY This is an overview of what the inspector found during the inspection. The inspection was the second of the year 2005/6 and was conducted by an inspector from CSCI. The manager is has been registered for some considerable time and was present for the inspection. Three members of staff were on duty and five of the Service Users in the home were spoken with. A tour of the premises took place and care, training; staff personnel and Health and Safety records were inspected. What the service does well: What has improved since the last inspection? What they could do better: It was observed that the home is operating extremely well and that all policies, procedures and practice issues are of a good standard. However it is required that the home’s service user guide is updated to provide more accurate information, and that photographs of staff are placed upon their personnel files. Please see requirements on Page 20. Courthill House DS0000013617.V255391.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 6 Please contact the provider for advice of actions taken in response to this inspection. The report of this inspection is available from enquiries@csci.gsi.gov.uk or by contacting your local CSCI office. Courthill House DS0000013617.V255391.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 7 DETAILS OF INSPECTOR FINDINGS CONTENTS Choice of Home (Standards 1–5) Individual Needs and Choices (Standards 6-10) Lifestyle (Standards 11-17) Personal and Healthcare Support (Standards 18-21) Concerns, Complaints and Protection (Standards 22-23) Environment (Standards 24-30) Staffing (Standards 31-36) Conduct and Management of the Home (Standards 37 – 43) Scoring of Outcomes Statutory Requirements Identified During the Inspection Courthill House DS0000013617.V255391.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 8 Choice of Home The intended outcomes for Standards 1 – 5 are: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Prospective service users have the information they need to make an informed choice about where to live. Prospective users’ individual aspirations and needs are assessed. Prospective service users know that the home that they will choose will meet their needs and aspirations. Prospective service users have an opportunity to visit and to “test drive” the home. Each service user has an individual written contract or statement of terms and conditions with the home. The Commission consider Standard 2 the key standard to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): 1,2, 3 4 and 5 Service users are admitted only following a full assessment undertaken by the manager who was able to demonstrate the homes capacity to meet the assessed needs. EVIDENCE: The home had a comprehensive statement of purpose, which accurately depicted the services provided by the home. Service users were very complimentary about the care they received and considered the home met their needs well. All potential service users are assessed prior to admission. It was reported that the service only admits new service users based on an assessment of needs, and appropriateness of placement The initial assessment was used to form the basis of the care plan and the support plan, which identified the actions that carers should follow to assist an individual living at the home. Service Users Tenancy agreements clearly set out the rights and responsibilities of the Service Users including their legal rights, and these agreements also discussed the responsibilities of the service toward the Service User. The home has produced a comprehensive Statement of Purpose and Service Users Guide, which now requires some updating. The home manager carries out assessments of prospective service users. Courthill House DS0000013617.V255391.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 9 Overall care plans were very well documented The organisation’s policy on transitional arrangements and admission process is detailed in the Statement of Purpose and Service Users Guide Courthill House DS0000013617.V255391.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 10 Individual Needs and Choices The intended outcomes for Standards 6 – 10 are: 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Service users know their assessed and changing needs and personal goals are reflected in their individual Plan. Service users make decisions about their lives with assistance as needed. Service users are consulted on, and participate in, all aspects of life in the home. Service users are supported to take risks as part of an independent lifestyle. Service users know that information about them is handled appropriately, and that their confidences are kept. The Commission considers Standards 6, 7 and 9 the key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 The systems for Service User consultation are good with a variety of evidence that indicates Service Users views are both sought and acted upon. EVIDENCE: Each service user has a care plan in place, which is detailed and covers the assessed needs of the service user. Care plans reflect input from other support agencies such as health and social care. Extensive care plans have been drawn up, with the help of the service user wherever possible and relatives/representatives. Care plans were well documented and highlighted all areas of care needs for each service user. All care plans showed evidence of regular reviews. Risk assessments were in place where appropriate. Courthill House DS0000013617.V255391.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 11 During the inspection it was evident that staff respect the Service Users’ right to make decisions. Evidence was provided with examples of the Service Users’ opportunities to participate in the day-to-day running of the home e.g. helping with food shopping, assisting with meal preparation. Staff enabled Service Users to take responsible risks - wherever possible – and this was clearly documented in each individual care plan. Risk assessments were being carried out as/when necessary and existing ones regularly updated. The risk assessments covered a range of incidents including outings and activities that the Service Users participate in. Courthill House DS0000013617.V255391.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 12 Lifestyle The intended outcomes for Standards 11 - 17 are: 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. Service users have opportunities for personal development. Service users are able to take part in age, peer and culturally appropriate activities. Service users are part of the local community. Service users engage in appropriate leisure activities. Service users have appropriate personal, family and sexual relationships. Service users’ rights are respected and responsibilities recognised in their daily lives. Service users are offered a healthy diet and enjoy their meals and mealtimes. The Commission considers Standards 12, 13, 15, 16 and 17 the key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): 11, 12,13, 14, 15, 16 and 17 Activity programmes are varied and on the whole are designed to meet individual need. Links with the families, friends and the local community are good. EVIDENCE: All Service Users have full and varied activity programmes. Examination of the home’s records confirmed a high degree of personal empowerment and choices in services users daily lives. They were encouraged and supported in the use of community amenities and in maintaining relationships with friends and families. Service users attend various day centre and adult education activities. A different variety of community-based activities are available. The activities programme was individualised in accordance with service users wishes and made appropriate use of college courses, community amenities and facilities. Service users had access to a range of appropriate leisure opportunities in accordance with individual preferences. They were encouraged to pursue individual interests and hobbies. Staff attempt to maintain links with Service Users’ families. Courthill House DS0000013617.V255391.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 13 There are no restrictions in terms of visiting times. There was evidence in the care plans that service users are supported to be as independent as possible, and are free to make decisions where possible. The service users were free to move around the home consistent with individual risk assessments in place. Courthill House DS0000013617.V255391.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 14 Personal and Healthcare Support The intended outcomes for Standards 18 - 21 are: 18. 19. 20. 21. Service users receive personal support in the way they prefer and require. Service users’ physical and emotional health needs are met. Service users retain, administer and control their own medication where appropriate, and are protected by the home’s policies and procedures for dealing with medicines. The ageing, illness and death of a service user are handled with respect and as the individual would wish. The Commission considers Standards 18, 19, and 20 the key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): 18, 19 and 20 The healthcare needs of Service Users are well met with evidence of good consultation with other professionals taking place on a regular basis. EVIDENCE: The home had adopted a key worker system and each individual service user had a key worker who knew them and their family well. The key worker with support from the management team was responsible for developing and reviewing the service users’ care plan. Staff ensured that specialist support was provided where necessary. All service users are registered with the local GP. A local surgery provides health care to the service users, which includes health checks, continent assessment and some staff training. The arrangements for all aspects of administration of medication appeared to be satisfactory. Medicines for each service user were recorded and stored accordingly in line with the RPS (Royal Pharmaceutical Society) guidelines. Courthill House DS0000013617.V255391.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 15 Concerns, Complaints and Protection The intended outcomes for Standards 22 – 23 are: 22. 23. Service users feel their views are listened to and acted on. Service users are protected from abuse, neglect and self-harm. The Commission considers Standards 22, and 23 the key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): 22 and 23 The home has a satisfactory complaints system that is made available to all Service Users and staff. EVIDENCE: The complaint procedure was compliant with statutory requirements. Complaint forms were available for recording complaints. Records demonstrated there had been no formal complaint received by the home or the regulator within the last twelve months. The organisation had its own adult protection policy and a copy of Surrey’s multi-agency vulnerable adult abuse procedure was available in the home. The subject of abuse was addressed within the staff induction programme. Up to date training in the Protection of Vulnerable Adults will be talking place on an ongoing basis. Courthill House DS0000013617.V255391.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 16 Environment The intended outcomes for Standards 24 – 30 are: 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. Service users live in a homely, comfortable and safe environment. Service users’ bedrooms suit their needs and lifestyles. Service users’ bedrooms promote their independence. Service users’ toilets and bathrooms provide sufficient privacy and meet their individual needs. Shared spaces complement and supplement service users’ individual rooms. Service users have the specialist equipment they require to maximise their independence. The home is clean and hygienic. The Commission considers Standards 24, and 30 the key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29 and 30 The standard of décor and equipment in this home is very good with evidence of improvement through continual maintenance and refurbishment. EVIDENCE: Overall the home was in good condition; appropriately decorated, well maintained and furnished to a high standard. The secluded garden is particularly attractive and of a large size, stocked with garden furniture. Some bedrooms were seen during the inspection. These were each highly personalised and individual in style. Most of the bedrooms had photographs and other items linked to the Service Users family life outside the home. There were sufficient bathrooms and toilets to meet the national minimum standard. The communal areas in the home were considered safe and accessible for the Service Users. Courthill House DS0000013617.V255391.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 17 Staffing The intended outcomes for Standards 31 – 36 are: 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. Service users benefit from clarity of staff roles and responsibilities. Service users are supported by competent and qualified staff. Service users are supported by an effective staff team. Service users are supported and protected by the home’s recruitment policy and practices. Service users’ individual and joint needs are met by appropriately trained staff. Service users benefit from well supported and supervised staff. The Commission considers Standards 32, 34 and 35 the key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 and 36 The manager is supported well by the senior staff in providing clear leadership throughout the home with all staff demonstrating an awareness of their roles and responsibilities. EVIDENCE: Staff spoken to at the day of the inspection had a good understanding of their job descriptions and their responsibilities and they were able to identify the roles of other members of staff in the hierarchy. Communication between staff was good. At the day of the inspection personnel files were seen and considered to be accurate. However photographs of staff need to be included on all personnel files. Please see requirements on page 20 of this report. All documents required by Schedule 2 of the Care Homes Regulations 2001 were available in individual files. Staff meetings are in place and are organised monthly. The manager gave evidence of a professional and comprehensive induction period for new members of staff. Staff confirmed that they receive training on a regular basis. Records were examined and evidence was found of a very full and varied training programme. All members of staff receive supervision on a regular 6 weekly basis. Courthill House DS0000013617.V255391.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 18 Conduct and Management of the Home The intended outcomes for Standards 37 – 43 are: 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. Service users benefit from a well run home. Service users benefit from the ethos, leadership and management approach of the home. Service users are confident their views underpin all self-monitoring, review and development by the home. Service users’ rights and best interests are safeguarded by the home’s policies and procedures. Service users’ rights and best interests are safeguarded by the home’s record keeping policies and procedures. The health, safety and welfare of service users are promoted and protected. Service users benefit from competent and accountable management of the service. The Commission considers Standards 37, 39, and 42 the key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 and 43 The manager has a clear development plan and vision for the home, which she has effectively communicated to the Service Users, staff and relatives. EVIDENCE: There is good leadership and consistent direction to staff in this home to ensure that Service Users receive consistent quality care. The manager is fully aware of the needs of the Service Users in the home and as such is able to communicate this to staff through regular staff meetings and individual supervision sessions. Courthill House DS0000013617.V255391.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 19 The manager illustrates a full commitment to the home and its Service Users. The frequency of staff meetings and informal supervision was indicative of an open and supportive atmosphere. Regulation 26 (Monthly visits by the proprietor) are undertaken and evidence was seen of their occurrence. Relevant policies and procedures were in place. Systems existed to demonstrate these had been communicated to staff. Also those of relevance to service users had been shared with them. Records examined included; care plans, medication procedures, staff meeting minutes, risk assessment policies and service user activity programmes. They were seen to be in good order. There were policies and procedures in place for the health, safety and welfare of service users and staff. Detailed policies and procedures were in place in relation to safe working practices. Staff were trained in First Aid, Food Hygiene and other aspects of Health and Safety. Courthill House DS0000013617.V255391.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 20 SCORING OF OUTCOMES This page summarises the assessment of the extent to which the National Minimum Standards for Care Homes for Adults 18-65 have been met and uses the following scale. The scale ranges from: 4 Standard Exceeded 2 Standard Almost Met (Commendable) (Minor Shortfalls) 3 Standard Met 1 Standard Not Met (No Shortfalls) (Major Shortfalls) “X” in the standard met box denotes standard not assessed on this occasion “N/A” in the standard met box denotes standard not applicable CHOICE OF HOME CONCERNS AND COMPLAINTS Standard No 1 2 3 4 5 Score 3 3 3 3 3 Standard No 22 23 Score 3 3 ENVIRONMENT INDIVIDUAL NEEDS AND CHOICES Standard No 6 7 8 9 10 Score 3 3 3 3 3 Standard No 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 STAFFING Score 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 LIFESTYLES Standard No Score 11 3 12 3 13 3 14 3 15 3 16 3 17 Standard No 31 32 33 34 35 36 Score 3 3 3 3 3 3 CONDUCT AND MANAGEMENT OF THE HOME 3 PERSONAL AND HEALTHCARE SUPPORT Standard No 18 19 20 21 Courthill House Score 3 3 3 3 Standard No 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 Score 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 DS0000013617.V255391.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 21 No Are there any outstanding requirements from the last inspection? STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS This section sets out the actions, which must be taken so that the registered person/s meets the Care Standards Act 2000, Care Homes Regulations 2001 and the National Minimum Standards. The Registered Provider(s) must comply with the given timescales. No. 1 Standard YA41.3 Regulation 19 Schedule 2 Timescale for action It is required that photographs of 30/11/05 staff are included on their personnel files Requirement RECOMMENDATIONS These recommendations relate to National Minimum Standards and are seen as good practice for the Registered Provider/s to consider carrying out. No. 1 Refer to Standard YA41 Good Practice Recommendations It is recommended that out of date information on all files be archived. Courthill House DS0000013617.V255391.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 22 Commission for Social Care Inspection Surrey Area Office The Wharf Abbey Mill Business Park Eashing Surrey GU7 2QN National Enquiry Line: 0845 015 0120 Email: enquiries@csci.gsi.gov.uk Web: www.csci.org.uk © This report is copyright Commission for Social Care Inspection (CSCI) and may only be used in its entirety. Extracts may not be used or reproduced without the express permission of CSCI Courthill House DS0000013617.V255391.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 23 - Please note that this information is included on www.bestcarehome.co.uk under license from the regulator. Re-publishing this information is in breach of the terms of use of that website. Discrete codes and changes have been inserted throughout the textual data shown on the site that will provide incontrovertable proof of copying in the event this information is re-published on other websites. The policy of www.bestcarehome.co.uk is to use all legal avenues to pursue such offenders, including recovery of costs. You have been warned!