CARE HOMES FOR OLDER PEOPLE
Engelberg Engelberg Ash Hill Compton Wolverhampton West Midlands WV3 3DR Lead Inspector
Mr Ian Harris Unannounced Inspection 4th July 2006 08:00
04/07/06 08:00
X10015.doc Version 1.40 Page 1 The Commission for Social Care Inspection aims to: • • • • Put the people who use social care first Improve services and stamp out bad practice Be an expert voice on social care Practise what we preach in our own organisation Reader Information
Document Purpose Author Audience Further copies from Copyright Inspection Report CSCI General Public 0870 240 7535 (telephone order line) This report is copyright Commission for Social Care Inspection (CSCI) and may only be used in its entirety. Extracts may not be used or reproduced without the express permission of CSCI www.csci.org.uk Internet address Engelberg DS0000030104.V297403.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 2 This is a report of an inspection to assess whether services are meeting the needs of people who use them. The legal basis for conducting inspections is the Care Standards Act 2000 and the relevant National Minimum Standards for this establishment are those for Care Homes for Older People. They can be found at www.dh.gov.uk or obtained from The Stationery Office (TSO) PO Box 29, St Crispins, Duke Street, Norwich, NR3 1GN. Tel: 0870 600 5522. Online ordering: www.tso.co.uk/bookshop This report is a public document. Extracts may not be used or reproduced without the prior permission of the Commission for Social Care Inspection. Engelberg DS0000030104.V297403.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 3 SERVICE INFORMATION
Name of service Engelberg Address Engelberg Ash Hill Compton Wolverhampton West Midlands WV3 3DR 01902 420613 01902 713587 Telephone number Fax number Email address Provider Web address Name of registered provider(s)/company (if applicable) Name of registered manager (if applicable) Type of registration No. of places registered (if applicable) home.fxg@mha.org.uk Methodist Homes for the Aged Angela Jeavons Care Home 32 Category(ies) of Old age, not falling within any other category registration, with number (32) of places Engelberg DS0000030104.V297403.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 4 SERVICE INFORMATION
Conditions of registration: 1. 2. Females 60 years and above, males 65 years and above. Maximum of 2 residents with Mild Dementia. Date of last inspection 8th September 2005 Brief Description of the Service: Engelberg is registered to care for 32 older people. The building has been adapted to provide for the needs of physically frail older people A new extension provides additional accommodation. There are thirty-two single rooms, twelve of which have an en suite facility. The home is situated in a very peaceful area of Compton in Wolverhampton, but is within easy reach of the city centre and local facilities. The home has a large dining room and communal lounge in addition to a second lounge that is used for worship. There is a large and very well maintained garden that is accessable to all the residents. Engelberg DS0000030104.V297403.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 5 SUMMARY
This is an overview of what the inspector found during the inspection. This inspection was an unannounced key inspection and took place over 5. hours. During the inspection a tour of the premises took place and staff and care records were inspected. Also staff rotas and general records regarding the maintenance of the home were checked. 5 members of staff 8 residents were spoken to. It was noted that the fees range between, £399 to £476. On the day of inspection the atmosphere within the home was found to be warm, friendly and comfortable with contented residents. All the residents spoken who could express themselves in a meaning full way expressed their satisfaction with the care they received and there were comments as follows “ the food is good here” “The staff are very kind” “ I’m very settled and I like my room this is a very nice home.” “I like the company”. What the service does well: What has improved since the last inspection?
There have been considerable improvements made to the home’s environment since the last inspection. The dining room has been redecorated and new floor covering laid, 9 bedrooms have been redecorated and 8 have been fitted with new carpets and the exterior of the building has been redecorated, which has greatly improved the environment for the residents
Engelberg DS0000030104.V297403.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 6 What they could do better: Please contact the provider for advice of actions taken in response to this inspection. The report of this inspection is available from enquiries@csci.gsi.gov.uk or by contacting your local CSCI office. Engelberg DS0000030104.V297403.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 7 DETAILS OF INSPECTOR FINDINGS CONTENTS
Choice of Home (Standards 1–6) Health and Personal Care (Standards 7-11) Daily Life and Social Activities (Standards 12-15) Complaints and Protection (Standards 16-18) Environment (Standards 19-26) Staffing (Standards 27-30) Management and Administration (Standards 31-38) Scoring of Outcomes Statutory Requirements Identified During the Inspection Engelberg DS0000030104.V297403.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 8 Choice of Home
The intended outcomes for Standards 1 – 6 are: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Prospective service users have the information they need to make an informed choice about where to live. Each service user has a written contract/ statement of terms and conditions with the home. No service user moves into the home without having had his/her needs assessed and been assured that these will be met. Service users and their representatives know that the home they enter will meet their needs. Prospective service users and their relatives and friends have an opportunity to visit and assess the quality, facilities and suitability of the home. Service users assessed and referred solely for intermediate care are helped to maximise their independence and return home. The Commission considers Standards 3 and 6 the key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): 3 and 6 Appropriate assessments of need are in place and are carried out. The home does not provide intermediate care they only provide short stay and introductory stays when the home has a vacancy. The quality outcome in this area is good. This judgment has been made using available evidence including a visit to this service. EVIDENCE: There is evidence on the resident’s files that all the residents who are funded by the Local Authority undergo a full multi-disciplinary assessment prior to admission. The residents, who are self funding are assessed by the Care Manager, using the Methodist Homes assessment forms. All the residents are permanent. The home does not provide intermediate care. Engelberg DS0000030104.V297403.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 9 Health and Personal Care
The intended outcomes for Standards 7 – 11 are: 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. The service user’s health, personal and social care needs are set out in an individual plan of care. Service users’ health care needs are fully met. Service users, where appropriate, are responsible for their own medication, and are protected by the home’s policies and procedures for dealing with medicines. Service users feel they are treated with respect and their right to privacy is upheld. Service users are assured that at the time of their death, staff will treat them and their family with care, sensitivity and respect. The Commission considers Standards 7, 8, 9 and 10 the key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): 7, 8, 9, and 10 Each resident has a comprehensive, individual care plan that is reviewed on a monthly basis. The home has good contact with local G.P. s. local hospitals and paramedical services, which ensures that resident’s health needs are met. The systems for the administration of medication are good with clear and comprehensive recording arrangements being in place to ensure resident’s medication needs are met. The quality outcome in this area is good. This judgment has been made using available evidence including a visit to this service. EVIDENCE: The home provides a comprehensive Care Plan for each individual resident based on the initial assessment. The Care Plans are drawn up by the Care Staff in consultation with the resident and their family. There was evidence on the files to show the care Plans are being carried out and reviewed on a monthly basis.
Engelberg DS0000030104.V297403.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 10 The home is well supported by local G. P. s. and all of the paramedical services. Wherever possible, the residents are encouraged to retain their own G. P s, Opticians, and Dentists. It was noted that if the resident has moved out of their area the Care Manager ensures that, these services are provided by local practitioners. The records indicate that resident’s medical needs are being met. Medication is administered by means of a Boot’s monitored dosage system. The system appears to be working very well. The home receives good support from the Boot’s pharmacist who does a three monthly audit of the homes medication. All care Senior Staff have been trained to use the system before they are allowed to administer medication. The home has very good policies and procedures, which are used as an integral part of the staff induction programme. Engelberg DS0000030104.V297403.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 11 Daily Life and Social Activities
The intended outcomes for Standards 12 - 15 are: 12. 13. 14. 15. Service users find the lifestyle experienced in the home matches their expectations and preferences, and satisfies their social, cultural, religious and recreational interests and needs. Service users maintain contact with family/ friends/ representatives and the local community as they wish. Service users are helped to exercise choice and control over their lives. Service users receive a wholesome appealing balanced diet in pleasing surroundings at times convenient to them. The Commission considers all of the above key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): 12, 13, and 15 The home provides a stimulating experience for the residents where they are encouraged to maintain their independence as much as possible The home provides a good range of social activities within and outside the home designed to the capabilities of the residents The meals in the home are good offering both choice and variety and also catering for special dietary needs The quality outcome in this area is excellent. This judgment has been made using available evidence including a visit to this service. EVIDENCE: The routines and activities within the home are flexible and are built around the needs of the residents. There was also evidence to show that staff consult the residents regarding the choice of meals and activities within the home. There are regular residents meetings and the cook consults the individual residents on a daily basis regarding the menu and their personal preferences. The key-workers also identify interests that the residents wish to pursue. A regular programme of musical evenings, Art and Craft sessions, board- games and sing-a-longs is organised within the home. There are monthly church outings, where residents have the opportunity to visit country churches where tea is provided. Outings to the theatre and a canal trip have been arranged. During the inspection many of the residents were delighted is telling me about
Engelberg DS0000030104.V297403.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 12 the wonderful 40th anniversary celebration party they and their visitors had all enjoyed. Engelberg DS0000030104.V297403.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 13 Complaints and Protection
The intended outcomes for Standards 16 - 18 are: 16. 17. 18. Service users and their relatives and friends are confident that their complaints will be listened to, taken seriously and acted upon. Service users’ legal rights are protected. Service users are protected from abuse. The Commission considers Standards 16 and 18 the key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): 16 and 18 The home has a satisfactory complaints system and there is evidence that residents’ and their families feel that their views are listened to and acted upon The home has good policies and procedures regarding protection from abuse, which includes a whistle blowing policy. The quality outcome in this area is good. This judgment has been made using available evidence including a visit to this service. EVIDENCE: The home has a very good complaints procedure and all complaints are recorded in a, complains book. Residents and their families are given a copy, of the complaints procedure at admission and there are copies readily available in the reception area. It was noted that no complaints have been recorded since the last inspection. However it is noted that in the passed complaints have been dealt with appropriately. The home has good policies and procedures regarding Restraint, dealing with Aggressive Behaviour and Prevention of Abuse, which includes, a WhistleBlowing policy. These issues are also covered in the induction and N.V.Q. training, which the Staff are undertaking. Engelberg DS0000030104.V297403.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 14 Environment
The intended outcomes for Standards 19 – 26 are: 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. Service users live in a safe, well-maintained environment. Service users have access to safe and comfortable indoor and outdoor communal facilities. Service users have sufficient and suitable lavatories and washing facilities. Service users have the specialist equipment they require to maximise their independence. Service users’ own rooms suit their needs. Service users live in safe, comfortable bedrooms with their own possessions around them. Service users live in safe, comfortable surroundings. The home is clean, pleasant and hygienic. The Commission considers Standards 19 and 26 the key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): 19 and 26 The standard of the environment within the home and the garden is very high providing the residents with a very attractive, comfortable, homely and safe place to live. The home was found to be clean tidy and free of unpleasant odour, which ensures the residents have pleasant living conditions. The quality outcome in this area is good. This judgment has been made using available evidence including a visit to this service. EVIDENCE: The home is long established and has undergone alterations over the years in order to provide appropriate accommodation for older people. The home is maintained to a very high standard, as are the gardens and grounds and provides a very comfortable homely and safe atmosphere. It was noted that since the last inspection the dining room has been redecorated and new floor covering laid, 9 bedrooms have been redecorated and 8 have been fitted with new carpets and the exterior of the building has been redecorated, which has improved the environment for the residents.
Engelberg DS0000030104.V297403.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 15 The resident’s bedrooms have been personalised with the residents’ own personal possessions. This gives the appearance of a very comfortable environment. The home is furnished to a high standard throughout. All the bedrooms are well furnished and close attention has been paid to detail. The home was found to be clean and tidy and free from odour. The home has good policies and procedures regarding infection control and all the staff have received training in food hygiene All staff appeared to be conscious of the dangers of cross infection. Engelberg DS0000030104.V297403.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 16 Staffing
The intended outcomes for Standards 27 – 30 are: 27. 28. 29. 30. Service users’ needs are met by the numbers and skill mix of staff. Service users are in safe hands at all times. Service users are supported and protected by the home’s recruitment policy and practices. Staff are trained and competent to do their jobs. The Commission consider all the above are key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): 27, 28, 29, and 30 The home is well staffed with adequate numbers and skill mix of staff. The staff have a very good understanding of the residents support needs. The home has good policies and procedures regarding the recruitment of staff, which includes all the appropriate staff checks and references. The quality outcome in this area is good. This judgment has been made using available evidence including a visit to this service. EVIDENCE: The inspection of staff rotas and discussions with staff indicated that the home is well staffed. There is a good balance within the staff group, which includes experience, mature and younger staff who are embarking on a new career. The home operates an acceptable procedure and has registered with the Social Care Association in order to complete the appropriate checks on staff. There was evidence within the home that all the checks are being carried out. All staff, at the home, are committed to developing their knowledge and skills through training and have regular opportunities to do so through external and internal training activities. The home has a programme of N.V.Q. training in order to meet the minimum standard. Also the care staff have attended courses on Safe handling of medication, Risk assessment, Dementia care, Moving and lifting, Abuse Awareness, Challenging Behaviour and Fire Prevention. Engelberg DS0000030104.V297403.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 17 Management and Administration
The intended outcomes for Standards 31 – 38 are: 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. Service users live in a home which is run and managed by a person who is fit to be in charge, of good character and able to discharge his or her responsibilities fully. Service users benefit from the ethos, leadership and management approach of the home. The home is run in the best interests of service users. Service users are safeguarded by the accounting and financial procedures of the home. Service users’ financial interests are safeguarded. Staff are appropriately supervised. Service users’ rights and best interests are safeguarded by the home’s record keeping, policies and procedures. The health, safety and welfare of service users and staff are promoted and protected. The Commission considers Standards 31, 33, 35 and 38 the key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): 31, 33, 35 and 38 The home is a well managed, where service users interests and welfare is promoted. The home is operating a good system to assist residents with the safe handling and keeping of their personal finances and good records are being kept of all transactions made. All the general records that was inspected, were found to be well ordered and maintained. The home has good policies and procedures regarding Health and safety The quality outcome in this area is good. This judgment has been made using available evidence including a visit to this service. EVIDENCE: The Care Manager has been in post for a good number of years and is qualified in both practice and management and has considerable experience in caring for older people, in a residential home setting. There are clear lines of accountability within the home and the manager is well supported by the management committee.
Engelberg DS0000030104.V297403.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 18 Observations made and discussions with residents and staff indcated that the Care Manager is very approachable and operates an open door policy and is proactive in meeting all the residents on a daily basis. The staff and residents who could express themselves stated that they are happy to approach the Care Manager with any problems they might have and are confident that they will be resolved. The routines and activities within the home are flexible and built around the needs of the residents. There was also evidence to show that staff consult with the residents regarding the choice of meals and activities within the home. There are regular resident meetings where residents are consulted about menus and entertainment etc. Also the Key-Worker system in operation is designed to ensure residents’ wishes are responded to. All the records and administrative procedures within the home that were, inspected were found to be well ordered and maintained. The home has a good heath and safety policy and all staff are aware of their responsibilities regarding these issues and a number of staff have received training on these issues. All safety equipment is check and well maintained. Engelberg DS0000030104.V297403.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 19 SCORING OF OUTCOMES
This page summarises the assessment of the extent to which the National Minimum Standards for Care Homes for Older People have been met and uses the following scale. The scale ranges from:
4 Standard Exceeded 2 Standard Almost Met (Commendable) (Minor Shortfalls) 3 Standard Met 1 Standard Not Met (No Shortfalls) (Major Shortfalls) “X” in the standard met box denotes standard not assessed on this occasion “N/A” in the standard met box denotes standard not applicable
CHOICE OF HOME Standard No Score 1 2 3 4 5 6 ENVIRONMENT Standard No Score 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 X X 3 X X 3 HEALTH AND PERSONAL CARE Standard No Score 7 3 8 3 9 3 10 3 11 X DAILY LIFE AND SOCIAL ACTIVITIES Standard No Score 12 4 13 3 14 3 15 3 COMPLAINTS AND PROTECTION Standard No Score 16 3 17 X 18 3 3 X X X X X X 3 STAFFING Standard No Score 27 3 28 3 29 3 30 4 MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION Standard No 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 Score 4 x 3 x 3 x x 3 Engelberg DS0000030104.V297403.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 20 Are there any outstanding requirements from the last inspection? STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS This section sets out the actions, which must be taken so that the registered person/s meets the Care Standards Act 2000, Care Homes Regulations 2001 and the National Minimum Standards. The Registered Provider(s) must comply with the given timescales. No. Standard Regulation Requirement Timescale for action RECOMMENDATIONS These recommendations relate to National Minimum Standards and are seen as good practice for the Registered Provider/s to consider carrying out. No. Refer to Standard Good Practice Recommendations Engelberg DS0000030104.V297403.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 21 Commission for Social Care Inspection Wolverhampton Area Office 2nd Floor St. Davids Court Union Street Wolverhampton WV1 3JE National Enquiry Line: 0845 015 0120 Email: enquiries@csci.gsi.gov.uk Web: www.csci.org.uk
© This report is copyright Commission for Social Care Inspection (CSCI) and may only be used in its entirety. Extracts may not be used or reproduced without the express permission of CSCI Engelberg DS0000030104.V297403.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 22 - Please note that this information is included on www.bestcarehome.co.uk under license from the regulator. Re-publishing this information is in breach of the terms of use of that website. Discrete codes and changes have been inserted throughout the textual data shown on the site that will provide incontrovertable proof of copying in the event this information is re-published on other websites. The policy of www.bestcarehome.co.uk is to use all legal avenues to pursue such offenders, including recovery of costs. You have been warned!