Inspection on 05/01/06 for Juniper

This inspection was carried out on 5th January 2006.

CSCI has not published a star rating for this report, though using similar criteria we estimate that the report is Good. The way we rate inspection reports is consistent for all houses, though please be aware that this may be different from an official CSCI judgement.

The inspector made no statutory requirements on the home as a result of this inspection and there were no outstanding actions from the previous inspection report.

Other inspections for this house

Juniper 21/10/08

Juniper 02/11/06

Juniper 16/08/05

Juniper 14/02/05

Juniper 09/09/04

Similar services:

Thorndene

Insight - Eastchurch

Southfields

Magenta

Seabourne House

33 St John`s Church Road

Dovedale Court

Lyncol House

Extracts from inspection reports are licensed from CQC, this page was updated on 09/07/2008.

CARE HOME ADULTS 18-65 Juniper The Forstal Mersham Ashford Kent TN25 6NU Lead Inspector Mrs Sue Gaskell Announced Inspection 5th January 2006 10:00 Juniper DS0000023222.V262957.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 1 The Commission for Social Care Inspection aims to: • • • • Put the people who use social care first Improve services and stamp out bad practice Be an expert voice on social care Practise what we preach in our own organisation Reader Information Document Purpose Author Audience Further copies from Copyright Inspection Report CSCI General Public 0870 240 7535 (telephone order line) This report is copyright Commission for Social Care Inspection (CSCI) and may only be used in its entirety. Extracts may not be used or reproduced without the express permission of CSCI www.csci.org.uk Internet address Juniper DS0000023222.V262957.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 2 This is a report of an inspection to assess whether services are meeting the needs of people who use them. The legal basis for conducting inspections is the Care Standards Act 2000 and the relevant National Minimum Standards for this establishment are those for Care Homes for Adults 18-65. They can be found at www.dh.gov.uk or obtained from The Stationery Office (TSO) PO Box 29, St Crispins, Duke Street, Norwich, NR3 1GN. Tel: 0870 600 5522. Online ordering: www.tso.co.uk/bookshop This report is a public document. Extracts may not be used or reproduced without the prior permission of the Commission for Social Care Inspection. Juniper DS0000023222.V262957.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 3 SERVICE INFORMATION Name of service Juniper Address The Forstal Mersham Ashford Kent TN25 6NU 01233 720846 Telephone number Fax number Email address Provider Web address Name of registered provider(s)/company (if applicable) Name of registered manager (if applicable) Type of registration No. of places registered (if applicable) juniper@counticare.co.uk Counticare Limited Mrs Marie Danielle Short Care Home 3 Category(ies) of Learning disability (3) registration, with number of places Juniper DS0000023222.V262957.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 4 SERVICE INFORMATION Conditions of registration: 1. Ms Short to complete Registered Managers award by 01/04/2005. Date of last inspection 16th August 2005 Brief Description of the Service: Juniper provides residential care to up to 3 adults with a learning disability. The home is owned by Counticare Ltd, a provider of approximately 14 services throughout the East Kent area. The Home is situated in the village of Mersham, some 15 minutes drive from the town of Ashford where there is a variety of amenities such as shops, swimming pool, a cinema, churches, pubs, clubs and colleges. The home has access to a minibus and other vehicles owned by the company. Residents also make use of the day centre owned by the company. Juniper is a detached bungalow which comprises individual bedrooms for each resident, a lounge, kitchen, conservatory/dining room, laundry room and office. There is a small enclosed rear garden with seating and a barbecue area, and there is a parking area to the front of the property. Staffing comprises the registered manager and support staff. Juniper DS0000023222.V262957.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 5 SUMMARY This is an overview of what the inspector found during the inspection. This announced inspection was carried out over approximately 4 hours. The Inspector toured the building, examined a number of records, policies and procedures and spoke with the Acting Manager and 2 other members of staff. The Home also submitted a pre-inspection questionnaire. 2 of the 3 residents living in the home showed the Inspector their bedrooms, spoke about their activities and daily routines, and said that they like living in the home. What the service does well: What has improved since the last inspection? What they could do better: Please contact the provider for advice of actions taken in response to this inspection. The report of this inspection is available from enquiries@csci.gsi.gov.uk or by contacting your local CSCI office. Juniper DS0000023222.V262957.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 6 DETAILS OF INSPECTOR FINDINGS CONTENTS Choice of Home (Standards 1–5) Individual Needs and Choices (Standards 6-10) Lifestyle (Standards 11-17) Personal and Healthcare Support (Standards 18-21) Concerns, Complaints and Protection (Standards 22-23) Environment (Standards 24-30) Staffing (Standards 31-36) Conduct and Management of the Home (Standards 37 – 43) Scoring of Outcomes Statutory Requirements Identified During the Inspection Juniper DS0000023222.V262957.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 7 Choice of Home The intended outcomes for Standards 1 – 5 are: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Prospective service users have the information they need to make an informed choice about where to live. Prospective users’ individual aspirations and needs are assessed. Prospective service users know that the home that they will choose will meet their needs and aspirations. Prospective service users have an opportunity to visit and to “test drive” the home. Each service user has an individual written contract or statement of terms and conditions with the home. The Commission consider Standard 2 the key standard to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): 2 Residents’ healthcare, social needs and aspirations are assessed and met. EVIDENCE: Whilst no new residents have been admitted since the last announced inspection, there is a sound preadmission assessment procedure with input from the prospective residents, Care Managers, families and other health care professionals. Juniper DS0000023222.V262957.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 8 Individual Needs and Choices The intended outcomes for Standards 6 – 10 are: 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Service users know their assessed and changing needs and personal goals are reflected in their individual Plan. Service users make decisions about their lives with assistance as needed. Service users are consulted on, and participate in, all aspects of life in the home. Service users are supported to take risks as part of an independent lifestyle. Service users know that information about them is handled appropriately, and that their confidences are kept. The Commission considers Standards 6, 7 and 9 the key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): 6,7 and 9 The health, general care and social needs of residents are well met and residents are consulted and encouraged to contribute to any decisions that affect their lives. Residents are supported in taking risks in the daily domestic and social activities that are part of an independent lifestyle. EVIDENCE: All of the care plans include details on short and long term goals and how the home will assist residents in achieving their goals, and these are reviewed regularly. Residents have key workers who monitor their individual needs and activities and help them understand the contents of their care plans. One resident completes his own daily record sheet with the assistance of staff. Risk assessments are prepared and include specific guidelines. Juniper DS0000023222.V262957.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 9 Lifestyle The intended outcomes for Standards 11 - 17 are: 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. Service users have opportunities for personal development. Service users are able to take part in age, peer and culturally appropriate activities. Service users are part of the local community. Service users engage in appropriate leisure activities. Service users have appropriate personal, family and sexual relationships. Service users’ rights are respected and responsibilities recognised in their daily lives. Service users are offered a healthy diet and enjoy their meals and mealtimes. The Commission considers Standards 12, 13, 15, 16 and 17 the key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): 11,12,13,15,16,and 17 There are good opportunities for personal development and social activities on a daily basis, special days out or through work experience. Meals in the home are good, offering a healthy, nutritious diet with choice and variety. EVIDENCE: Residents have access to a wide range of activities during the day and during the evenings. Some activities are carried out with the assistance of staff but residents are encouraged to be independent whenever appropriate. The home has been pro-active in arranging for work experience for one resident and the resident said that he really enjoys this work. The menus were seen to be varied and appropriate for a balanced diet. Staff said that residents are encouraged to make suggestions about the menus. Juniper DS0000023222.V262957.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 10 Personal and Healthcare Support The intended outcomes for Standards 18 - 21 are: 18. 19. 20. 21. Service users receive personal support in the way they prefer and require. Service users’ physical and emotional health needs are met. Service users retain, administer and control their own medication where appropriate, and are protected by the home’s policies and procedures for dealing with medicines. The ageing, illness and death of a service user are handled with respect and as the individual would wish. The Commission considers Standards 18, 19, and 20 the key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): 18,19 and 20 Residents healthcare and social and emotional needs are constantly monitored and met. The medication management systems are generally sound but the location of the storage may need reviewing. EVIDENCE: The care plans include in depth monitoring of residents’ care needs. Staff confirmed that they have received appropriate training in the administering or medication and the records were clear and current. The storage of medication is secure and appropriate to a homely environment but may need reviewing at some stage. Staff interviewed referred to the importance of offering personal support in such a way as to preserve residents’ rights and encourage their independence. Juniper DS0000023222.V262957.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 11 Concerns, Complaints and Protection The intended outcomes for Standards 22 – 23 are: 22. 23. Service users feel their views are listened to and acted on. Service users are protected from abuse, neglect and self-harm. The Commission considers Standards 22, and 23 the key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): 22 and 23 The home has a satisfactory complaints process and residents are protected from harm or neglect. The home makes every effort to seek residents’ views. EVIDENCE: Residents said that they are able to talk to staff about anything they are not happy with and it was apparent that staff have a good rapport with residents. All complaints are recorded, together with the outcomes. The home has adult abuse procedures in place and staff, including occasional staff, confirmed that they have received training on adult protection awareness. Juniper DS0000023222.V262957.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 12 Environment The intended outcomes for Standards 24 – 30 are: 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. Service users live in a homely, comfortable and safe environment. Service users’ bedrooms suit their needs and lifestyles. Service users’ bedrooms promote their independence. Service users’ toilets and bathrooms provide sufficient privacy and meet their individual needs. Shared spaces complement and supplement service users’ individual rooms. Service users have the specialist equipment they require to maximise their independence. The home is clean and hygienic. The Commission considers Standards 24, and 30 the key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): 24 and 30 The standard of the environment within the home is good, providing residents with a homely, comfortable and safe place to live. The home is clean and hygienic. EVIDENCE: The home has been renovated and extended in the last 2 years and provides residents with good sized bedrooms and a spacious communal area. All areas of the home were seen to be clean, comfortably furnished, and well maintained. Juniper DS0000023222.V262957.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 13 Staffing The intended outcomes for Standards 31 – 36 are: 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. Service users benefit from clarity of staff roles and responsibilities. Service users are supported by competent and qualified staff. Service users are supported by an effective staff team. Service users are supported and protected by the home’s recruitment policy and practices. Service users’ individual and joint needs are met by appropriately trained staff. Service users benefit from well supported and supervised staff. The Commission considers Standards 32, 34 and 35 the key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): 32,34,35 and 36 Residents benefit from a competent, appropriately trained and well supported staff team. Residents are protected by sound recruitment practices. EVIDENCE: There is adequate staffing during the day and at night to respond to residents needs, and there is also an emergency on call system. The staff confirmed that CRB, and POVA checks are carried out and references obtained and verified. Staff have access to a range of training in core issues and for specific needs. All of the staff spoken to said that they enjoy working in the home and that the high level of morale is due to the good support from management. Juniper DS0000023222.V262957.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 14 Conduct and Management of the Home The intended outcomes for Standards 37 – 43 are: 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. Service users benefit from a well run home. Service users benefit from the ethos, leadership and management approach of the home. Service users are confident their views underpin all self-monitoring, review and development by the home. Service users’ rights and best interests are safeguarded by the home’s policies and procedures. Service users’ rights and best interests are safeguarded by the home’s record keeping policies and procedures. The health, safety and welfare of service users are promoted and protected. Service users benefit from competent and accountable management of the service. The Commission considers Standards 37, 39, and 42 the key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): 37,39 and 42 The home regularly reviews aspects of its performance through self review, and consultation with residents, their relatives or representatives and staff. There are clear and comprehensive systems in place to ensure that the health, safety and welfare of residents is protected and promoted. EVIDENCE: Staff informed the Inspector that residents are consulted whenever possible on policies, procedures and the general running of the home and their was written evidence in the file to support this. All records, policies and procedures relating to health and safety, such as risk assessments and fire alarm/lighting testing, were clear and current. The acting manager and staff showed a good awareness of health and safety issues. Juniper DS0000023222.V262957.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 15 SCORING OF OUTCOMES This page summarises the assessment of the extent to which the National Minimum Standards for Care Homes for Adults 18-65 have been met and uses the following scale. The scale ranges from: 4 Standard Exceeded 2 Standard Almost Met (Commendable) (Minor Shortfalls) 3 Standard Met 1 Standard Not Met (No Shortfalls) (Major Shortfalls) “X” in the standard met box denotes standard not assessed on this occasion “N/A” in the standard met box denotes standard not applicable CHOICE OF HOME CONCERNS AND COMPLAINTS Standard No 1 2 3 4 5 Score X 3 X X X Standard No 22 23 Score 3 3 ENVIRONMENT INDIVIDUAL NEEDS AND CHOICES Standard No 6 7 8 9 10 Score 4 3 X 3 X Standard No 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 STAFFING Score 3 X X X X X 3 LIFESTYLES Standard No Score 11 4 12 3 13 3 14 X 15 3 16 3 17 Standard No 31 32 33 34 35 36 Score X 3 X 3 3 4 CONDUCT AND MANAGEMENT OF THE HOME 3 PERSONAL AND HEALTHCARE SUPPORT Standard No 18 19 20 21 Juniper Score 3 4 3 X Standard No 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 Score 3 X 3 X X X 3 DS0000023222.V262957.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 16 no Are there any outstanding requirements from the last inspection? STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS This section sets out the actions, which must be taken so that the registered person/s meets the Care Standards Act 2000, Care Homes Regulations 2001 and the National Minimum Standards. The Registered Provider(s) must comply with the given timescales. No. Standard Regulation Requirement Timescale for action RECOMMENDATIONS These recommendations relate to National Minimum Standards and are seen as good practice for the Registered Provider/s to consider carrying out. No. Refer to Standard Good Practice Recommendations Juniper DS0000023222.V262957.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 17 Commission for Social Care Inspection Kent and Medway Area Office 11th Floor International House Dover Place Ashford Kent TN23 1HU National Enquiry Line: 0845 015 0120 Email: enquiries@csci.gsi.gov.uk Web: www.csci.org.uk © This report is copyright Commission for Social Care Inspection (CSCI) and may only be used in its entirety. Extracts may not be used or reproduced without the express permission of CSCI Juniper DS0000023222.V262957.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 18 - Please note that this information is included on www.bestcarehome.co.uk under license from the regulator. Re-publishing this information is in breach of the terms of use of that website. Discrete codes and changes have been inserted throughout the textual data shown on the site that will provide incontrovertable proof of copying in the event this information is re-published on other websites. The policy of www.bestcarehome.co.uk is to use all legal avenues to pursue such offenders, including recovery of costs. You have been warned!