Inspection on 19/07/06 for The Crescent

This inspection was carried out on 19th July 2006.

CSCI has not published a star rating for this report, though using similar criteria we estimate that the report is Adequate. The way we rate inspection reports is consistent for all houses, though please be aware that this may be different from an official CSCI judgement.

The inspector found no outstanding requirements from the previous inspection report, but made 1 statutory requirements (actions the home must comply with) as a result of this inspection.

Other inspections for this house

The Crescent 02/10/07

The Crescent 19/12/05

The Crescent 26/07/05

The Crescent 19/10/04

The Crescent 05/05/04

Similar services:

Trevaylor Manor

Stallcombe House

Stroud Lodge

The Woodmill

Woodland Vale

Bolealler House

Claremont Nursing Home

Althea Park House

Extracts from inspection reports are licensed from CQC, this page was updated on 09/07/2008.

CARE HOME ADULTS 18-65 The Crescent 1 Island Crescent Newquay Cornwall TR7 1DZ Lead Inspector Mike Stokes Key unannounced Inspection 19th July 2006 10:00 The Crescent DS0000009012.V299014.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 1 The Commission for Social Care Inspection aims to: • • • • Put the people who use social care first Improve services and stamp out bad practice Be an expert voice on social care Practise what we preach in our own organisation Reader Information Document Purpose Author Audience Further copies from Copyright Inspection Report CSCI General Public 0870 240 7535 (telephone order line) This report is copyright Commission for Social Care Inspection (CSCI) and may only be used in its entirety. Extracts may not be used or reproduced without the express permission of CSCI www.csci.org.uk Internet address The Crescent DS0000009012.V299014.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 2 This is a report of an inspection to assess whether services are meeting the needs of people who use them. The legal basis for conducting inspections is the Care Standards Act 2000 and the relevant National Minimum Standards for this establishment are those for Care Homes for Adults 18-65. They can be found at www.dh.gov.uk or obtained from The Stationery Office (TSO) PO Box 29, St Crispins, Duke Street, Norwich, NR3 1GN. Tel: 0870 600 5522. Online ordering: www.tso.co.uk/bookshop This report is a public document. Extracts may not be used or reproduced without the prior permission of the Commission for Social Care Inspection. The Crescent DS0000009012.V299014.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 3 SERVICE INFORMATION Name of service The Crescent Address 1 Island Crescent Newquay Cornwall TR7 1DZ 01637 874493 Telephone number Fax number Email address Provider Web address Name of registered provider(s)/company (if applicable) Name of registered manager (if applicable) Type of registration No. of places registered (if applicable) Mr Michael Westmore Samantha Crosswood Care Home 14 Category(ies) of Mental disorder, excluding learning disability or registration, with number dementia (14) of places The Crescent DS0000009012.V299014.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 4 SERVICE INFORMATION Conditions of registration: Date of last inspection 19th December 2005 Brief Description of the Service: The Crescent is registered as a residential care home that provides personal care and accommodation to 14 individuals who suffer from a mental illness. The Crescent is a three storey Victorian building that is situated in Newquay, overlooking the sea. The town centre is within easy walking distance, as are the bus and train stations. There is accommodation for 12 Service Users in the main house and more independent living for two in the annexe flat, which is attached to the main building. The property is a former hotel situated in close proximity to Newquay town centre. There is no designated car park and parking on the road may be particularly difficult in the summer months. The location offers service users easy access to local amenities and shops. Newquay has its own cottage hospital that acts as an outpatient centre for all aspects of medical care, including mental health care. The Crescent DS0000009012.V299014.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 5 SUMMARY This is an overview of what the inspector found during the inspection. This was a key unannounced inspection to monitor the care standards at the home. The inspection began at 10am and was completed at 4pm. The Inspector had the opportunity to speak with service users, staff, inspect records and case tracking of 2 service users and tour the premises. A telephone conversation also occurred with a community psychiatric nurse based at Newquay Hospital regarding services at the home. What the service does well: What has improved since the last inspection? What they could do better: Please contact the provider for advice of actions taken in response to this inspection. The report of this inspection is available from enquiries@csci.gsi.gov.uk or by contacting your local CSCI office. The Crescent DS0000009012.V299014.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 6 DETAILS OF INSPECTOR FINDINGS CONTENTS Choice of Home (Standards 1–5) Individual Needs and Choices (Standards 6-10) Lifestyle (Standards 11-17) Personal and Healthcare Support (Standards 18-21) Concerns, Complaints and Protection (Standards 22-23) Environment (Standards 24-30) Staffing (Standards 31-36) Conduct and Management of the Home (Standards 37 – 43) Scoring of Outcomes Statutory Requirements Identified During the Inspection The Crescent DS0000009012.V299014.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 7 Choice of Home The intended outcomes for Standards 1 – 5 are: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Prospective service users have the information they need to make an informed choice about where to live. Prospective users’ individual aspirations and needs are assessed. Prospective service users know that the home that they will choose will meet their needs and aspirations. Prospective service users have an opportunity to visit and to “test drive” the home. Each service user has an individual written contract or statement of terms and conditions with the home. The Commission consider Standard 2 the key standard to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): 1, 2 and 4. The quality in this outcome group of standards is adequate. This judgement has been made from evidence gathered before this inspection and inspecting the assessment and admission procedure for a recent admission to the home. EVIDENCE: The registered manager was available to discuss the admission process for a service user recently admitted to the home. Detailed referral forms are completed prior to each admission to the home to form a Core Assessment. The Inspector observed comprehensive pre assessment information gathered for the new admission that included contributions from appropriate services. A gradual introduction to the home is planned for any new service user including a full assessment, introduction to other service users living at the home and meeting the staff. The registered manager stated that the majority of service users had lived at the home for 10 years or more, enjoying a stable living environment. The registered manager is advised to ensure that all service users have been provided with a guide to the home and that this is noted in their records. The Crescent DS0000009012.V299014.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 8 Individual Needs and Choices The intended outcomes for Standards 6 – 10 are: 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Service users know their assessed and changing needs and personal goals are reflected in their individual Plan. Service users make decisions about their lives with assistance as needed. Service users are consulted on, and participate in, all aspects of life in the home. Service users are supported to take risks as part of an independent lifestyle. Service users know that information about them is handled appropriately, and that their confidences are kept. The Commission considers Standards 6, 7 and 9 the key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): 6, 7 and 9. The quality in this outcome group of standards is adequate. This judgement has been made from evidence gathered before this inspection and the case tracking of records for 2 service users. EVIDENCE: The records of 2 service users were inspected and showed appropriate information is organised to provide for the welfare of service users. The service user plans are based upon the assessment record and developed in conjunction with the service users who sign them. Care Plans are completed and any potential restrictions on choice are discussed and agreed with the service user. The plan covers various aspects of social, physical and psychological care. The records demonstrated that the home was monitoring closely the needs of service users and that risk assessments and reviews with other agencies had occurred to protect service users at the home. The registered manager stated that multidisciplinary reviews are not occurring on a regular basis for service users that have lived at the home for many years in a stable condition. There is no Key worker system within the home and service users generally approach the staff member that they choose. The Crescent DS0000009012.V299014.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 9 Lifestyle The intended outcomes for Standards 11 - 17 are: 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. Service users have opportunities for personal development. Service users are able to take part in age, peer and culturally appropriate activities. Service users are part of the local community. Service users engage in appropriate leisure activities. Service users have appropriate personal, family and sexual relationships. Service users’ rights are respected and responsibilities recognised in their daily lives. Service users are offered a healthy diet and enjoy their meals and mealtimes. The Commission considers Standards 12, 13, 15, 16 and 17 the key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): 12, 13, 15, 16 and 17. The quality in this outcome group of standards is good. This judgement has been made from evidence gathered before this inspection and discussion with the registered manager, service users and records inspected. EVIDENCE: The registered manager stated that the home is actively supporting service users to maintain their interest in a choice of activities. Service users receive various levels of support to identify practical or social life skills that they wish to develop and participate in the preparation of food, washing up and tidying their rooms. The location of the home in the centre of Newquay facilitates integration into the local community and service users are encouraged to maximise their independence and continue with existing interests and hobbies. Service users are encouraged to participate in college courses, Church services, attend the library, exercise groups and information about community activities are made available to the service users. The Service Users value their freedom of choice and stated they are able to make choices about how they spend their time; all Service Users have a key to their room and the front door. The Crescent DS0000009012.V299014.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 10 Personal and Healthcare Support The intended outcomes for Standards 18 - 21 are: 18. 19. 20. 21. Service users receive personal support in the way they prefer and require. Service users’ physical and emotional health needs are met. Service users retain, administer and control their own medication where appropriate, and are protected by the home’s policies and procedures for dealing with medicines. The ageing, illness and death of a service user are handled with respect and as the individual would wish. The Commission considers Standards 18, 19, and 20 the key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): 18, 19 and 20. The quality in this outcome group of standards is adequate. This judgement has been made from evidence gathered before this inspection and discussion with the community staff, registered manager, service users and records inspected. EVIDENCE: All Service Users are registered with a General Practitioner from 3 local surgeries. The records evidence regular specialist input from various support services as required, such as Community Psychiatric Nurses, Social Workers, Chiropodist and Dentist. Newquay has its own cottage hospital that acts as an outpatient centre for all aspects of medical care, including mental health care. A telephone conversation with a community psychiatric nurse confirmed that the home is providing appropriate services for service users. The Crescent DS0000009012.V299014.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 11 Concerns, Complaints and Protection The intended outcomes for Standards 22 – 23 are: 22. 23. Service users feel their views are listened to and acted on. Service users are protected from abuse, neglect and self-harm. The Commission considers Standards 22, and 23 the key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): 22 and 23. The quality in this outcome group of standards is good. This judgement has been made from evidence gathered before this inspection and discussion with the registered manager and records inspected. EVIDENCE: The registered manager and the staff on duty have attended appropriate protection of vulnerable adults training and another 3 staff are registered to attend training in September 2006. Appropriate policy and procedures are available and included in staff induction training. Information regarding the complaints process is available to service users at the home. The home assists service users with the safe storage of valuables and the records and balances inspected were accurately maintained. Records of incidents are maintained and appropriate action has recently been initiated to protect service users following the review process. The Crescent DS0000009012.V299014.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 12 Environment The intended outcomes for Standards 24 – 30 are: 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. Service users live in a homely, comfortable and safe environment. Service users’ bedrooms suit their needs and lifestyles. Service users’ bedrooms promote their independence. Service users’ toilets and bathrooms provide sufficient privacy and meet their individual needs. Shared spaces complement and supplement service users’ individual rooms. Service users have the specialist equipment they require to maximise their independence. The home is clean and hygienic. The Commission considers Standards 24, and 30 the key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): 24, 27, 28 and 30. The quality in this outcome group of standards is adequate. This judgement has been made from evidence gathered before this inspection and a tour of the premises. EVIDENCE: There is a large smoking lounge on the first floor with a television and a dining room with lounge area on the ground floor with another television. The bathrooms at the home have been refurbished recently and the registered manager stated that an improvement to some bedrooms would be beneficial. The registered persons should review environmental standards within the home and establish an improvement plan with timescales regarding the replacement of hallway carpets and redecoration of bedrooms. The service users are physically ambulant and the home does not provide a passenger lift or specialist equipment. All Service Users have a single room and these rooms are personalised. Service Users stated approval of their accommodation and the privacy that it gives them. All individuals have a front door and bedroom key. The registered manager assisted me in a tour of the premises and concerns were raised regarding the storage of paint near a fire exit. A requirement is made for the registered manager to consult with the fire authority regarding a fire door that did not close appropriately and was also missing a handle. The Crescent DS0000009012.V299014.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 13 Staffing The intended outcomes for Standards 31 – 36 are: 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. Service users benefit from clarity of staff roles and responsibilities. Service users are supported by competent and qualified staff. Service users are supported by an effective staff team. Service users are supported and protected by the home’s recruitment policy and practices. Service users’ individual and joint needs are met by appropriately trained staff. Service users benefit from well supported and supervised staff. The Commission considers Standards 32, 34 and 35 the key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): 32, 33, 34, 35 and 36. The quality in this outcome group of standards is adequate. This judgement has been made from evidence gathered before this inspection, discussion with staff and a review of records. EVIDENCE: The current rota shows that there are two members of staff on duty for most of the day and a sleeping night support worker is provided. There were 2 members of staff on duty on the day of the unannounced inspection. The staff undertake generic roles with no designated laundry, domestic, maintenance or catering staff. The support staff exhibited appropriate skills and attitudes in their interactions with service users. The support staff have completed appropriate NVQ training opportunities at various levels, first aid, food and hygiene and protection training. The records regarding staff recruitment and supervision meetings are appropriately maintained. The Crescent DS0000009012.V299014.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 14 Conduct and Management of the Home The intended outcomes for Standards 37 – 43 are: 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. Service users benefit from a well run home. Service users benefit from the ethos, leadership and management approach of the home. Service users are confident their views underpin all self-monitoring, review and development by the home. Service users’ rights and best interests are safeguarded by the home’s policies and procedures. Service users’ rights and best interests are safeguarded by the home’s record keeping policies and procedures. The health, safety and welfare of service users are promoted and protected. Service users benefit from competent and accountable management of the service. The Commission considers Standards 37, 39, and 42 the key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): 37, 39, 42. The quality in this outcome group of standards is adequate. This judgement has been made from evidence gathered before this inspection, the registration process, discussion with staff and a review of records. EVIDENCE: The registered provider has many years experience of managing The Crescent on a daily basis but is now living out of the area. A registered manager has been approved to take day-to-day control of the home. The registered manager has achieved a National Vocational Qualification Level 4 in Care and plans to complete the Registered Manager’s Award in November 2006. The registered provider is completing Regulation 26 visits to the home to monitor care standards and reports are available to the Commission for Social Care Inspection. A discussion occurred with the registered manager regarding quality assurance procedures and a recommendation is made to develop the surveys used to include service users and others involved in supporting service users. The fire precautions have been improved by the introduction of smoke detectors and electrical wiring checks have occurred recently. The registered The Crescent DS0000009012.V299014.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 15 manager agreed to supply a copy of invoices to confirm the completion of the 5-year wiring check and other electrical work at the home. Risk assessments have been undertaken for all service users in relation to the unregulated hot water supply and radiator hot surfaces that are uncovered. Appropriate staff training and instruction in fire precautions occur and support staff complete safety checks. The Crescent DS0000009012.V299014.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 16 SCORING OF OUTCOMES This page summarises the assessment of the extent to which the National Minimum Standards for Care Homes for Adults 18-65 have been met and uses the following scale. The scale ranges from: 4 Standard Exceeded 2 Standard Almost Met (Commendable) (Minor Shortfalls) 3 Standard Met 1 Standard Not Met (No Shortfalls) (Major Shortfalls) “X” in the standard met box denotes standard not assessed on this occasion “N/A” in the standard met box denotes standard not applicable CHOICE OF HOME Standard No Score 1 3 2 3 3 X 4 3 5 x INDIVIDUAL NEEDS AND CHOICES Standard No 6 7 8 9 10 Score CONCERNS AND COMPLAINTS Standard No Score 22 3 23 3 ENVIRONMENT Standard No Score 24 2 25 X 26 X 27 3 28 3 29 X 30 3 STAFFING Standard No Score 31 X 32 3 33 3 34 3 35 3 36 3 CONDUCT AND MANAGEMENT OF THE HOME Standard No 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 Score 3 3 X 3 X LIFESTYLES Standard No Score 11 X 12 3 13 3 14 X 15 3 16 3 17 3 PERSONAL AND HEALTHCARE SUPPORT Standard No 18 19 20 21 Score 3 3 3 x 3 X 2 X X 2 x The Crescent DS0000009012.V299014.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 17 No Are there any outstanding requirements from the last inspection? STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS This section sets out the actions, which must be taken so that the registered person/s meets the Care Standards Act 2000, Care Homes Regulations 2001 and the National Minimum Standards. The Registered Provider(s) must comply with the given timescales. No. 1. Standard YA24 Regulation 23 Requirement The home’s premises must be suitable for its stated purpose; accessible, safe and well maintained; the registered manager must consult with the fire authority regarding an identified fire door and arrange any repairs that may be necessary to maintain effective fire precautions. Timescale for action 31/08/06 RECOMMENDATIONS These recommendations relate to National Minimum Standards and are seen as good practice for the Registered Provider/s to consider carrying out. No. 1. Refer to Standard YA24 Good Practice Recommendations The registered persons should review environmental standards within the home and establish an improvement plan with timescales regarding the replacement of hallway carpets and redecoration of bedrooms. The Registered Provider should review the quality assurance tools to provide more focused questions and to widen the scope to other agencies as well as service users. The Registered Provider should make arrangements for the DS0000009012.V299014.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 18 2. YA39 The Crescent publication of a summary of the findings, including any action taken in response to these. This must be made available to the Service Users and a copy supplied to the Commission for Social Care Inspection. 3. YA42 The registered manager should supply a copy of invoices or other evidence to confirm the completion of the 5-year wiring check and other electrical work at the home. The Crescent DS0000009012.V299014.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 19 Commission for Social Care Inspection St Austell Office John Keay House Tregonissey Road St Austell Cornwall PL25 4AD National Enquiry Line: 0845 015 0120 Email: enquiries@csci.gsi.gov.uk Web: www.csci.org.uk © This report is copyright Commission for Social Care Inspection (CSCI) and may only be used in its entirety. Extracts may not be used or reproduced without the express permission of CSCI The Crescent DS0000009012.V299014.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 20 - Please note that this information is included on www.bestcarehome.co.uk under license from the regulator. Re-publishing this information is in breach of the terms of use of that website. Discrete codes and changes have been inserted throughout the textual data shown on the site that will provide incontrovertable proof of copying in the event this information is re-published on other websites. The policy of www.bestcarehome.co.uk is to use all legal avenues to pursue such offenders, including recovery of costs. You have been warned!