Please wait

Please note that the information on this website is now out of date. It is planned that we will update and relaunch, but for now is of historical interest only and we suggest you visit cqc.org.uk

Inspection on 14/11/06 for April Cottage

Also see our care home review for April Cottage for more information

This inspection was carried out on 14th November 2006.

CSCI has not published a star rating for this report, though using similar criteria we estimate that the report is Adequate. The way we rate inspection reports is consistent for all houses, though please be aware that this may be different from an official CSCI judgement.

The inspector found no outstanding requirements from the previous inspection report, but made 3 statutory requirements (actions the home must comply with) as a result of this inspection.

What follows are excerpts from this inspection report. For more information read the full report on the next tab.

What the care home does well

Guests say they have a good time when they visit the home and relatives say that staff are very good. The home continued to have a friendly, relaxed atmosphere with positive relationships between guests and staff. Staff had a good understanding of residents` support needs. The home would be able to meet the needs of individuals of various religious, racial or cultural backgrounds. Meals provided are good. Personal care and healthcare support provided in this home is good. Staff say morale is good.

What has improved since the last inspection?

New staff have been recruited or transferred to the home, therefore the home uses less agency staff.

What the care home could do better:

The home would benefit from redecoration and new kitchen cupboards to make it a more pleasant environment. The manager needs to get advice about how to safely dispose of clinical or incontinence waste to make sure that the home is safe and hygienic. The organisation needs to make sure that it regularly checks that guests are happy and the home is being well run.

CARE HOME ADULTS 18-65 April Cottage Ducklington Lane Witney Oxfordshire OX28 4TJ Lead Inspector Catherine Kane Unannounced Inspection 14th November 2006 05:00 April Cottage DS0000013061.V320213.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 1 The Commission for Social Care Inspection aims to: • • • • Put the people who use social care first Improve services and stamp out bad practice Be an expert voice on social care Practise what we preach in our own organisation Reader Information Document Purpose Author Audience Further copies from Copyright Inspection Report CSCI General Public 0870 240 7535 (telephone order line) This report is copyright Commission for Social Care Inspection (CSCI) and may only be used in its entirety. Extracts may not be used or reproduced without the express permission of CSCI www.csci.org.uk Internet address April Cottage DS0000013061.V320213.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 2 This is a report of an inspection to assess whether services are meeting the needs of people who use them. The legal basis for conducting inspections is the Care Standards Act 2000 and the relevant National Minimum Standards for this establishment are those for Care Homes for Adults 18-65. They can be found at www.dh.gov.uk or obtained from The Stationery Office (TSO) PO Box 29, St Crispins, Duke Street, Norwich, NR3 1GN. Tel: 0870 600 5522. Online ordering: www.tso.co.uk/bookshop This report is a public document. Extracts may not be used or reproduced without the prior permission of the Commission for Social Care Inspection. April Cottage DS0000013061.V320213.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 3 SERVICE INFORMATION Name of service April Cottage Address Ducklington Lane Witney Oxfordshire OX28 4TJ 01993 773832 Telephone number Fax number Email address Provider Web address Name of registered provider(s)/company (if applicable) Name of registered manager (if applicable) Type of registration No. of places registered (if applicable) aprilcottage@oldt.nhs.uk Oxfordshire Learning Disability NHS Trust Ms Lynn Davison Care Home 4 Category(ies) of Learning disability (4), Physical disability (4) registration, with number of places April Cottage DS0000013061.V320213.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 4 SERVICE INFORMATION Conditions of registration: 1. 2. The total number of persons that may be accommodated at any one time must not exceed 4 Admittance of one named out of category resident effective from 5th April 2006 13th December 2005 Date of last inspection Brief Description of the Service: April Cottage is a purpose built four bedroomed bungalow situated at the end of a private drive about a mile from Witney town centre. It provides a short-term break/respite service for up to four people with learning and physical disabilities who live with their families in the local area. The bungalow has ramps and adaptations and is fully accessible for people who use wheelchairs. The home is run and managed by the Oxfordshire Learning Disability NHS Trust and is accessed only through referrals from local authority care management. The guest contributes from £49.65 to £90.65 per week. April Cottage DS0000013061.V320213.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 5 SUMMARY This is an overview of what the inspector found during the inspection. The Commission has, since the 1st April 2006, developed the way it undertakes its inspection of care services. This inspection of the service was an unannounced ‘Key Inspection’. The inspector arrived at the service at 5pm on Tuesday, 14 November 2006. She returned on Wednesday, 15 November 2006. The inspector was in the service for a total of four and a half hours. The inspection was a thorough look at how well the service is doing. It took into account detailed information provided by the service’s owner or manager, and any information that the CSCI has received about the service since the last inspection. The inspector asked the views of the people who use the service and other people seen during the inspection or who responded to questionnaires that the Commission had sent out. The inspector looked at how well the service was meeting the standards set by the government and has, in this report, made judgements about the standard of the service. She spoke with two members of staff who were on duty on the first day of the inspection. She met with the registered manager the following day. The inspector saw some guests having their evening meal and saw how staff help residents look after and take their medicines. She also looked at residents’ care plans and other records kept in the home and made a tour of part of the premises. The inspector would like to thank the manager and her staff team for their assistance with the inspection. She also thanks residents and all others who shared their experience of this home. What the service does well: What has improved since the last inspection? New staff have been recruited or transferred to the home, therefore the home uses less agency staff. April Cottage DS0000013061.V320213.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 6 What they could do better: Please contact the provider for advice of actions taken in response to this inspection. The report of this inspection is available from enquiries@csci.gsi.gov.uk or by contacting your local CSCI office. The summary of this inspection report can be made available in other formats on request. April Cottage DS0000013061.V320213.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 7 DETAILS OF INSPECTOR FINDINGS CONTENTS Choice of Home (Standards 1–5) Individual Needs and Choices (Standards 6-10) Lifestyle (Standards 11-17) Personal and Healthcare Support (Standards 18-21) Concerns, Complaints and Protection (Standards 22-23) Environment (Standards 24-30) Staffing (Standards 31-36) Conduct and Management of the Home (Standards 37 – 43) Scoring of Outcomes Statutory Requirements Identified During the Inspection April Cottage DS0000013061.V320213.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 8 Choice of Home The intended outcomes for Standards 1 – 5 are: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Prospective service users have the information they need to make an informed choice about where to live. Prospective users’ individual aspirations and needs are assessed. Prospective service users know that the home that they will choose will meet their needs and aspirations. Prospective service users have an opportunity to visit and to “test drive” the home. Each service user has an individual written contract or statement of terms and conditions with the home. The Commission consider Standard 2 the key standard to be inspected. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): 2 Quality in this outcome area is good. This judgement has been made using available evidence including a visit to this service. The admission procedure is good. EVIDENCE: There have been ten new guests who have started using the home since the last inspection. The pre-admission assessment records were sampled at random for three new guests and these included a full care needs assessment. Generally admissions are not made to the home until a full needs assessment has been undertaken. The home is then able to confirm that it can meet the needs of the individual through the service it delivers, as detailed in the statement of purpose. Evidence confirms that the assessment is conducted professionally and sensitively and has involved the family or representative of the person who uses the service. Prospective new guests are given the opportunity to spend time in the home. April Cottage DS0000013061.V320213.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 9 Individual Needs and Choices The intended outcomes for Standards 6 – 10 are: 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Service users know their assessed and changing needs and personal goals are reflected in their individual Plan. Service users make decisions about their lives with assistance as needed. Service users are consulted on, and participate in, all aspects of life in the home. Service users are supported to take risks as part of an independent lifestyle. Service users know that information about them is handled appropriately, and that their confidences are kept. The Commission considers Standards 6, 7 and 9 the key standards to be inspected. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): 6, 7 and 9. Quality in this outcome area is good. This judgement has been made using available evidence including a visit to this service. The care planning system in place to provide staff with the information they need and for assessing risk is good. EVIDENCE: During the inspection the inspector viewed four person-centred care plans. These were easy to understand, written in plain language and considered all areas of the individual’s life including health, personal and social care needs. The plan is regularly reviewed and includes comprehensive risk assessments. From the evidence seen by the inspector and comments received, the inspector considers that this service would be able to provide a service to meet the needs of individuals of various religious, racial or cultural backgrounds. April Cottage DS0000013061.V320213.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 10 Lifestyle The intended outcomes for Standards 11 - 17 are: 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. Service users have opportunities for personal development. Service users are able to take part in age, peer and culturally appropriate activities. Service users are part of the local community. Service users engage in appropriate leisure activities. Service users have appropriate personal, family and sexual relationships. Service users’ rights are respected and responsibilities recognised in their daily lives. Service users are offered a healthy diet and enjoy their meals and mealtimes. The Commission considers Standards 12, 13, 15, 16 and 17 the key standards to be inspected. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): 12, 13, 15, 16 and 17 Quality in this outcome area is excellent. This judgement has been made using available evidence including a visit to this service. Opportunities for people who use this service to take part in a variety of interesting activities is excellent. EVIDENCE: On the first day of the inspection the inspector was in the home during the evening. She spent this time with all four guests and the staff on duty. One guest had very good communication skills, was confident and able to tell the inspector about their experiences of the home. The other three guests also had good understanding and, even though they were shy, they were all able to tell the inspector about some things that are important for them. One guest told the inspector, “I like to come to April Cottage, I come at the same time as my friend”. April Cottage DS0000013061.V320213.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 11 Many activities provided in-house were based on what guests prefer to do in their leisure time; these included listening to music, watching TV, videos, DVDs, magazines, puzzles and games, art and crafts, cooking, gardening, beauty sessions and foot and hand massage. Activities outside the home include going to the pub, shops, country walks and trips out. Guests are supported to attend any day service, college, groups or clubs that they would usually go to whilst at home with their families. One guest, helped by their mother, returned a questionnaire where they confirmed that they can do what they want at anytime when they stay at the home and that staff always treat them well. Three relatives of guests returned questionnaires or wrote to the inspector. All indicated that they are very satisfied with the care provided in the home. One relative commented, “April Cottage is a lifeline for all who go there, with friendly staff”. Another relative said, “He does enjoy his time spent there”. The inspector was in the home when the evening meal was being prepared and served. Guests and staff have their meal together in the dining room where the inspector joined in with the dinner conversation. The meal was freshly cooked sausages in gravy with mash and vegetables followed by fresh fruit and cream. One guest said, “I really enjoyed that” after they had finished their meal. Regular drinks and snacks are available. A varied menu is provided and residents’ special dietary needs are catered for. April Cottage DS0000013061.V320213.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 12 Personal and Healthcare Support The intended outcomes for Standards 18 - 21 are: 18. 19. 20. 21. Service users receive personal support in the way they prefer and require. Service users’ physical and emotional health needs are met. Service users retain, administer and control their own medication where appropriate, and are protected by the home’s policies and procedures for dealing with medicines. The ageing, illness and death of a service user are handled with respect and as the individual would wish. The Commission considers Standards 18, 19, and 20 the key standards to be inspected. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): 18, 19 and 20. Quality in this outcome area is good. This judgement has been made using available evidence including a visit to this service. The personal and healthcare needs of guests are well met. EVIDENCE: Essential information needed by staff to be able to provide personal and health care support was included in care plans. Staff help guests to look after their own medication. Guests healthcare needs are generally undertaken by their families and arrangements in the case of an emergency can be made. The home will liaise with GPs, district nurses and other healthcare professionals when necessary. Guests’ medicines are securely kept in locked medicine cabinets located in each bedroom. A supplying pharmacist had recently visited the home to advise on good practice. The home uses a standard medication administration record (MAR) which is handwritten. Records were kept of staff assessed as competent to administer medicines and these were seen during the visit. During the inspection two staff members confidently demonstrated how a resident’s medicines are looked after and how residents are helped to take their medicines. April Cottage DS0000013061.V320213.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 13 Concerns, Complaints and Protection The intended outcomes for Standards 22 – 23 are: 22. 23. Service users feel their views are listened to and acted on. Service users are protected from abuse, neglect and self-harm. The Commission considers Standards 22, and 23 the key standards to be inspected. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): 22 and 23 Quality in this outcome area is good. This judgement has been made using available evidence including a visit to this service. The home has a protection from abuse policy and the complaints procedure is good. EVIDENCE: The manager declared that the home has received one complaint in the last year. From information seen during the inspection this issue was dealt with in line with the OLDT complaints policy. The Commission has received no information relating to complaints in the last year. Staff have attended specific training on protecting vulnerable people from abuse and about local adult protection procedures in line with the Oxfordshire Multi-Agency Codes of Practice. The Commission has received no information relating to adult protection issues in the last year. April Cottage DS0000013061.V320213.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 14 Environment The intended outcomes for Standards 24 – 30 are: 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. Service users live in a homely, comfortable and safe environment. Service users’ bedrooms suit their needs and lifestyles. Service users’ bedrooms promote their independence. Service users’ toilets and bathrooms provide sufficient privacy and meet their individual needs. Shared spaces complement and supplement service users’ individual rooms. Service users have the specialist equipment they require to maximise their independence. The home is clean and hygienic. The Commission considers Standards 24, and 30 the key standards to be inspected. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): 24 and 30 Quality in this outcome area is adequate. This judgement has been made using available evidence including a visit to this service. The home was tidy and clean at the time of the inspection. EVIDENCE: The furniture and fittings are modern and domestic in style, providing a home-like environment. The comfortable lounge leads to a well maintained garden and patio area. The kitchen cupboards are old and worn with some cupboard doors unhinged. The plasterwork in the hallway had a large crack and the paintwork in most areas of the home, including bedrooms and the bathroom, was damaged and in need of redecoration. April Cottage DS0000013061.V320213.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 15 During the inspection the inspector was informed that the clinical or incontinence waste disposal service used by the home has been stopped. The manager must consult, without delay, the appropriate environmental health and/or public health authority and take the necessary action upon the advice given. April Cottage DS0000013061.V320213.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 16 Staffing The intended outcomes for Standards 31 – 36 are: 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. Service users benefit from clarity of staff roles and responsibilities. Service users are supported by competent and qualified staff. Service users are supported by an effective staff team. Service users are supported and protected by the home’s recruitment policy and practices. Service users’ individual and joint needs are met by appropriately trained staff. Service users benefit from well supported and supervised staff. The Commission considers Standards 32, 34 and 35 the key standards to be inspected. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): 32, 34 and 35. Quality in this outcome area is good. This judgement has been made using available evidence including a visit to this service. At the time of inspection staffing levels appeared to be appropriate for the needs of the current resident group to be met. The systems in place for recruitment of new staff demonstrate a systematic and thorough screening and interview process. EVIDENCE: During the inspection the inspector spoke with two members of staff on duty. The home has a core of well-established staff who understand guests’ needs and they relate well to. From the shift rota seen there has been some moderate use of agency staff in this home in recent months but this has improved with the recruitment of new staff. Two staff have left and three new staff have been recruited or transferred from other services since the last inspection. Staff commented that morale is good. The inspector visited the HR department at the head office on Thurday, 22 June 2006 as part of the inspection of another service run and managed by this organisation. Files seen were well maintained. April Cottage DS0000013061.V320213.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 17 The recruitment process is thorough. The home keeps a record of training completed by staff; staff spoken with confirmed details of the training they have undertaken. However, only two staff members have completed a relevant National Vocational Qualification (NVQ). The home has not met national targets to have 50 of staff qualified. The home has recently had access to an external NVQ assessor and the manager is optimistic that this will assist the home towards meeting the 50 target. April Cottage DS0000013061.V320213.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 18 Conduct and Management of the Home The intended outcomes for Standards 37 – 43 are: 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. Service users benefit from a well run home. Service users benefit from the ethos, leadership and management approach of the home. Service users are confident their views underpin all self-monitoring, review and development by the home. Service users’ rights and best interests are safeguarded by the home’s policies and procedures. Service users’ rights and best interests are safeguarded by the home’s record keeping policies and procedures. The health, safety and welfare of service users are promoted and protected. Service users benefit from competent and accountable management of the service. The Commission considers Standards 37, 39, and 42 the key standards to be inspected. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): 37, 39 and 42 Quality in this outcome area is good. This judgement has been made using available evidence including a visit to this service. The registered manager has a good understanding of management areas in which the home needs to improve and has plans in place to address this. EVIDENCE: It is expected that the registered manager shall undertake further training qualifications at Level 4 NVQ in both Management and Care. Therefore, this standard is rated as ‘standard almost met’, scored 2. The registered manager is currently undertaking the Registered Managers Award. April Cottage DS0000013061.V320213.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 19 The registered manager is competent to run the home and meet its stated aims and objectives. The manager has sound knowledge and experience in the care of people with a learning disability, quality assurance systems, equal opportunity issues, development and implementation of the service policies and procedures, good people skills, strong leadership of staff which leads to confident workers, responds to need and provides an excellent role model and manages the service efficiently. She has a strong ethos of being open and transparent in all areas of running of the home and is aware of current developments, both nationally and by CSCI and plans the service accordingly. A monitoring audit of the services provided in this home completed by the local authority has taken place but this was not available at the time of the inspection. The manager completes a monthly quality monitoring checklist. However, there have been only five proprietor’s representative monthly visit reports issued since the last inspection. Whilst the Commission no longer requires that a copy of this report be sent to them, a copy must be kept in the home and made available for inspection. The home has sound policies and procedures in line with current thinking and practice. Efficient systems are in place to monitor staff adherence to policies and procedures during their practice. The home works to a clear health and safety policy and checks take place to ensure that the home meets relevant health and safety requirements and legislation. Records kept were generally adequate and are routinely completed. Where issues have been identified, these have been acted upon successfully to ensure residents’ care is not compromised. Oxfordshire Learning Disability NHS Trust, operating as Ridgeway Partnership, who runs this service, has financial and accounting systems subject to internal and external audits. The organisation was rated as a high level performer in the Healthcare Commission 2006 report. April Cottage DS0000013061.V320213.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 20 SCORING OF OUTCOMES This page summarises the assessment of the extent to which the National Minimum Standards for Care Homes for Adults 18-65 have been met and uses the following scale. The scale ranges from: 4 Standard Exceeded 2 Standard Almost Met (Commendable) (Minor Shortfalls) 3 Standard Met 1 Standard Not Met (No Shortfalls) (Major Shortfalls) “X” in the standard met box denotes standard not assessed on this occasion “N/A” in the standard met box denotes standard not applicable CHOICE OF HOME Standard No Score 1 X 2 3 3 X 4 X 5 X INDIVIDUAL NEEDS AND CHOICES Standard No 6 7 8 9 10 Score CONCERNS AND COMPLAINTS Standard No Score 22 3 23 3 ENVIRONMENT Standard No Score 24 2 25 X 26 X 27 X 28 X 29 X 30 2 STAFFING Standard No Score 31 X 32 3 33 X 34 3 35 3 36 X CONDUCT AND MANAGEMENT OF THE HOME Standard No 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 Score 3 3 X 3 X LIFESTYLES Standard No Score 11 X 12 4 13 3 14 X 15 4 16 3 17 3 PERSONAL AND HEALTHCARE SUPPORT Standard No 18 19 20 21 Score 3 3 3 X 2 X 2 X X 3 X April Cottage DS0000013061.V320213.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 21 No Are there any outstanding requirements from the last inspection? STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS This section sets out the actions, which must be taken so that the registered person/s meets the Care Standards Act 2000, Care Homes Regulations 2001 and the National Minimum Standards. The Registered Provider(s) must comply with the given timescales. No. 1 Standard YA24 Regulation 23(2) Requirement The responsible person must provide details of the renewal, maintenance and repair programme for the home, internally and externally. The responsible person must provide details of the outcome of their consultation with the appropriate environmental health and/or public health authority about the needs of the home in relation to clinical or incontinence waste disposal and take the necessary action. The responsible person must ensure that they, or their representative, completes a monthly unannounced visit to the home and a copy of the report is kept in the home and is made available for inspection. Timescale for action 31/12/06 2 YA30 16(2)(j) 31/12/06 3 YA39 26 30/11/06 April Cottage DS0000013061.V320213.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 22 RECOMMENDATIONS These recommendations relate to National Minimum Standards and are seen as good practice for the Registered Provider/s to consider carrying out. No. Refer to Standard Good Practice Recommendations April Cottage DS0000013061.V320213.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 23 Commission for Social Care Inspection Oxford Office Burgner House 4630 Kingsgate Oxford Business Park South Cowley, Oxford OX4 2SU National Enquiry Line: Telephone: 0845 015 0120 or 0191 233 3323 Textphone: 0845 015 2255 or 0191 233 3588 Email: enquiries@csci.gsi.gov.uk Web: www.csci.org.uk © This report is copyright Commission for Social Care Inspection (CSCI) and may only be used in its entirety. Extracts may not be used or reproduced without the express permission of CSCI April Cottage DS0000013061.V320213.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 24 - Please note that this information is included on www.bestcarehome.co.uk under license from the regulator. Re-publishing this information is in breach of the terms of use of that website. Discrete codes and changes have been inserted throughout the textual data shown on the site that will provide incontrovertable proof of copying in the event this information is re-published on other websites. The policy of www.bestcarehome.co.uk is to use all legal avenues to pursue such offenders, including recovery of costs. You have been warned!