This inspection was carried out on 30th January 2006.
CSCI has not published a star rating for this report, though using similar criteria we estimate that the report is Good. The way we rate inspection reports is consistent for all houses, though please be aware that this may be different from an official CSCI judgement.
The inspector made no statutory requirements on the home as a result of this inspection
and there were no outstanding actions from the previous inspection report.
CARE HOME ADULTS 18-65
Chilmington House Armadale Court, Westcote Road Reading Berkshire RG30 2ES Lead Inspector
Sally Newman Unannounced Inspection 30th January 2006 11:50 DS0000011123.V270817.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 1 The Commission for Social Care Inspection aims to: • • • • Put the people who use social care first Improve services and stamp out bad practice Be an expert voice on social care Practise what we preach in our own organisation Reader Information
Document Purpose Author Audience Further copies from Copyright Inspection Report CSCI General Public 0870 240 7535 (telephone order line) This report is copyright Commission for Social Care Inspection (CSCI) and may only be used in its entirety. Extracts may not be used or reproduced without the express permission of CSCI www.csci.org.uk Internet address DS0000011123.V270817.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 2 This is a report of an inspection to assess whether services are meeting the needs of people who use them. The legal basis for conducting inspections is the Care Standards Act 2000 and the relevant National Minimum Standards for this establishment are those for Care Homes for Adults 18-65. They can be found at www.dh.gov.uk or obtained from The Stationery Office (TSO) PO Box 29, St Crispins, Duke Street, Norwich, NR3 1GN. Tel: 0870 600 5522. Online ordering: www.tso.co.uk/bookshop This report is a public document. Extracts may not be used or reproduced without the prior permission of the Commission for Social Care Inspection. DS0000011123.V270817.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 3 SERVICE INFORMATION
Name of service Chilmington House Address Armadale Court, Westcote Road Reading Berkshire RG30 2ES 0118 956 7877 Telephone number Fax number Email address Provider Web address Name of registered provider(s)/company (if applicable) Name of registered manager (if applicable) Type of registration No. of places registered (if applicable) chilmington@yahoo.co.uk Mrs Brenda Dean Ms Martine Patricia Lesley Dell Care Home 7 Category(ies) of Learning disability (7) registration, with number of places DS0000011123.V270817.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 4 SERVICE INFORMATION
Conditions of registration: Date of last inspection 29th July 2005 Brief Description of the Service: Chilmington House is a purpose built building which provides seven bedrooms for people with a learning disability and with associated physical disabilities. The home has a lounge, dining room kitchen and laundry room. There is also a garden area with seating and a barbecue. All seven bedrooms have been decorated to reflect the individual tastes of the service users and the home in general has been furnished with service users needs at the forefront of thinking. . DS0000011123.V270817.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 5 SUMMARY
This is an overview of what the inspector found during the inspection. This was a routine unannounced inspection which was conducted over a 3 hour period over a later morning and early afternoon. Time was spent talking to the manager and staff on duty were spoken to briefly. The focus of the inspection was to evaluate standards not addressed at the last inspection. The manager assisted with this process and all standards were found to be met with one standard relating to health and safety as exceeded. What the service does well: What has improved since the last inspection? What they could do better:
This home needs to maintain the high quality of care provided and continue to strive for improvement.
DS0000011123.V270817.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 6 Please contact the provider for advice of actions taken in response to this inspection. The report of this inspection is available from enquiries@csci.gsi.gov.uk or by contacting your local CSCI office. DS0000011123.V270817.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 7 DETAILS OF INSPECTOR FINDINGS CONTENTS
Choice of Home (Standards 1–5) Individual Needs and Choices (Standards 6-10) Lifestyle (Standards 11-17) Personal and Healthcare Support (Standards 18-21) Concerns, Complaints and Protection (Standards 22-23) Environment (Standards 24-30) Staffing (Standards 31-36) Conduct and Management of the Home (Standards 37 – 43) Scoring of Outcomes Statutory Requirements Identified During the Inspection DS0000011123.V270817.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 8 Choice of Home
The intended outcomes for Standards 1 – 5 are: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Prospective service users have the information they need to make an informed choice about where to live. Prospective users’ individual aspirations and needs are assessed. Prospective service users know that the home that they will choose will meet their needs and aspirations. Prospective service users have an opportunity to visit and to “test drive” the home. Each service user has an individual written contract or statement of terms and conditions with the home. The Commission consider Standard 2 the key standard to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): No standards under this heading were inspected on this occasion. EVIDENCE: DS0000011123.V270817.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 9 Individual Needs and Choices
The intended outcomes for Standards 6 – 10 are: 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Service users know their assessed and changing needs and personal goals are reflected in their individual Plan. Service users make decisions about their lives with assistance as needed. Service users are consulted on, and participate in, all aspects of life in the home. Service users are supported to take risks as part of an independent lifestyle. Service users know that information about them is handled appropriately, and that their confidences are kept. The Commission considers Standards 6, 7 and 9 the key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): No standards under this heading were inspected on this occasion. EVIDENCE: DS0000011123.V270817.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 10 Lifestyle
The intended outcomes for Standards 11 - 17 are: 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. Service users have opportunities for personal development. Service users are able to take part in age, peer and culturally appropriate activities. Service users are part of the local community. Service users engage in appropriate leisure activities. Service users have appropriate personal, family and sexual relationships. Service users’ rights are respected and responsibilities recognised in their daily lives. Service users are offered a healthy diet and enjoy their meals and mealtimes. The Commission considers Standards 12, 13, 15, 16 and 17 the key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): 17 Service users are offered a health diet and enjoy their meals and mealtimes. EVIDENCE: Menus are planned with individual preferences and needs at the forefront of thinking. The needs of individual service users are well understood and documented. Indirect observation of the lunchtime routine provided evidence that mealtimes are unhurried and provide a relaxed atmosphere for service users. DS0000011123.V270817.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 11 Personal and Healthcare Support
The intended outcomes for Standards 18 - 21 are: 18. 19. 20. 21. Service users receive personal support in the way they prefer and require. Service users’ physical and emotional health needs are met. Service users retain, administer and control their own medication where appropriate, and are protected by the home’s policies and procedures for dealing with medicines. The ageing, illness and death of a service user are handled with respect and as the individual would wish. The Commission considers Standards 18, 19, and 20 the key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): 20 Service users are protected by the home’s policies and procedures for dealing with medicines. EVIDENCE: The arrangements for dealing with medicines were demonstrated by the manager. A monitored dosage system is used which is supported with advice from a pharmacist who has become familiar with the home and its systems. The manager conducts regular reviews of the systems to ensure consistency and a full documented internal audit is conducted on an annual basis. Medication records include invaluable information about individual preferences regarding manner and style of administration. This information had proved to be useful during medication reviews and medical consultations. Information was also included on effects and purpose of medicines administered. DS0000011123.V270817.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 12 Concerns, Complaints and Protection
The intended outcomes for Standards 22 – 23 are: 22. 23. Service users feel their views are listened to and acted on. Service users are protected from abuse, neglect and self-harm. The Commission considers Standards 22, and 23 the key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): 22 Service users are their representatives feel their concerns are listened to and acted on. EVIDENCE: One complaint had been investigated since the last inspection. All stages had been completed in a timely fashion and the outcome had been communicated to the complainant. DS0000011123.V270817.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 13 Environment
The intended outcomes for Standards 24 – 30 are: 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. Service users live in a homely, comfortable and safe environment. Service users’ bedrooms suit their needs and lifestyles. Service users’ bedrooms promote their independence. Service users’ toilets and bathrooms provide sufficient privacy and meet their individual needs. Shared spaces complement and supplement service users’ individual rooms. Service users have the specialist equipment they require to maximise their independence. The home is clean and hygienic. The Commission considers Standards 24, and 30 the key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): 24 & 30 This home provides a homely, comfortable and safe environment. This home is clean and hygienic. EVIDENCE: The atmosphere in the home is warm and welcoming. Furnishings and décor are domestic in nature and provide a comfortable environment. Maintenance issues are addressed on a regular basis and the addition of a Handyman to the team had ensured that the home is not only well maintained but enhancing features are implemented without delay. All communal areas of the home were seen and were found to be clean and hygienic. DS0000011123.V270817.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 14 Staffing
The intended outcomes for Standards 31 – 36 are: 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. Service users benefit from clarity of staff roles and responsibilities. Service users are supported by competent and qualified staff. Service users are supported by an effective staff team. Service users are supported and protected by the home’s recruitment policy and practices. Service users’ individual and joint needs are met by appropriately trained staff. Service users benefit from well supported and supervised staff. The Commission considers Standards 32, 34 and 35 the key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): 32, 34 & 35 Service users are supported by competent and qualified staff. Service users are protected by the home’s recruitment policy and practices. The level of staff training ensures that service users receive a quality service. EVIDENCE: Evidence was provided from perusal of records and from discussions with the home Manager. There is a good mix of staff in terms of experience and qualifications. The team works well together and is supportive of individuals. A small sample of staff files were seen. All required checks are carried out and there was evidence that the practice of staff recruitment is supported by the use of tools such as recruitment checklists and interview records. Induction is provided for all new staff and records of competence are maintained. Staff training is given a high priority in this home. All staff except one have either achieved an NVQ qualification or is working towards achievement. Staff training is ongoing and records demonstrate regular updates of core training. The manager monitors the training needs of the team as a whole and maintains an annual training plan which is updated each year. DS0000011123.V270817.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 15 Conduct and Management of the Home
The intended outcomes for Standards 37 – 43 are: 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. Service users benefit from a well run home. Service users benefit from the ethos, leadership and management approach of the home. Service users are confident their views underpin all self-monitoring, review and development by the home. Service users’ rights and best interests are safeguarded by the home’s policies and procedures. Service users’ rights and best interests are safeguarded by the home’s record keeping policies and procedures. The health, safety and welfare of service users are promoted and protected. Service users benefit from competent and accountable management of the service. The Commission considers Standards 37, 39, and 42 the key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): 37, 39 & 43 Service users benefit from a well run home. Service users are confident their views underpin all self-monitoring, review and development by the home. The health, safety and welfare of service users are promoted and protected. EVIDENCE: The manager is competent and experienced and provides clear direction to staff. There was evidence that the manager is approachable and fair and is particularly skilled at developing individual skills and strengths. Examples were provided where staff have implemented initiatives on behalf of service users after taking time to determine individual preferences and interests. Two examples included planning for a holiday for a service user who had been unable to leave the home over night for some considerable time and DS0000011123.V270817.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 16 a very imaginative solution to a service users inability to wear certain clothes due to their disability. Health and safety records were seen and were found to be comprehensive, wide ranging and well documented. The home had recently received a bronze award from the Environmental Health dept for complying with health and safety law. The standards for health and safety procedures in this home remain high and exceed the minimum standard expected. DS0000011123.V270817.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 17 SCORING OF OUTCOMES
This page summarises the assessment of the extent to which the National Minimum Standards for Care Homes for Adults 18-65 have been met and uses the following scale. The scale ranges from:
4 Standard Exceeded 2 Standard Almost Met (Commendable) (Minor Shortfalls) 3 Standard Met 1 Standard Not Met (No Shortfalls) (Major Shortfalls) “X” in the standard met box denotes standard not assessed on this occasion “N/A” in the standard met box denotes standard not applicable
CHOICE OF HOME CONCERNS AND COMPLAINTS Standard No 1 2 3 4 5 Score X X X X X Standard No 22 23 Score 3 X ENVIRONMENT INDIVIDUAL NEEDS AND CHOICES Standard No 6 7 8 9 10 Score X X X X X Standard No 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
STAFFING Score 3 X X X X X 3 LIFESTYLES Standard No Score 11 X 12 X 13 X 14 X 15 X 16 X 17 Standard No 31 32 33 34 35 36 Score X 3 X 3 3 X CONDUCT AND MANAGEMENT OF THE HOME 3 PERSONAL AND HEALTHCARE SUPPORT Standard No 18 19 20 21 Score X X 3 X Standard No 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 Score 3 X 3 X X 4 X DS0000011123.V270817.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 18 no Are there any outstanding requirements from the last inspection? STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS This section sets out the actions, which must be taken so that the registered person/s meets the Care Standards Act 2000, Care Homes Regulations 2001 and the National Minimum Standards. The Registered Provider(s) must comply with the given timescales. No. Standard Regulation Requirement Timescale for action RECOMMENDATIONS These recommendations relate to National Minimum Standards and are seen as good practice for the Registered Provider/s to consider carrying out. No. Refer to Standard Good Practice Recommendations DS0000011123.V270817.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 19 Commission for Social Care Inspection Berkshire Office 2nd Floor 1015 Arlington Business Park Theale, Berks RG7 4SA National Enquiry Line: 0845 015 0120 Email: enquiries@csci.gsi.gov.uk Web: www.csci.org.uk
© This report is copyright Commission for Social Care Inspection (CSCI) and may only be used in its entirety. Extracts may not be used or reproduced without the express permission of CSCI DS0000011123.V270817.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 20 - Please note that this information is included on www.bestcarehome.co.uk under license from the regulator. Re-publishing this information is in breach of the terms of use of that website. Discrete codes and changes have been inserted throughout the textual data shown on the site that will provide incontrovertable proof of copying in the event this information is re-published on other websites. The policy of www.bestcarehome.co.uk is to use all legal avenues to pursue such offenders, including recovery of costs. You have been warned!