Please note that the information on this website is now out of date. It is planned that we will update and relaunch, but for now is of historical interest only and we suggest you visit cqc.org.uk
Inspection on 17/11/09 for Oak House
Also see our care home review for Oak House for more information
This inspection was carried out on 17th November 2009.
CQC found this care home to be providing an Poor service.
The inspector made no statutory requirements on the home as a result of this inspection and there were no outstanding actions from the previous inspection report.
Other inspections for this house
Similar services:
What follows are excerpts from this inspection report. For more information read the full report on the next tab.
What the care home does well
The home has improved the quality of care provided to residents of the home since the last inspection. Observation of practise confirmed that care was being provided in a discreet and sensitive manner which respected residents right to dignity, privacy, independence and choice. All residents have an up to date and detailed care plan which is underpinned by effective risk assessment and risk management guidelines. The care plans for six people were examined and were found to be comprehensive and detailed. They contained sufficient information to enable staff to meet peoples needs effectively. Both computer held records and paper documents were up to date and accurate and contained sufficient information for staff to be able to provide the appropriate level of care. The risk assessments were accurately documented and mechanisms and guidelines were in place to reduce the risk identified. Staff commented that the `Saturn` computer system had become more reliable since it had been overhauled and they had more confidence in using the system. They commented that `it breaks down less often which has reduced the stress` and that they felt that the care plans were `well written and accurate`. The provision of the midday meal was observed on all three floors as part of this inspection. The atmosphere during lunch was relaxed and unhurried on each unit. Residents confirmed that the food was to their liking and was tasty and nutritious. From observation of practise it was evident that residents were being supported to eat their meals discreetly by seated staff. Gentle and appropriate persuasion and assistance were offered to those residents that required supervision and support. At the last key inspection in August there were shortfalls identified in relation to the quality and content of the pre admission assessments carried out by staff of the home. Subsequently several individuals who had been subject to safeguarding adult protocols were moved to other establishments which could more effectively meet their need. As a result of these shortfalls a requirement was made that assessments should be fully completed by competent and qualified individuals. Although it was identified during thissite visit that there have been no new admissions to the home since the last key inspection, examination of documentation relating to those people who had been admitted to hospital and then readmitted to the home, indicated, that each resident had been fully reassessed prior to their return. The home had been mindful to ensure that residents met the admission criteria for the home and were only admitted when the home had sufficient information about the residents needs and was satisfied that the home could meet those needs effectively. Information in the pre admission documentation had been gathered from a variety of sources including the prospective resident, their relatives, advocates and relevant health and social care professionals. The pre admission assessment was thorough and holistic and included information about the residents health and personal care needs along with information about the residents dietary needs, communication needs, mobility needs, history of falls, continence, medication regime and mental state. All the information had been collated and a new care plan developed. There have been a large number of complaints made about the quality of care provided by the home and a number of referrals have been been made and investigated under joint adult protection protocols. A requirement of the last key inspection was for staff to understand how to protect adults from abuse and to understand what constitutes neglect, abuse and exploitation. In response to this requirement the home has provided staff with additional training. Examination of the training matrix indicates that 56 staff have received safeguarding training since February 2009 and 43 staff have received training in customer care. 49 staff have received training in equality and diversity. The home has plans to ensure that all staff have further refresher training which includes training in the Mental Capacity Act and Deprivation of Liberty. The home is now checking that staff have understood what they have learnt during their training using on line questioning and certification. Staff spoken with had a good understanding and awareness of what constitutes abuse and understood their need to whistle blow if they observe poor practise. Staff seemed well motivated and said that they had enjoyed participating in training sessions. They appeared enthusiastic about their work role and were keen to provide quality care. Staff have also received refresher training in manual handling, safeguarding and customer care. Additional training opportunities are on offer to aid their knowledge and skills and improve care practise. Staff have been provided with one to one supervision sessions to enhance communication and to develop staff in their work role and to help management to monitor performance. Since the last key inspection there have been a number of changes in management of the home to aid continuity for residents and staff and to improve the homes overall performance. In the last week, the Registered Manager Wendy Marsh has returned to the home after a period of sick leave. She is being supported in her daily management tasks by the Operations Manager and Regional Director from Care UK who are based at the home along with a team of Senior Managers from other Care UK establishments that are working alongside staff in a hands on capacity. There is recognition that the home has lacked effective communication and management monitoring systems and since the last inspection new systems have been put in place to generally improve the outcome for service users. Meetings are held with hotel services, catering and nursing staff on a weekly basis. A programme of supervision and performance monitoring has been developed for staff. Meetings with residents and relatives are regularly convened to exchange information and to gain quality assurance feedback. Deficits in the quality of service provision are being dealt with daily as they are bought to managements attention.The home is currently in the process of recruiting to its many vacant posts including a Clinical Lead for the home and various Unit Managers, nurses and care staff. This will aid continuity for residents and reduce the homes dependency on agency workers. The home is being monitored on a daily
What the care home could do better:
The training opportunities for staff should continue. All staff including ancillary staff should receive customer care and safeguarding adult procedures training to enhance their knowledge and skills.