Inspection on 22/06/10 for Allan Court
Also see our care home review for Allan Court for more information
This is the latest available inspection report for this service, carried out on 22nd June 2010.
CQC found this care home to be providing an Good service.
The inspector made no statutory requirements on the home as a result of this inspection and there were no outstanding actions from the previous inspection report.
Other inspections for this house
Similar services:
What follows are excerpts from this inspection report. For more information read the full report on the next tab.
What the care home does well
Three requirements were identified at the last key inspection, these have been met. They were that the home must follow up information from a resident`s assessment, which they now do. That CQC must be provided with a copy of the electrical installation and evidence that the homes gas boiler has been serviced, this was confirmed at the visit. The home carries out comprehensive pre-admission assessments and obtains assessments and care plans from care managers and information from health care professionals. The records showed that people have their needs thoroughly assessed before moving into the home. Each resident has an individual are plan completed from information gathered in the preadmission assessment and added to throughout the placement. A range of assessments were used to identify people`s current health and personal care needs. This included assessments specific to assessing mental health and mental capacity of people with dementia and risks associated with vulnerability. Care plans were person centred and sensitively recorded and clearly showed individual`s preferences. There was evidence that plans had been updated following changes to people`s needs. The care plans were evaluated at least monthly in good detail. Staff maintain ongoing day and night reports on each person and supplementary records and charts to monitor personal hygiene, skin integrity, food intake, continence management, Temperature Pulse and Respirations, and general observations of their health and condition. Care records showed good communication with relatives including involvement in assessing needs, obtaining information on people`s background and social interests, and attending care reviews. This was confirmed by a visiting relative who told us that staff keep the family well informed about his mother`s welfare. He said he was very happy with the care and medical support provided. Physical and mental health needs were addressed in care plans and records showed people living at the home access a range of health care health care professionals. People`s nutritional needs were monitored well and records for individuals who had been identified as being nutritionally at risk showed good weight gain was achieved. Medication is administered by trained staff. Medication records have a front sheet profilewith a photograph of the person and details of their GP and any allergies. Directions for prescribed medication were clearly recorded and the administration records were appropriately completed. Social profiles were recorded and people have care plans to meet their social needs. The home employs an activities co-ordinator and information about the activities was displayed in the home. We observed flexible routines such as people choosing to get up later and being offered breakfast and medication throughout the morning. Personal choices and support with making decisions in daily living were built into care plans for people with cognitive impairment. The meal time for the residents on the ground (general nursing unit) was a positive experience with people being offered the opportunity to have the meal either in the dining room or in the garden area. There is a table and chairs set out with a large umbrella to offer protection from the sun and this is used for social activity and meal times when the weather permits. Residents were being served one of the two options available on the day from which they were asked their preference the day before. One was served a salad that was not on the "usual menu" choice. People were being supported to have their meals by staff who were calm and sensitive to their needs. They were chatting to them and offering general encouragement to eat and drink. Preference sheets for this unit, to show people`s choice of meals, were kept. Those available demonstrated that they were being supported to make choices of meals. The food was well presented, nutritious and was well received by the residents. However as the meals are "pre-plated" by the kitchen the residents do not have the opportunity to have those vegetables that they do not like omitted from the meal. The home was clean and odour free and comfortably furnished. The upper floor unit is enhanced with areas of interest and tactile art, street signs and pictures of old Newcastle. Residents choose where to spend their time and some were in the lounges and in the garden while some spent their time in the bedrooms.
What the care home could do better:
One inspector observed lunch being served on the upper floor unit for people with dementia. The day`s menu was not displayed. Everyone was served the same main meal and pudding and no other options were offered. A person who had a soft diet was provided with only custard for pudding. Most staff were generally supportive and encouraging and two staff sat with people and assisted them with their meals. However the meal time was not well organised and there was delays to people receiving help to cut up food and to the pudding being served. Preference sheets for this unit, to show people`s choice of meals, were not being kept or monitored. Those available demonstrated little variation and it was questionable as to whether people were being actively offered choice of meals.