Inspection on 27/05/10 for Cheriton
Also see our care home review for Cheriton for more information
This is the latest available inspection report for this service, carried out on 27th May 2010.
CQC found this care home to be providing an Good service.
The inspector found no outstanding requirements from the previous inspection report, but made 1 statutory requirements (actions the home must comply with) as a result of this inspection.
Other inspections for this house
Similar services:
What follows are excerpts from this inspection report. For more information read the full report on the next tab.
What the care home does well
Visual observations of people using this service showed that people were smartly dressed including jewelery, make up and nail varnish. People were seen to be wearing the aids needed, for example hearing aids and clean glasses. The procedures for the administration of medicines were examined during this inspection. At this visit we looked at the medication administration record (MAR) charts, medication supplies and care plans for two people whose care was being looked at as part of this inspection. The home uses a monitored dosage system (MDS) and medicines are stored appropriately in a mobile, lockable trolley which is kept in a locked staff office. Medication administration records (MAR) were examined and show no omissions. There is guidance in place for `when required/when needed` (PRN) medicines should be given and these include information about when to administer the medication and any triggers or indicators known that shows the medication is needed. Records demonstrate that all senior care staff and night staff have completed medication training. A tour of the premises was undertaken with the deputy manager. Continued improvements to the environment have been completed and include the installation of a new shower room, the provision of electronic hoists to assist in bathing, the addition of en suite facilities to a number of bedrooms, replacing the hot water system with a new system to ensure a continuous supply of hot water and the redecorating and re-carpeting of some bedrooms and one of the communal lounges. Further refurbishment plans are in place and scheduled to be undertaken in the near future. A requirement set at the previous key inspection was that used gloves and aprons are not disposed of in generalwaste bins. The registered manager and the deputy manager confirmed that used gloves and aprons are now disposed of appropriately following Infection Control guidance. At the previous key inspection a requirement was issued for references for overseas employees to be checked for authenticity to ensure that people using services are not put at risk. The file for the most newly employed staff member was examined at this visit. This contained evidence of all the necessary employment checks as required by the Care Homes Regulations for Older people. Surveys received from people who use the service as part of the previous Annual Service Review contained some concerns regarding the provision of activities in the home. The range and variety of activities were examined as part of this visit fand the registered manager said they have been exploring different types of activities following the Annual Service Review. Activities are displayed on a notice board. Various visiting entertainers visit the home on a weekly and fortnightly basis. An arts and craft instructor and Pets for Therapy visit the home fortnightly. The inspector was informed that there are no designated care staff who undertake activities but staff do carry out activities with people using the service in the afternoons. These include Bingo, board games and shopping trips. Involvement with the local community includes visits by the local schools, a visiting hairdresser and a monthly church service. There are regular residents meetings and it is noted that feedback about the recent activity programme has been sought and recorded.
What the care home could do better:
Two care plans were examined as part of the inspection for people who have recently been admitted to the home. Care plans are written every month. Although these cover a wide range of areas such as personal care, health care needs and socialisation, the care plans lack details and do not fully inform the care worker how the service user needs will be met. For example, in the first care plan under the section for personal care the entry reads, "1 carer to assist with all personal care" and under the section for socialisation the entry reads "likes to chat" and there is no information about the support required for oral healthcare. In the second care plan under the section for personal care the entry reads, "1 carer to assist with personal care" and "1 carer to assist with applying cream to body". The second entry does not give the name of the cream, what it is used for and how often the cream is to be applied. Overall the care plans are not person centered and entries are vague. They do not describe in detail the actions staff need to take to fully meet the needs of the individual. This should include peoples individual preferences likes and dislikes. A requirement is issued for improvement in this area. Surveys received from people who use the service as part of the previous Annual Service Review contained some concerns regarding the provision of meals. Comments included, "less able residents are rushed during mealtimes" an example being given of some staff filling peoples drinks to the brim and hurrying them to drink their drink before they have managed to swallow their food. As part of this visit a lunch time meal was observed inthe quiet lounge which is where people who are more dependant take their meals. The menu is displayed on a board in the main hallway. This does not display an alternative choice of meal. However the weekly menu is also displayed on the notice board and this states, alternatives offered, salad, baked potato and soup. The lunch time meal is the main meal of the day and the choice or alternative meal offered must be of the same nutritional value as the main meal. This should be addressed. Some people required assistance to eat their meal and during the lunchtime meal the inspector observed several areas of poor practice. Several residents had pureed meals. These had all the portions of the meal pureed together resulting in a grey mass which was indistinguishable. The meals were put in front of the service users and staff failed to inform individual what their meal was. The presentation of pureed food should be improved and the home should address this. One staff member was assisting two people to eat their meal. She gave the two residents a spoon of their meal in turn. She was observed to get up from her chair several times whilst assisting both service users to eat. This resulted in an uncongenial and impersonal mealtime. The individual techniques of staff when providing assistance to service users must be enhanced and the home should ensure care staff are aware of this. It was observed that overall staff interaction with service users was good. One person at the dining table appeared disorientated and was becoming anxious. Staff`s approach was positive, they knew how to approach the person in an appropriate manner and were able to provide the necessary support required.