Inspection on 27/05/10 for Pavilion Court
Also see our care home review for Pavilion Court for more information
This is the latest available inspection report for this service, carried out on 27th May 2010.
CQC found this care home to be providing an Adequate service.
The inspector made no statutory requirements on the home as a result of this inspection and there were no outstanding actions from the previous inspection report.
What follows are excerpts from this inspection report. For more information read the full report on the next tab.
What the care home does well
Good assessments are carried out before anyone is offered a place in the home. This makes sure that their care can be properly planned and that they can be confident that their needs will be met. The assessment includes, where applicable, information from health professionals involved in the care of the person. Each person living in the home has a care plan which included a range of assessments used to identify peoples health and personal care needs and risks associated with the individuals vulnerability. Care plans were recorded to a good standard and matched with assessed needs. They were often sensitively recorded and indicated peoples preferences, though preference for gender of carer to assist with personal care was not always included. The plans were regularly evaluated and there is a plan in place for this to be developed further to include greater detail to show whether they were working towards achieving the stated goals and aims. Day and night staff maintain ongoing daily reports on each person and supplementary records such personal hygiene charts, body mapping of skin integrity and observation records were well completed. Charts relating to assistance with toileting to meet continence needs were not being consistently recorded and monitored to establish patterns. Care plans were in place for physical and mental health care needs and incorporated advice from health professionals. Professional visitor records showed people receive visits from general practitioners, district nurses, chiropodist, dentist, phlebotomist etc. Nutritional needs were monitored through assessment and care planning, recording food and fluid intake, and regular weighing. People are referred to dietitians if they experience weight loss or poor appetite and some people were prescribed nutritional supplements. Catering staff are notified of individual persons dietary needs and preferences. Special diets, extra calorific snacks and milkshakes are offered between meals and the cook routinely fortifies food. People living at the home spoke positively about the care and medical support they receive. They told us that staff are attentive, kind and friendly and said they are treated with respect. Staff spoken to were knowledgeable about individuals and their needs. Medication is administered by trained staff. Medication records have a front sheet profile with a photograph of the person and details of medical history and allergies. Handwrittendirections for prescribed medication were clearly recorded. The records examined were appropriately signed to verify that medication was given. Social profiles were recorded and people have care plans to address their social needs. Charts are recorded to show the activities that each person has participated in. A minibus that is shared between other care homes in the region was used to take people on regular outings. On the day of the inspection some service users went on a trip to Morpeth Park and the previous week there had been a trip to Beamish. Residents spoken to described the pleasure they had from the outings. One persons records examined had evidence of a mental capacity assessment being carried out and a care plan to address restrictions relating to deprivation of liberty. The home was comfortable and attractively decorated and furnished. The reception has been enhanced by creating a cafe, shop with tables and chairs and this area was well used by visitors and service users. People living at the home told us they were happy with their accommodation. One service user commented that she enjoys watching the sports that are played on the pavilion from her bedroom. There is a good process for recruitment and selection of new staff to the home. This is being followed by the Manager and the records show that she is being careful about selecting new staff to make sure that they will be suitable for the home. Staff records show that they receive training to give them the skills they need to carry out their role. There is a training matrix which is used by the manager to make sure that she can plan appropriate training for the staff in both health and safety and clinical areas. The number of staff who have received dementia training is low, however a senior member of staff has completed a `train the trainer` dementia course and is qualified to deliver this training to the staff team, this is being planned. The home Manager has been in post since November 2009 she was appointed to the home at a time when there were some issues around the quality of the service being offered. The Manager, Regional Manager and the staff have worked hard to make the necessary improvements and the quality of the care being provided ensures that the outcomes for people living in the home are good. The manager is in the process of applying to the Commission to be approved as the Registered Manager.
What the care home could do better:
On the day one inspector dined with people some of the residents. Menus were not displayed. The meal was steak pie, potato and vegetables or kedgeree, followed by fruit salad and cream. Tables were nicely set though the availability of condiments was variable. However, there was a significant delay in the food arriving and people became restless. Food was served from a hot trolley and the meals, including soft diets, were of good portion size and presented well. Staff offered choice to each person but did not show people the meals to help them decide until instructed to do so by a senior carer. Hot and cold drinks were provided and people were offered second helpings of food. One staff member sat with a service user and helped her with eating the meal. Some peopledid not receive sufficient support to cut up and manage food and assistance was not offered to use condiments. It was also noted that some people might benefit from having aids to help prevent food spillage and preserve their dignity. There were some discrepancies to the codes used for reasons why medication was not given and directions for one service users `as required` medication needed to be clarified. One service user was occasionally having a medication omitted due to being asleep and the manager agreed to follow this up. There was an odour of urine on entering one of the units and this was related to service users needing improved assistance with toileting to meet their continence needs. This was discussed with the Manager and a plan is in place to address this.