Inspection on 11/05/10 for Tudor House Nursing Home
Also see our care home review for Tudor House Nursing Home for more information
This is the latest available inspection report for this service, carried out on 11th May 2010.
CQC found this care home to be providing an Adequate service.
The inspector found no outstanding requirements from the previous inspection report, but made 3 statutory requirements (actions the home must comply with) as a result of this inspection.
Other inspections for this house
Tudor House Nursing Home 31/07/08
Tudor House Nursing Home 22/08/07
Tudor House Nursing Home 11/09/06
Tudor House Nursing Home 11/01/06
Tudor House Nursing Home 08/07/05
Tudor House Nursing Home 25/11/04
Tudor House Nursing Home 01/06/04
Similar services:
Beeches The - North Yorkshire County Council
What follows are excerpts from this inspection report. For more information read the full report on the next tab.
What the care home does well
The survey responses and people that we spoke with confirmed that people are generally contented with their lives at Tudor House. Comments include `the staff are kind, and there seem to be enough of them`. And `they keep me clean, comfortable and warm. They care for me well. I like my home`. All the surveys respond `always` or `usually` to questions like Do you receive the care and support you need? Do the staff listen to you and act on what you say? Does the home make sure you get the medical support you need? All the surveys report that there is someone they can speak with if they are concerned about something. One person spoken with said they would definitely tell someone if another person, including staff, had been unkind or mistreated them. Visitors spoken with were also very satisfied with the care at Tudor House. Comments include `the people here are lovely. I`ve never been concerned about the care here`. Another person said they `were very happy` with the home and had `absolutely no regrets` about supporting their relative to move to there. One person wrote in their survey that `Tudor House is always clean, tidy and fresh`. Another commented `my relative`s medical welfare is always a priority and I am kept informed as to any changes`. Some people are starting to have more interesting lives, where one day is different to another. One person told us they were looking after some seeds that had been planted in the garden and were watering them regularly. We also observed people doing some painting on the day of the visit. The activities person though only works ten hours a week. More hours would enable people`s social needs to be better met, particularly those who stay in their room, perhaps because of their frailty. We looked at all the beds at Tudor House where bed rails have been assessed as needed to keep people safe, because at the last two inspections we have made requirements around bedrail management. Checking the beds showed that there are now much better systems in place to ensure these rails are fitted and stay correctly positioned. However despite these improved systems we did see one bed where care staff had failed to reposition the bedhead correctly. We were told that the bedhead had been removed five days earlier, so that the individual could get their hair washed. The bedhead had not been re-attached to the bed in the correct fittings, but nobody had noticed this. We were told that the home is starting to consult with people about how the home runs, and making changes accordingly. One person spoken with confirmed that they had filled in a questionnaire for the home but said they hadn`t yet received any feedback from their comments. People need to receive feedback so that they know they have been listened to. Staff surveys talk positively about the standard of care they provide. Comments include`it provides a friendly and caring environment for all service users and staff`. And `management is approachable`. They tell us that they get enough support from the management and receive training appropriate for the work they carry out. One carer said that communication within the home has improved in the last year and they thought staff `know more about what`s going on` They added that they now receive supervision, where their work and training needs can be discussed. Another care worker was asked about reporting an incident where someone told them they`d been mistreated. They were very clear that this had to be reported immediately, even if the person asked them not to tell anyone. This is good practice as it shows that staff recognise that they can`t keep those sorts of secrets.
What the care home could do better:
Two people commented in their surveys on the meal provision. One said `I would like to see a more varied teatime meal, with fresh fruit`. And another wrote that they `wanted their meals on time`. People spoken with though told us that the meals were `pretty good` and `ok`. The manager should consider carrying out her own survey about meals at the home to get everyone`s views. We looked at some care plans and risk assessments related to bedrail management. Whilst these were generally satisfactory, they need to be more specific for people`s individual circumstances. For example whilst protective `bumpers` were widely used one person had just one bedrail, which they used to help them sit up in bed. So a bumper wasn`t used. However they had signed their consent for bedrails and protective `bumpers` to be used on their bed. And the home had not completed an assessment of risk of harm by not using the bumper, the proper use of which prevents entrapment. We carried out an assessment (called a SOFI, standing for Short Observational Framework Inspection) on the Dementia Care Unit. We did this because there have been several incidents in recent weeks where people have been harmed or put at risk of harm by the behaviours of other people living on the unit. We wanted to observe how this unit was running. This assessment showed that people were spoken with in a kindly and gentle manner, but their lives were not very enriched and there were significant periods of time where they received neither verbal nor non-verbal interactions from care staff. Whilst this did not appear to cause them any anxiety, the observation overall was not very positive. We discussed the care plans with one carer, who told us they thought that the records had improved in the past year. Some staff writing though is very difficult to read and the carer confirmed that they could not always read what was written. Care plans must be legible so that care staff can read them, to confirm that they are giving the right care.