CARE HOMES FOR OLDER PEOPLE
Coumes Brook Cockshutts Lane Oughtibridge Sheffield S35 0FX Lead Inspector
Janis Robinson Unannounced 24 May 2005 09:00 The Commission for Social Care Inspection aims to: • • • • Put the people who use social care first Improve services and stamp out bad practice Be an expert voice on social care Practise what we preach in our own organisation Reader Information
Document Purpose Author Audience Further copies from Copyright Inspection Report CSCI General Public 0870 240 7535 (telephone order line) This report is copyright Commission for Social Care Inspection (CSCI) and may only be used in its entirety. Extracts may not be used or reproduced without the express permission of CSCI www.csci.org.uk Internet address This is a report of an inspection to assess whether services are meeting the needs of people who use them. The legal basis for conducting inspections is the Care Standards Act 2000 and the relevant National Minimum Standards for this establishment are those for Care Homes for Older People. They can be found at www.dh.gov.uk or obtained from The Stationery Office (TSO) PO Box 29, St Crispins, Duke Street, Norwich, NR3 1GN. Tel: 0870 600 5522. Online ordering: www.tso.co.uk/bookshop This report is a public document. Extracts may not be used or reproduced without the prior permission of the Commission for Social Care Inspection. Coumes Brook CS0000002950.V203243.R01.doc Version 1.30 Page 3 SERVICE INFORMATION
Name of service Coumes Brook Address Cockshutts Lane Oughtibridge Sheffield S35 0FX 0114 2862211 0114 2862211 None Coumes Brook Home Limited Telephone number Fax number Email address Name of registered provider(s)/company (if applicable) Name of registered manager (if applicable) Type of registration No. of places registered (if applicable) Mrs Wendy Jane Newman PC Care home only 23 Category(ies) of OP Old age (23) registration, with number of places Coumes Brook CS0000002950.V203243.R01.doc Version 1.30 Page 4 SERVICE INFORMATION
Conditions of registration: None Date of last inspection 8 March 2005 Brief Description of the Service: Coumes Brook is a purpose built care home providing personal care for up to 24 older people of both sex. The home is located in the village of Oughtibridge. All of the accommodation provided is on the ground floor. A communal lounge, dining room and conservatory are provided. A central kitchen and laundry serve the home. 21 single and 2 double rooms are provided. All of the rooms have en-suite toilet facilities. 17 bedrooms have en-suite shower facilities. All of the home is accessible to residents. The gardens are landscaped and a patio area is provided. The home has a car park. Coumes Brook CS0000002950.V203243.R01.doc Version 1.30 Page 5 SUMMARY
This is an overview of what the inspector found during the inspection. This inspection was unannounced and took place over 3.5 hours from 9am to 12.30 pm. A tour of the environment took place, and records were sampled. The inspector spoke with all of the staff on duty, ten residents and one visitor to the home. What the service does well:
All of the comments made by residents were very positive. Residents said the home was ‘the best in the country’, ‘can’t be better cared for’, and ‘the staff are wonderful’. The home had a service user guide to provide residents with information about the home. Trial visits to the home, to enable prospective residents and their representatives to make an informed decision, were encouraged by the home. Staff undertook a range of training to keep them up to date and meet residents needs. Each resident had a care plan, which outlined all personal, social and health care needs. Access to health care professionals was supported, to maintain residents health. Residents confirmed that the staff were respectful towards them. The routines at the home were flexible, residents were able to choose how to spend their day. A range of activities were offered to residents. The home had an open visiting policy, to maintain contact with residents and their family and friends. A varied diet was provided and choices were offered. Residents said ‘the food could not be better, nothing is too much trouble’. The home had a complaints procedure, each resident had been provided with a copy to inform them of their rights. All of the residents spoken with said they had confidence in the homes manager, and the staff at the home, to listen to any concerns and take them seriously. An adult protection procedure was in place, to ensure service users safety was promoted. The environment was very well maintained in the majority of areas. The home was very clean and free from odours. Homely touches were provided in communal areas to create a comfortable environment. Residents’ bedrooms were well decorated and individually personalised. Residents were able to bring personal possessions with them into the home. All of the residents spoken with said the home was ‘lovely and comfortable’. Coumes Brook CS0000002950.V203243.R01.doc Version 1.30 Page 6 Agreed levels of staff were being maintained. The home had a commitment to National Vocational Qualifications (NVQ), to ensure staff had the skills needed to meet the needs of residents. Staff undertook a range of training and individual training records were kept . All of the residents and staff said the management at the home was supportive and approachable. Residents’ questionnaires were undertaken to seek their views on the care provided. Formal staff supervision took place, to support and develop the staff team. Health and safety systems were in place at the home, fire equipment had been checked and serviced. Staff had undertaken fire training at the required frequency to ensure they had the skills to maintain safety and respond in an emergency. What has improved since the last inspection? What they could do better:
Whilst care plans contained an ‘End of Life’ plan, to ensure residents wishes had been sought and could be carried out, these required completing for all residents. The environment was maintained to a very high standard in the majority of the home. One replacement panel for the homes bath was on order to improve facilities. One small area of a corridor carpet was showing signs of wear. A proportion of cupboards in the kitchen were worn, ill fitting or missing. An audit of staff mandatory training to ensure all staff are up to date needed to be undertaken. Records indicated that two staff had not undertaken moving and handling training at the required frequency. The recommended 50 of care staff trained to NVQ level 2 in care had almost been achieved.
Coumes Brook CS0000002950.V203243.R01.doc Version 1.30 Page 7 One resident was mobilised without footplates in use. A written risk assessment had not been undertaken. An appropriate risk assessment was undertaken and forwarded to the Commission for Social Care Inspection (CSCI) the day following this inspection. Please contact the provider for advice of actions taken in response to this inspection. The report of this inspection is available from enquiries@csci.gsi.gov.uk or by contacting your local CSCI office. Coumes Brook CS0000002950.V203243.R01.doc Version 1.30 Page 8 DETAILS OF INSPECTOR FINDINGS CONTENTS
Choice of Home (Standards 1–6) Health and Personal Care (Standards 7-11) Daily Life and Social Activities (Standards 12-15) Complaints and Protection (Standards 16-18) Environment (Standards 19-26) Staffing (Standards 27-30) Management and Administration (Standards 31-38) Scoring of Standards Statutory Requirements Identified During the Inspection Coumes Brook CS0000002950.V203243.R01.doc Version 1.30 Page 9 Choice of Home
The intended outcomes for Standards 1 – 6 are: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Prospective service users have the information they need to make an informed choice about where to live. Each service user has a written contract/ statement of terms and conditions with the home. No service user moves into the home without having had his/her needs assessed and been assured that these will be met. Service users and their representatives know that the home they enter will meet their needs. Prospective service users and their relatives and friends have an opportunity to visit and assess the quality, facilities and suitability of the home. Service users assessed and referred solely for intermediate care are helped to maximise their independence and return home. The Commission considers Standards 3 and 6 the key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for standard(s) 1,3,4 and 5. The home had a statement of purpose and service user guide, to inform residents about the home. Assessments of needs were undertaken prior to admission to ensure the home could meet the needs of the prospective resident. Trial visits to the home were encouraged to enable prospective service users to look around the home, meet residents and staff. Staff undertook periodic training to keep them up to date and access to specialist services was provided by the home, in order that all needs were met. EVIDENCE: Each resident had been provided with a service user guide, to inform him or her about the home. Assessments of needs were seen in the plan checked. Copies of social workers assessments were obtained prior to admission, if available, to give the home the information needed to ascertain if needs could be met. Coumes Brook CS0000002950.V203243.R01.doc Version 1.30 Page 10 All of the residents spoken with felt the home met their needs. One resident said ‘I couldn’t be better looked after’, and a further resident said ‘The home is wonderful, I couldn’t ask for anything more’. Access to relevant specialists was supported by the home. One resident informed the inspector that the home supported them in maintaining contact with their Eye Specialist every three months. The residents and visitor spoken with confirmed that they had been able to look around the home, stay for a meal and meet residents and staff to provide them with the information they needed before choosing to move in. Coumes Brook CS0000002950.V203243.R01.doc Version 1.30 Page 11 Health and Personal Care
The intended outcomes for Standards 7 – 11 are: 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. The service user’s health, personal and social care needs are set out in an individual plan of care. Service users’ health care needs are fully met. Service users, where appropriate, are responsible for their own medication, and are protected by the home’s policies and procedures for dealing with medicines. Service users feel they are treated with respect and their right to privacy is upheld. Service users are assured that at the time of their death, staff will treat them and their family with care, sensitivity and respect. The Commission considers Standards 7, 8, 9 and 10 the key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for standard(s) 7,8,10 and 11. Each resident had a care plan, to give staff the information needed to ensure all care needs were met. Health care was monitored, assessed and met. Staff respected residents privacy and appeared respectful towards residents. Each care plan contained a section on ‘End of Life’ care, to ensure residents wishes were sought and carried out. This plan had not been completed in one care plan seen. EVIDENCE: Care plans contained the full range of information required. These contained specific information on all aspects of personal, social and health care needs. The plans included information on the staff action required to ensure assessed needs were met. The residents had signed their plans. Residents spoken with were aware of their right to access their records, but chose not to do so. The plans contained detail of all health care contacts, appointments and treatments, and the home supported access to these to ensure health was maintained. Coumes Brook CS0000002950.V203243.R01.doc Version 1.30 Page 12 Staff were observed respecting privacy by knocking on doors before entering. The interactions between staff and residents appeared respectful and caring. Staff took time to sit and listen to residents. All of the staff displayed a high level of commitment to the residents and the home. Residents spoken to made very positive comments about their care. One resident told the inspector `I was very worried about moving to a home, and losing my independence. It is as good as living in your own home here. I have no regrets’. Residents said` The home is wonderful, you could not wish for more’ and `I can’t think of how I could be better cared for’. The visitor spoken with said they were `very happy’ with the care provided at the home. They told the inspector that they were kept well informed by the home, and had no concerns. One care plan did not record any wishes regarding dying and death. These must be sought to ensure they are carried out. Coumes Brook CS0000002950.V203243.R01.doc Version 1.30 Page 13 Daily Life and Social Activities
The intended outcomes for Standards 12 - 15 are: 12. 13. 14. 15. Service users find the lifestyle experienced in the home matches their expectations and preferences, and satisfies their social, cultural, religious and recreational interests and needs. Service users maintain contact with family/ friends/ representatives and the local community as they wish. Service users are helped to exercise choice and control over their lives. Service users receive a wholesome appealing balanced diet in pleasing surroundings at times convenient to them. The Commission considers all of the above key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for standard(s) 12,13,14 and 15. Residents were able to make choices about how they spent their time. A range of activities were offered to residents, to improve choices and maintain interests. The home had an open visiting policy, in order to develop and maintain good relationships with residents’ representatives. The home provided a varied menu and choices were offered to respect personal preferences. EVIDENCE: Residents said they were able to get up and go to bed when they chose, and were seen to walk freely around the home. The home had a volunteer worker who helped to an provide a range of appropriate social opportunities both in and outside of the home. Residents were free to join in any organised activities. All of the residents spoken with said they enjoyed the range of activities offered, and said enough were provided. Two resident told the inspector that they were looking forward to the weekly quiz that was being held on the day of this inspection. Residents confirmed that they were able to see their visitors in private. The visitor spoken with said they were able to visit at any time, and were `always made to feel welcome’. Visitors were always able to stay for a meal with their relative. Coumes Brook CS0000002950.V203243.R01.doc Version 1.30 Page 14 Residents were able to bring personal items with them into the home. All of the bedrooms were individually personalised and very homely. All of the residents spoken with said the food at the home was very good, choices were offered on a daily basis. One resident said that `Nothing was too much trouble’. Staff confirmed that they had access to food supplies at all times, to cater for residents needs. The cook had a clear understanding of residents individual preferences and displayed a high level of commitment to ensuring residents were happy with the food provided. The homes dining room was attractively set out. Coumes Brook CS0000002950.V203243.R01.doc Version 1.30 Page 15 Complaints and Protection
The intended outcomes for Standards 16 - 18 are: 16. 17. 18. Service users and their relatives and friends are confident that their complaints will be listened to, taken seriously and acted upon. Service users’ legal rights are protected. Service users are protected from abuse. The Commission considers Standards 16 and 18 the key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for standard(s) 16,17 and 18. The home had a clear and accessible complaints procedure, to ensure residents’ rights were protected and any concerns listened to and taken seriously. Information on advocacy services was on display in the home. An adult protection procedure was in place, to promote residents safety. EVIDENCE: Each resident and representative had been provided with a copy of the homes complaints procedure. This contained relevant detail and informed the reader of who to contact outside of the home to make a complaint, should they wish to do so. All of the residents said they had no concerns and could go to the managers and staff to`sort out’ any worries if they had them. No complaints had been received by the home. Residents had been provided with information on local advocacy services, and a leaflet was on display in the entrance area containing information on who to contact for advocacy services, should the resident want an independent representative. Residents confirmed that they had been given the opportunity to vote at the recent election. Since the last inspection the homes Adult Protection procedure had been updated to include a copy of local multi-agency guidelines, to ensure the homes information remained up to date and promote residents safety. Residents said they felt very safe at the home. Coumes Brook CS0000002950.V203243.R01.doc Version 1.30 Page 16 Environment
The intended outcomes for Standards 19 – 26 are: 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. Service users live in a safe, well-maintained environment. Service users have access to safe and comfortable indoor and outdoor communal facilities. Service users have sufficient and suitable lavatories and washing facilities. Service users have the specialist equipment they require to maximise their independence. Service users’ own rooms suit their needs. Service users live in safe, comfortable bedrooms with their own possessions around them. Service users live in safe, comfortable surroundings. The home is clean, pleasant and hygienic. The Commission considers Standards 19 and 26 the key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for standard(s) 19,20,21,22,23,24,25 and 26. The majority of the home was maintained to a very high standard. The home was very clean and free from odours. The building complied with the requirements of the fire service. Appropriate facilities were provided to meet residents needs. All areas of the home were accessible to residents. Homely touches had been provided to create a comfortable environment. Communal areas were well maintained, and residents’ bedrooms were well decorated and personalised. Some refurbishment was required in the homes kitchen and bathroom. One very small section of a corridor carpet was worn. Coumes Brook CS0000002950.V203243.R01.doc Version 1.30 Page 17 EVIDENCE: The home was decorated to a high standard. Communal areas were attractive, comfortable and the furniture provided was of a good standard. The home had a pleasant conservatory, and a large patio area had been built and garden seating provided for residents enjoyment. All of the bedrooms were well decorated and highly individual. All bedrooms had door locks to promote residents privacy, if required. 21 of the bedrooms had en-suite toilet facilities, 17 rooms had en-suite toilet and shower facilities. The home had a communal bathroom in addition to these facilities. All of the residents said that they were very happy with the accommodation provided. The homes kitchen had been partially refurbished. However, some cupboards were ill fitting or had drawer fronts missing. These must be replaced to maintain the high standards in the home. A replacement bath panel had been ordered to improve the homes bathroom. Coumes Brook CS0000002950.V203243.R01.doc Version 1.30 Page 18 Staffing
The intended outcomes for Standards 27 – 30 are: 27. 28. 29. 30. Service users needs are met by the numbers and skill mix of staff. Service users are in safe hands at all times. Service users are supported and protected by the home’s recruitment policy and practices. Staff are trained and competent to do their jobs. The Commission considers Standards 27, 29, and 30 the key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for standard(s) 27,28 and 30. Agreed levels of staff were being maintained. Some staff undertook NVQ training. Recommended levels of NVQ trained staff had almost been achieved. Staff undertook periodic training to keep them up to date. The home had a training plan and individual training records were kept to monitor staff training. EVIDENCE: The homes rota indicated that agreed levels of staff were being maintained to meet the needs of residents. Residents and the visitor spoken with felt that enough staff were provided. Of the 18 care staff, 7 staff had achieved NVQ level 2 in care. This did not quite meet the recommended 50 of the care staff trained to NVQ level 2 in care by 2005, to ensure the staff team was qualified and competent to carry out their duties. However, the home had recruited a member of care staff who was also a qualified NVQ assessor, which will support further staff undertaking the award. The manager confirmed that CRB (Criminal Records Bureau) and POVA (Protection of Vulnerable Adults) checks had been completed for all staff. Staff training records were maintained to ensure all staff had undertaken relevant training. Staff spoken to said that they received sufficient training to be able to carry out their duties. Coumes Brook CS0000002950.V203243.R01.doc Version 1.30 Page 19 Management and Administration
The intended outcomes for Standards 31 – 38 are: 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. Service users live in a home which is run and managed by a person who is fit to be in charge, of good character and able to discharge his or her responsibilities fully. Service users benefit from the ethos, leadership and management approach of the home. The home is run in the best interests of service users. Service users are safeguarded by the accounting and financial procedures of the home. Service users’ financial interests are safeguarded. Staff are appropriately supervised. Service users’ rights and best interests are safeguarded by the home’s record keeping, policies and procedures. The health, safety and welfare of service users and staff are promoted and protected. The Commission considers Standards 33, 35 and 38 the key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for standard(s) 31,32,33,36,37 and 38. The manager’s leadership approach benefited residents and staff. The home had a quality assurance system in place, to seek the views of residents and their representatives. Formal staff supervision, to develop and support staff, took place. The homes records were stored securely, to respect residents’ rights. Policies and procedures for the smooth running of the home and care of residents were in place and accessible to staff. Staff undertook mandatory training. Some updates on moving and handling training were required. Fire systems were checked and serviced. All staff had undertaken fire training at the required frequency. Coumes Brook CS0000002950.V203243.R01.doc Version 1.30 Page 20 EVIDENCE: All of the residents and staff spoken with said the managers at the home were approachable and supportive. The registered manager did not hold an NVQ qualification at level 4 in management and care. Whilst provider reports, in line with Regulation 26, took place, records of these required more detail in order that sufficient information is sought to monitor all aspects of the home. Questionnaires to seek the views of residents were undertaken. Formal staff supervision took place, to support staff and develop their skills. Records in the home were securely stored to protect confidential information. The home had health and safety systems in place. On the day of the inspection no fire exits were blocked and hazardous substances were securely stored. All staff undertook mandatory training and a matrix was maintained to enable managers to monitor this. Records indicated that two staff were out of date with moving and handling training. One resident was moved in a wheelchair without footplates in use. The individuals care plan did not include a written risk assessment to evidence that this practice was in response to assessed need. The manager undertook this written assessment and forwarded it to the CSCI the day following this inspection. Coumes Brook CS0000002950.V203243.R01.doc Version 1.30 Page 21 SCORING OF OUTCOMES
This page summarises the assessment of the extent to which the National Minimum Standards for Care Homes for Older People have been met and uses the following scale. The scale ranges from:
4 Standard Exceeded 2 Standard Almost Met (Commendable) (Minor Shortfalls) 3 Standard Met 1 Standard Not Met (No Shortfalls) (Major Shortfalls) “X” in the standard met box denotes standard not assessed on this occasion “N/A” in the standard met box denotes standard not applicable
CHOICE OF HOME ENVIRONMENT Standard No 1 2 3 4 5 6 Score Standard No 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Score 3 x 3 3 3 N/A HEALTH AND PERSONAL CARE Standard No Score 7 3 8 3 9 x 10 4 11 2 DAILY LIFE AND SOCIAL ACTIVITIES Standard No Score 12 3 13 3 14 3 15 4
COMPLAINTS AND PROTECTION 2 4 3 3 3 4 3 3 STAFFING Standard No Score 27 3 28 2 29 x 30 3 MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION Standard No 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 Score Standard No 16 17 18 Score 3 3 3 3 2 2 x x 3 3 2 Coumes Brook CS0000002950.V203243.R01.doc Version 1.30 Page 22 Are there any outstanding requirements from the last inspection? Yes STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS This section sets out the actions which must be taken so that the registered person/s meets the Care Standards Act 2000, Care Homes Regulations 2001 and the National Minimum Standards. The Registered Provider(s) must comply with the given timescales. No. 1. Standard 11 Regulation 12 Requirement Residents wishes regarding long term care and funeral arrangements must be sought and recorded in thier care plan. Where this information has been refused, or will be sought from family at the appropriate time, this must also be recorded. The damaged bath panel must be replaced. (Previous timescale of 30/04/05 not met) The damaged kitchen cupboards must be replaced. Regulation 26 provider visit reports must contain sufficient detail to monitor and assess the running of the home. An Audit of staff mandatory training must take place and training provided for any identified gaps. The identified staff must undertake Moving and Handling training. Residents must not be moved in wheelchairs without footplates in place unless a written risk assessment has`been undertaken. The identified resident must
CS0000002950.V203243.R01.doc Timescale for action 31/08/05 2. 19 23 31/07/05 3. 4. 19 33 23 26 31/08/05 31/08/05 5. 38 13 31/07/05 6. 38 13 Within one week of the date of this inspection. This was
Page 23 Coumes Brook Version 1.30 have such a risk assessment undertaken, and a copy forwarded to the CSCI actioned the day following the inspection. RECOMMENDATIONS These recommendations relate to National Minimum Standards and are seen as good practice for the Registered Provider/s to consider carrying out. No. 1. 2. 3. Refer to Standard 19 28 31 Good Practice Recommendations The worn section of corridor carpet should be identified for replacement in the homes maintenence plan. 50 of the staff team must acheive NVQ level 2 in care by 2005. The managers must acheive NVQ level 4 in management by 2005. Coumes Brook CS0000002950.V203243.R01.doc Version 1.30 Page 24 Commission for Social Care Inspection Ground floor, Unit 3 Waterside Court Bold Street Sheffield, S9 2LR National Enquiry Line: 0845 015 0120 Email: enquiries@csci.gsi.gov.uk Web: www.csci.org.uk
© This report is copyright Commission for Social Care Inspection (CSCI) and may only be used in its entirety. Extracts may not be used or reproduced without the express permission of CSCI Coumes Brook CS0000002950.V203243.R01.doc Version 1.30 Page 25 - Please note that this information is included on www.bestcarehome.co.uk under license from the regulator. Re-publishing this information is in breach of the terms of use of that website. Discrete codes and changes have been inserted throughout the textual data shown on the site that will provide incontrovertable proof of copying in the event this information is re-published on other websites. The policy of www.bestcarehome.co.uk is to use all legal avenues to pursue such offenders, including recovery of costs. You have been warned!
