Please wait

Please note that the information on this website is now out of date. It is planned that we will update and relaunch, but for now is of historical interest only and we suggest you visit cqc.org.uk

Inspection on 23/01/06 for Peppard House

Also see our care home review for Peppard House for more information

This inspection was carried out on 23rd January 2006.

CSCI has not published a star rating for this report, though using similar criteria we estimate that the report is Good. The way we rate inspection reports is consistent for all houses, though please be aware that this may be different from an official CSCI judgement.

The inspector made no statutory requirements on the home as a result of this inspection and there were no outstanding actions from the previous inspection report.

What follows are excerpts from this inspection report. For more information read the full report on the next tab.

What the care home does well

Service users live in a spacious, well decorated and clean home. Systems are in place to review how well the service users are being cared for. Service users are protected from abuse. The manager employs safe working practices to ensure the safety of service users.

What has improved since the last inspection?

The lounge and dining room have been decorated.

What the care home could do better:

Repair the broken tiles in the first floor bathroom.

CARE HOME ADULTS 18-65 Peppard House 45 Woodcote Road Caversham Reading Berkshire RG4 7BB Lead Inspector Robert Dawes Unannounced Inspection 23rd January 2006 12:15p Peppard House DS0000011090.V266910.R01.S.doc Version 5.1 Page 1 The Commission for Social Care Inspection aims to: • • • • Put the people who use social care first Improve services and stamp out bad practice Be an expert voice on social care Practise what we preach in our own organisation Reader Information Document Purpose Author Audience Further copies from Copyright Inspection Report CSCI General Public 0870 240 7535 (telephone order line) This report is copyright Commission for Social Care Inspection (CSCI) and may only be used in its entirety. Extracts may not be used or reproduced without the express permission of CSCI www.csci.org.uk Internet address Peppard House DS0000011090.V266910.R01.S.doc Version 5.1 Page 2 This is a report of an inspection to assess whether services are meeting the needs of people who use them. The legal basis for conducting inspections is the Care Standards Act 2000 and the relevant National Minimum Standards for this establishment are those for Care Homes for Adults 18-65. They can be found at www.dh.gov.uk or obtained from The Stationery Office (TSO) PO Box 29, St Crispins, Duke Street, Norwich, NR3 1GN. Tel: 0870 600 5522. Online ordering: www.tso.co.uk/bookshop This report is a public document. Extracts may not be used or reproduced without the prior permission of the Commission for Social Care Inspection. Peppard House DS0000011090.V266910.R01.S.doc Version 5.1 Page 3 SERVICE INFORMATION Name of service Peppard House Address 45 Woodcote Road Caversham Reading Berkshire RG4 7BB 0118 947 2067 0118 946 4014 Telephone number Fax number Email address Provider Web address Name of registered provider(s)/company (if applicable) Name of registered manager (if applicable) Type of registration No. of places registered (if applicable) Choice Limited Mrs Jennifer Mary Thwaite Care Home 7 Category(ies) of Learning disability (7), Learning disability over registration, with number 65 years of age (7) of places Peppard House DS0000011090.V266910.R01.S.doc Version 5.1 Page 4 SERVICE INFORMATION Conditions of registration: 1. Service users not to be admitted over 65 years of age. Date of last inspection 16th August 2005 Brief Description of the Service: Peppard House provides residential care to seven adults, of both sexes who have learning and associated behavioural disabilities. The house is owned by and the care provided by C.H.O.I.C.E Limited. It is situated in a residential suburb approximately two miles from the town centre, it has its own transport and is on a public transport route. The house is a large three storied building, with bedrooms on the first floor, there is ample communal space and an adequate, well used rear garden. Peppard House DS0000011090.V266910.R01.S.doc Version 5.1 Page 5 SUMMARY This is an overview of what the inspector found during the inspection. This was a routine unannounced inspection, which was carried out during the day on Monday 23rd January 2006. The Inspector spoke with the manager, toured the premises and looked at records. Seven standards were assessed of which all were met. No requirements and one recommendation were made. What the service does well: What has improved since the last inspection? What they could do better: Please contact the provider for advice of actions taken in response to this inspection. The report of this inspection is available from enquiries@csci.gsi.gov.uk or by contacting your local CSCI office. Peppard House DS0000011090.V266910.R01.S.doc Version 5.1 Page 6 DETAILS OF INSPECTOR FINDINGS CONTENTS Choice of Home (Standards 1–5) Individual Needs and Choices (Standards 6-10) Lifestyle (Standards 11-17) Personal and Healthcare Support (Standards 18-21) Concerns, Complaints and Protection (Standards 22-23) Environment (Standards 24-30) Staffing (Standards 31-36) Conduct and Management of the Home (Standards 37 – 43) Scoring of Outcomes Statutory Requirements Identified During the Inspection Peppard House DS0000011090.V266910.R01.S.doc Version 5.1 Page 7 Choice of Home The intended outcomes for Standards 1 – 5 are: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Prospective service users have the information they need to make an informed choice about where to live. Prospective users’ individual aspirations and needs are assessed. Prospective service users know that the home that they will choose will meet their needs and aspirations. Prospective service users have an opportunity to visit and to “test drive” the home. Each service user has an individual written contract or statement of terms and conditions with the home. The Commission consider Standard 2 the key standard to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): Number 2. New service users are admitted only on the basis of a full assessment. EVIDENCE: There have been no new admissions to the home since June 2001. Policies and procedures that fulfil the requirements of the standard are in place. Peppard House DS0000011090.V266910.R01.S.doc Version 5.1 Page 8 Individual Needs and Choices The intended outcomes for Standards 6 – 10 are: 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Service users know their assessed and changing needs and personal goals are reflected in their individual Plan. Service users make decisions about their lives with assistance as needed. Service users are consulted on, and participate in, all aspects of life in the home. Service users are supported to take risks as part of an independent lifestyle. Service users know that information about them is handled appropriately, and that their confidences are kept. The Commission considers Standards 6, 7 and 9 the key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): This section was assessed at the previous inspection. EVIDENCE: Peppard House DS0000011090.V266910.R01.S.doc Version 5.1 Page 9 Lifestyle The intended outcomes for Standards 11 - 17 are: 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. Service users have opportunities for personal development. Service users are able to take part in age, peer and culturally appropriate activities. Service users are part of the local community. Service users engage in appropriate leisure activities. Service users have appropriate personal, family and sexual relationships. Service users’ rights are respected and responsibilities recognised in their daily lives. Service users are offered a healthy diet and enjoy their meals and mealtimes. The Commission considers Standards 12, 13, 15, 16 and 17 the key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): This section was assessed at the previous inspection. EVIDENCE: Peppard House DS0000011090.V266910.R01.S.doc Version 5.1 Page 10 Personal and Healthcare Support The intended outcomes for Standards 18 - 21 are: 18. 19. 20. 21. Service users receive personal support in the way they prefer and require. Service users’ physical and emotional health needs are met. Service users retain, administer and control their own medication where appropriate, and are protected by the home’s policies and procedures for dealing with medicines. The ageing, illness and death of a service user are handled with respect and as the individual would wish. The Commission considers Standards 18, 19, and 20 the key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): This section was assessed at the previous inspection. EVIDENCE: Peppard House DS0000011090.V266910.R01.S.doc Version 5.1 Page 11 Concerns, Complaints and Protection The intended outcomes for Standards 22 – 23 are: 22. 23. Service users feel their views are listened to and acted on. Service users are protected from abuse, neglect and self-harm. The Commission considers Standards 22, and 23 the key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): Numbers 22 and 23. The registered person ensures that there is a clear and effective complaints procedure. Service users are protected from abuse, neglect and self-harm. EVIDENCE: As all the service users have communication difficulties the staff are reminded to be alert to changes in behaviour and mood that could indicate something may have upset them. No complaints have been made since June 2004. A complaints procedure is in place. Leaflets containing a summary of the procedures have been given to relatives and advocates. The manager encourages relatives to tell her of any concerns. Procedures are in place for responding to suspicion or evidence of abuse. All the staff have either attended ‘protection of vulnerable adults’ training or are booked to attend. The majority of staff have been trained in breakaway techniques. Behavioural intervention procedures are included in service users’ files. The home has a policy on staff not receiving money or gifts from service users. The importance of being aware of the possibility of abuse is reinforced at team meetings and during supervision. Peppard House DS0000011090.V266910.R01.S.doc Version 5.1 Page 12 Environment The intended outcomes for Standards 24 – 30 are: 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. Service users live in a homely, comfortable and safe environment. Service users’ bedrooms suit their needs and lifestyles. Service users’ bedrooms promote their independence. Service users’ toilets and bathrooms provide sufficient privacy and meet their individual needs. Shared spaces complement and supplement service users’ individual rooms. Service users have the specialist equipment they require to maximise their independence. The home is clean and hygienic. The Commission considers Standards 24, and 30 the key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): Numbers 24 and 30. Service users live in a homely, comfortable and safe environment. The home is clean and hygienic. EVIDENCE: Peppard House is a spacious home; well decorated and maintained; and is suitable for the service users. Since the last inspection several areas of the home have been decorated. Tiles close to the bath in the first floor bathroom were seen to be broken and cracked which could pose a health risk to service users. The inspector recommended the tiles be replaced. The home was clean, hygienic and free from offensive odours. Peppard House DS0000011090.V266910.R01.S.doc Version 5.1 Page 13 Staffing The intended outcomes for Standards 31 – 36 are: 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. Service users benefit from clarity of staff roles and responsibilities. Service users are supported by competent and qualified staff. Service users are supported by an effective staff team. Service users are supported and protected by the home’s recruitment policy and practices. Service users’ individual and joint needs are met by appropriately trained staff. Service users benefit from well supported and supervised staff. The Commission considers Standards 32, 34 and 35 the key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): This section was assessed at the previous inspection. EVIDENCE: Peppard House DS0000011090.V266910.R01.S.doc Version 5.1 Page 14 Conduct and Management of the Home The intended outcomes for Standards 37 – 43 are: 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. Service users benefit from a well run home. Service users benefit from the ethos, leadership and management approach of the home. Service users are confident their views underpin all self-monitoring, review and development by the home. Service users’ rights and best interests are safeguarded by the home’s policies and procedures. Service users’ rights and best interests are safeguarded by the home’s record keeping policies and procedures. The health, safety and welfare of service users are promoted and protected. Service users benefit from competent and accountable management of the service. The Commission considers Standards 37, 39, and 42 the key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): Numbers 39 and 42. Effective quality assurance and quality monitoring systems are in place. The health, safety and welfare of service users are promoted and protected. EVIDENCE: Service user meetings do not take place because of communication difficulties. Views from service users about how the home is achieving the aims and objectives are gained through observation and during their regular meetings with key workers. Satisfaction questionnaires were sent to relatives, staff and care managers in December 2005. The home has an annual development plan for 2005. An annual development plan for 2006, including the issues raised in the responses from the satisfaction questionnaires, will be produced. Health and safety records seen by the Inspector indicated the manager ensures as far as is reasonably practicable the health, safety and welfare of service users. Peppard House DS0000011090.V266910.R01.S.doc Version 5.1 Page 15 SCORING OF OUTCOMES This page summarises the assessment of the extent to which the National Minimum Standards for Care Homes for Adults 18-65 have been met and uses the following scale. The scale ranges from: 4 Standard Exceeded 2 Standard Almost Met (Commendable) (Minor Shortfalls) 3 Standard Met 1 Standard Not Met (No Shortfalls) (Major Shortfalls) “X” in the standard met box denotes standard not assessed on this occasion “N/A” in the standard met box denotes standard not applicable CHOICE OF HOME Standard No Score 1 X 2 3 3 X 4 X 5 X INDIVIDUAL NEEDS AND CHOICES Standard No 6 7 8 9 10 Score CONCERNS AND COMPLAINTS Standard No Score 22 3 23 3 ENVIRONMENT Standard No Score 24 3 25 X 26 X 27 X 28 X 29 X 30 3 STAFFING Standard No Score 31 X 32 X 33 X 34 X 35 X 36 X CONDUCT AND MANAGEMENT OF THE HOME Standard No 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 Score X X X X X LIFESTYLES Standard No Score 11 X 12 X 13 X 14 X 15 X 16 X 17 X PERSONAL AND HEALTHCARE SUPPORT Standard No 18 19 20 21 Score X X X X X X 3 X X 3 X Peppard House DS0000011090.V266910.R01.S.doc Version 5.1 Page 16 No Are there any outstanding requirements from the last inspection? STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS This section sets out the actions, which must be taken so that the registered person/s meets the Care Standards Act 2000, Care Homes Regulations 2001 and the National Minimum Standards. The Registered Provider(s) must comply with the given timescales. No. Standard Regulation Requirement Timescale for action RECOMMENDATIONS These recommendations relate to National Minimum Standards and are seen as good practice for the Registered Provider/s to consider carrying out. No. 1 Refer to Standard YA24 Good Practice Recommendations Broken bath tiles in the first floor bathroom should be replaced. Peppard House DS0000011090.V266910.R01.S.doc Version 5.1 Page 17 Commission for Social Care Inspection Berkshire Office 2nd Floor 1015 Arlington Business Park Theale, Berks RG7 4SA National Enquiry Line: 0845 015 0120 Email: enquiries@csci.gsi.gov.uk Web: www.csci.org.uk © This report is copyright Commission for Social Care Inspection (CSCI) and may only be used in its entirety. Extracts may not be used or reproduced without the express permission of CSCI Peppard House DS0000011090.V266910.R01.S.doc Version 5.1 Page 18 - Please note that this information is included on www.bestcarehome.co.uk under license from the regulator. Re-publishing this information is in breach of the terms of use of that website. Discrete codes and changes have been inserted throughout the textual data shown on the site that will provide incontrovertable proof of copying in the event this information is re-published on other websites. The policy of www.bestcarehome.co.uk is to use all legal avenues to pursue such offenders, including recovery of costs. You have been warned!