Inspection on 21/04/10 for Harlow Moor Drive (43)
Also see our care home review for Harlow Moor Drive (43) for more information
This is the latest available inspection report for this service, carried out on 21st April 2010.
CQC found this care home to be providing an Excellent service.
The inspector made no statutory requirements on the home as a result of this inspection and there were no outstanding actions from the previous inspection report.
Other inspections for this house
Harlow Moor Drive (43) 05/09/07
Harlow Moor Drive (43) 11/01/06
Harlow Moor Drive (43) 27/06/05
Harlow Moor Drive (43) 01/03/05
Harlow Moor Drive (43) 29/11/04
Harlow Moor Drive (43) 18/02/04
Similar services:
What follows are excerpts from this inspection report. For more information read the full report on the next tab.
What the care home does well
Each person living at the home has their own care plan and record of their care. This is based around the organisations assessment and care planning documentation. The record we looked at showed that a full assessment and introductory process had been completed before the person moved in. This included visits to the home to meet people and make sure it was the right place for the person to live. We looked at people`s care records which showed that people take part in lots of different activities and events. People enjoy activities such as horse riding,going out to the gateway club, country and western night, shopping, the junction, day trips out (on a train) and one person likes going out on a bus. People attend Harrogate college to do courses such as pottery. People living at the home are looking towards planning their holidays for this year. The care record we looked at also showed that people have involvement from other health professionals, such as their dentist, optician and doctors. The medication storage arrangements and recording we looked at showed us that medication is being managed safely by the home. There has been one recent complaint which was investigated by the home and appropriately dealt with. There have been no safeguarding incidents at the home. Staff we spoke to had received safeguarding training and knew how to report any concerns. Three surveys were returned from staff working at the home. When we asked staff what the home does well their comments included, "Attention is given to personal care and support to all service users" and " I think we more that satisfy our service users with different needs." When asked what could the home do better they said, "Organise greater variety of outside activities for service users" and "We should have more hours for our service users".
What the care home could do better:
We found that the standard of the environment during this visit was poor.In one person` s bedroom there was damage to the wall which we were told was water damage. There was also water damage in the office. We were informed that the home was waiting to make sure that the leak is fixed before re-decorating. The office was found to be cluttered and untidy with items such as shaving cream and people`s clothing on a chair and desk. The curtains at the window did not fit properly because they were to short. One person`s room had no shelving and what can only be described as in disarray and cluttered. In the dining room there were three lots of different chairs. A broken chair was stood in the corner. Pictures were propped up against the wall instead of being on the wall. The tablecloth covering the table was worn and discoloured. Cupboard drawers in the sideboard in the dining room had been left open. The kitchen was relatively clean, one kitchen cupboard did not shut properly and one cupboard had a gap and did not fit properly. In the basement where the laundry room was, there were clothes all over the floor. The room next to the laundry was completely overrun with clothes, the coffee table was stained, there was a mattress and base of a bed propped up against the wall. This was discussed with one of the other home`s manager who had temporarily taken over to assist the management of the home in the last two weeks until a new manager commenced in post. She informed me that there has not been a permanent manager at the home for sometime. UBU have employed a manager now who had just commenced working for the organisation. A request was made for a senior manager to come to the home whilst we were there to look at the issues regarding the environment. One of the service managers was able to come to the home and was shown around the home. She agreed that the standard seen was not UBU`s normal standards and would be immediately addressed by the organisation. We asked the organisation to send us an action plan, setting out how these issues were going to be improved. We have now received an action plan from the organisation which clearly outlines their intentions in how they intend to put things right regarding the environment. Because of the prompt response from the organisation in addressing the issues that were raised, we feel that 43 Harlow Moor Drive does continue to provide good outcomes for the people who live there. However we have made one new requirement as a result of this random inspection regarding the standard of the environment.