CARE HOMES FOR OLDER PEOPLE
Carl Court Carl Court Guestland Road Cary Park Torquay Devon TQ1 3NN Lead Inspector
Sharon Goldsworthy Unannounced Inspection 17th November 2005 8.20am X10015.doc Version 1.40 Page 1 The Commission for Social Care Inspection aims to: • • • • Put the people who use social care first Improve services and stamp out bad practice Be an expert voice on social care Practise what we preach in our own organisation Reader Information
Document Purpose Author Audience Further copies from Copyright Inspection Report CSCI General Public 0870 240 7535 (telephone order line) This report is copyright Commission for Social Care Inspection (CSCI) and may only be used in its entirety. Extracts may not be used or reproduced without the express permission of CSCI www.csci.org.uk Internet address Carl Court DS0000018334.V260068.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 2 This is a report of an inspection to assess whether services are meeting the needs of people who use them. The legal basis for conducting inspections is the Care Standards Act 2000 and the relevant National Minimum Standards for this establishment are those for Care Homes for Older People. They can be found at www.dh.gov.uk or obtained from The Stationery Office (TSO) PO Box 29, St Crispins, Duke Street, Norwich, NR3 1GN. Tel: 0870 600 5522. Online ordering: www.tso.co.uk/bookshop This report is a public document. Extracts may not be used or reproduced without the prior permission of the Commission for Social Care Inspection. Carl Court DS0000018334.V260068.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 3 SERVICE INFORMATION
Name of service Carl Court Address Carl Court Guestland Road Cary Park Torquay Devon TQ1 3NN 01803 329203 01803 329203 Telephone number Fax number Email address Provider Web address Name of registered provider(s)/company (if applicable) Name of registered manager (if applicable) Type of registration No. of places registered (if applicable) Mr Farzand Mungar Mrs Kim Hioh Mungar Mr Farzand Mungar Care Home 15 Category(ies) of Dementia - over 65 years of age (15), Mental registration, with number Disorder, excluding learning disability or of places dementia - over 65 years of age (15), Old age, not falling within any other category (15) Carl Court DS0000018334.V260068.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 4 SERVICE INFORMATION
Conditions of registration: 1. 2. Service Users with Dementia may be admitted from 50 years age Service Users with Mental disorder may be admitted from 50 years age Date of last inspection Brief Description of the Service: Carl Court provides accommodation with personal care to older people (65 ), older people with mental disorder and older people with dementia (from the age of 50). The home is registered for up to 15 service users both male and female. Private accommodation is provided over 2 levels with their being a stair lift in place for those with mobility problems. There are 15 single rooms, 10 of which have en suite facilities. In terms of communal space, Carl Court offers 2 lounges and a dining room. There is also an accessible, secure and attractive garden. The building itself is a large detached property that is almost adjacent to a public park and located in the St. Marychurch area of Torquay. Local shops and amenities are within walking distance of the home, with Torquay town centre a bus ride away. Carl Court DS0000018334.V260068.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 5 SUMMARY
This is an overview of what the inspector found during the inspection. This inspection visit was unannounced and took place at 8.20am on the 17th November 2005. The visit was as a result of receiving an anonymous complaint in relation to staffing. The Proprietors were not present in the home on the day of this visit, although did speak to the Inspector on the telephone. Time was spent talking to staff on duty and residents. A tour of the building was conducted and some records were observed. What the service does well: What has improved since the last inspection?
Regular senior staff and full staff meetings are now being held and recorded. The Proprietors have continued to make improvements to the building with the refurbishment of the first floor bathroom being most noticeable on this occasion. Carl Court DS0000018334.V260068.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 6 What they could do better:
Care plans, risk assessments and daily records need to be more detailed in relation to a specific resident that has high care needs. This will ensure that the staff can evidence that this particular resident is receiving the appropriate level of care and monitoring following periods of illness or following falls. The most recent inspection report must be made available to residents, relatives, visiting professionals, prospective residents and staff. Staff on duty stated that feedback had been given feedback following the last inspection, but that they had not seen the last inspection report. It is particularly important that when giving feedback to staff following an inspection and making requests of staff for improvement in the care they provide, that they are able to read the inspection report in full, in order to get a full picture of what the Inspector has said. The wash hand basin, hot water tap, in the first floor bathroom (to the back of the house) needs to be put into working order, so as it is available for use by residents using this toilet. A policy informing staff on when and how to inform the CSCI of reportable events needs to be developed and made available to all staff. Staff on duty on the day of this visit, were not aware of the need to inform the CSCI of significant events. Further evidence was found of serious accidents having occurred in the home of which the CSCI were not informed. This was a recommendation at the last visit, but as this has not been completed as promised and that significant events continue to occur and the CSCI are not informed of these, this will now become a Requirement. All staff must receive training in the Protection of Vulnerable Adults from Abuse to ensure they have a good understanding of the issues in relation to abuse in care and to equip them with the skills to respond to observations of or allegations of abuse. All staff need to be trained in Dementia Care, Mental Health, Food Hygiene, Manual Handling, First Aid and Health and Safety to ensure they are equipped with the skills and knowledge to ensure the residents safety and best possible care according to current good practice. Staff supervision meetings and disciplinary meetings must be recorded and produced as evidence of these meetings having taken place and evidence that the Proprietors are dealing with issues of concern appropriately. The remainder of radiators in the home must be guarded or replaced with low surface temperature radiators in order to protect residents from being placed at risk of harm, should they fall against a radiator. Carl Court DS0000018334.V260068.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 7 The Proprietors need to continue with the home’s Quality Assurance programme, to evidence that they are seeking the views of all stakeholders and are working to improve and develop their service. Please contact the provider for advice of actions taken in response to this inspection. The report of this inspection is available from enquiries@csci.gsi.gov.uk or by contacting your local CSCI office. Carl Court DS0000018334.V260068.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 8 DETAILS OF INSPECTOR FINDINGS CONTENTS
Choice of Home (Standards 1–6) Health and Personal Care (Standards 7-11) Daily Life and Social Activities (Standards 12-15) Complaints and Protection (Standards 16-18) Environment (Standards 19-26) Staffing (Standards 27-30) Management and Administration (Standards 31-38) Scoring of Outcomes Statutory Requirements Identified During the Inspection Carl Court DS0000018334.V260068.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 9 Choice of Home
The intended outcomes for Standards 1 – 6 are: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Prospective service users have the information they need to make an informed choice about where to live. Each service user has a written contract/ statement of terms and conditions with the home. No service user moves into the home without having had his/her needs assessed and been assured that these will be met. Service users and their representatives know that the home they enter will meet their needs. Prospective service users and their relatives and friends have an opportunity to visit and assess the quality, facilities and suitability of the home. Service users assessed and referred solely for intermediate care are helped to maximise their independence and return home. The Commission considers Standards 3 and 6 the key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): 1&4 Residents, staff and prospective residents and their representatives do not have access to all of the required and up to date information about the home. The home admits only residents whose needs have been appropriately assessed and where it is felt these needs can be met. EVIDENCE: Staff on duty when asked stated that they had not been given access to the copy of the most recent inspection report (April 05). Other inspection reports were available in the office and eventually the Inspector found a copy of the most recent inspection report and gave this to staff. Staff explained that they had been given some feedback following the last inspection, but that this was mainly negative and were left with the impression that the CSCI were very concerned about the care given in this home. Reassurance was offered and the last inspection report was read through in summary. In addition, the last inspection report was not in the home’s Statement of Purpose as required and so would not be available to existing residents, prospective residents and their representatives. Carl Court DS0000018334.V260068.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 10 The staff currently employed in the home do have experience of caring for older people and were observed giving appropriate care to residents. However, it was observed at this inspection and the previous inspection, that there does appear to be a need for further formal training in relation to working with residents who have dementia and who have specific mental health needs. The Proprietor’s agreed at the last inspection that this is an identified need and would like to see their staff team receive such specific training and that they hoped to be able to provide this in the next year. However, no such training has been provided or set up to the knowledge of the staff team. Carl Court DS0000018334.V260068.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 11 Health and Personal Care
The intended outcomes for Standards 7 – 11 are: 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. The service user’s health, personal and social care needs are set out in an individual plan of care. Service users’ health care needs are fully met. Service users, where appropriate, are responsible for their own medication, and are protected by the home’s policies and procedures for dealing with medicines. Service users feel they are treated with respect and their right to privacy is upheld. Service users are assured that at the time of their death, staff will treat them and their family with care, sensitivity and respect. The Commission considers Standards 7, 8, 9 and 10 the key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): 7. Care plans, risk assessments and daily records are not sufficiently detailed for those residents with high care needs. EVIDENCE: The home have carried out some work in the development of care plans and daily care records. A newly admitted resident’s care records were seen as one sample. The records included detailed pre-admission assessments and a completed assessment upon admission. The care plan was detailed and comprehensive and gives staff the exact amount of information required to be able to offer an appropriate level of care. There is evidence of regular reviews of the care plan and detailed and positive daily care records, that evidence an appropriate level of monitoring and support is offered. Staff on duty stated that it is hoped all care plans will be updated to the same standard and in the same format as this example. A second sample of care records were viewed for a resident who is very frail and has high care needs and was the subject of the anonymous complaint received. The Inspector spent time with this resident and spoke with staff on duty (including the resident’s keyworker). It is evident that this resident is extremely frail and requires a high level of care and monitoring, due to her
Carl Court DS0000018334.V260068.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 12 physical health. This particular residents care plans need to be much more specific, detailed and a higher level of daily records must to be maintained to ensure that the home have evidence that an appropriate level of monitoring and observation are given. It was advised that specific care plans need to written in relation to food and fluid intake, seizures, UTI’s and current restraint techniques in use. In addition, there needs to be more specific and detailed recording for food and fluid intake and for every time a member of staff goes into the room to given care to the resident and to indicate when they are observing the resident. A letter of agreement has been obtained from the relative of this resident to enable the home to use a specific restraint to prevent the resident from falling from their chair. However, there is no risk assessment in place to indicate how this decision was taken, by who and how this will be monitored and reviewed. The home’s restraint policy states that “restraint can be used on when integrated in the care plan and a full risk assessment is completed….and reviewed on a weekly basis.” Whilst staff on duty were aware of the agreement to restrain this resident, it was not in use on the day of the inspection and was not seen by staff as necessary on that day. This further demonstrates that any decision reached in relation to the use of restraint, should be undertaken with all parties involved in that residents care, including staff, relatives and health care professionals. Advice was given to the home to obtain a full nursing needs assessment from a District Nurse for this resident, with a view to obtaining pressure area aids, manual handling aids and further specialist nursing advice and assistance where necessary. Carl Court DS0000018334.V260068.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 13 Daily Life and Social Activities
The intended outcomes for Standards 12 - 15 are: 12. 13. 14. 15. Service users find the lifestyle experienced in the home matches their expectations and preferences, and satisfies their social, cultural, religious and recreational interests and needs. Service users maintain contact with family/ friends/ representatives and the local community as they wish. Service users are helped to exercise choice and control over their lives. Service users receive a wholesome appealing balanced diet in pleasing surroundings at times convenient to them. The Commission considers all of the above key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): 12. The level of activities in the home needs to be improved and should be appropriate for a resident group that have mental health needs or dementia. EVIDENCE: Staff were observed with residents throughout the day of this inspection. They were observed responding to residents’ needs promptly and spending time with residents offering reassurance. Residents spoken with confirmed that staff are very caring and attentive. At the last inspection, one particular resident was observed to be walking around a lot looking for something to do, and found it very difficult to settle. At this inspection visit, she seemed very much more settled and was involved in some household tasks in order to help her feel more occupied. Staff spoken to recognise that this person needs and wants to keep busy, but feel they are still being given mixed messages about risks involved and how to appropriately occupy a resident such as this. There would be no reason why she couldn’t be more involved in domestic tasks within the home or some other form of specific and individual activity according to her needs and wishes. This issue would also be addressed in a good dementia care course and is therefore vital for all staff. As stated in the last inspection report, the home does have a displayed “activity programme”. Some records held do evidence that regular activities, entertainment and outings are arranged. Current regular activities include; a
Carl Court DS0000018334.V260068.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 14 relaxation group, music and singing, gentle exercises (run by an Occupational Therapist) and outings. There is no evaluation process and no detail of the actual activity, with the exception of the exercise classes, where records are completed by the Occupational therapist and one recent activity (dominoes) on the 20th October. This indicates that staff have now been made aware of the need for and benefits of such records and it is hoped that will continue. On the day of this inspection no activities with groups or individuals was observed. Two residents went out of the home, one with a relative, and the other independently. Given that the majority of the residents at Carl Court have very specific mental health needs, there is little in the way of innovative, good practice or specialist activity programmes that reflect individual’s needs or wishes. When talking to residents, the majority state that they spend their day reading newspapers of watching the TV and are happy to do this. However, this is not acceptable and does not reflect good practice in dementia care or mental health care. Carl Court DS0000018334.V260068.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 15 Complaints and Protection
The intended outcomes for Standards 16 - 18 are: 16. 17. 18. Service users and their relatives and friends are confident that their complaints will be listened to, taken seriously and acted upon. Service users’ legal rights are protected. Service users are protected from abuse. The Commission considers Standards 16 and 18 the key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): 18. Staff have little knowledge of Adult Protection issues. EVIDENCE: None of the staff have received any training in relation to the Protection of Vulnerable Adults from Abuse, and as such do not have sufficient knowledge and skills to recognise and deal with any observations or allegations of abuse according to local policies and procedures. Their initial induction programme does cover this topic in brief. At the last inspection, the Proprietors acknowledged that this is a shortfall, and were able to confirm at this inspection visit, that this training has now been booked with the local council in January and February 2006. However, staff on duty, had not received a date for this training as yet. The home does have Adult Protection policies in place and available to staff should it be required. A complaint was received by the CSCI since the last inspection. The complainant was anonymous. The investigation found the complaint to be not upheld. Carl Court DS0000018334.V260068.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 16 Environment
The intended outcomes for Standards 19 – 26 are: 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. Service users live in a safe, well-maintained environment. Service users have access to safe and comfortable indoor and outdoor communal facilities. Service users have sufficient and suitable lavatories and washing facilities. Service users have the specialist equipment they require to maximise their independence. Service users’ own rooms suit their needs. Service users live in safe, comfortable bedrooms with their own possessions around them. Service users live in safe, comfortable surroundings. The home is clean, pleasant and hygienic. The Commission considers Standards 19 and 26 the key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): 19 & 26. The home is generally safe, clean and well maintained. EVIDENCE: The home is comfortable, safe and well maintained with a homely feel. There is an attractive garden that is accessible and has been designed with safety in mind. The garden also contains an aviary and fishpond. The Proprietor has fitted several magnetic door holders to fire doors that are required to be held open during the day. All other fire doors were found to be closed. Four radiators in bedrooms have been replaced with low surface temperature radiators. Several bedrooms have been redecorated and recarpeted in the last year and in addition, one of the first floor bathrooms has been completely refurbished and now presents as clean, hygienic and a very pleasant environment. At the last inspection, the Proprietors reported that the continuation of the replacement of radiators to low surface temperature radiators would continue. This will be reviewed with the Proprietors at the next inspection visit.
Carl Court DS0000018334.V260068.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 17 The home has a variety of aids and adaptations fitted throughout, such as grab rails, raised toilet seats, a hoist, and a hoist to one of the three baths. There is a ramp and access to the rear of the home. The home has not met the Recommendation to obtain an assessment of the premises and facilities by a qualified person such as an Occupational Therapist. At the last inspection, the Proprietors have now agreed to obtain this assessment. This will be assessed when the Proprietors are present at the next inspection. Carl Court DS0000018334.V260068.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 18 Staffing
The intended outcomes for Standards 27 – 30 are: 27. 28. 29. 30. Service users’ needs are met by the numbers and skill mix of staff. Service users are in safe hands at all times. Service users are supported and protected by the home’s recruitment policy and practices. Staff are trained and competent to do their jobs. The Commission consider all the above are key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): 29 & 30. Residents are not fully protected by the home’s recruitment practices. The provision of a staff training programme needs to be improved. EVIDENCE: At previous inspections, staff personnel records were viewed, in particular the three most recently recruited staff. All files contained CV’s/application forms, contracts etc. All appropriate records are in place for the overseas staff that have been obtained via an agency. The Proprietors were reminded that CRB’s should have been obtained for two members of staff and stated their intention to obtain these. The Proprietor was able to demonstrate that forms for completion were in his possession, and that one member of staff had started to complete a form, but had made several mistakes. The practice of recruiting members of staff without obtaining either POVA first checks and leaving staff unsupervised without CRB’s is potentially dangerous and could place residents at risk of abuse. This could not be assessed at this visit, as the Proprietors were not present. It will be assessed at the next inspection visit. As mentioned throughout this report, there is evidence that staff require training in topics such as the care of people with dementia and mental health needs, appropriate activities and occupation of residents with dementia and mental health needs and the Protection of Vulnerable Adults from Abuse. Staff on duty stated that they have not received any training since the last inspection in April 2005, and were not aware of any training that they had
Carl Court DS0000018334.V260068.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 19 been booked in for in the coming months. Staff training records were observed and confirmed this to be the case. There is an entry in the diary for fire safety training to be provided in the next couple of weeks, but staff were not aware of this also. Some of the more experienced staff team have previously completed training in Food Hygiene, Manual Handling, First Aid and Fire Safety, but most of this now required updating. All new staff require training in First Aid, Manual Handling, Fire Safety and Food Hygiene. Carl Court DS0000018334.V260068.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 20 Management and Administration
The intended outcomes for Standards 31 – 38 are: 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. Service users live in a home which is run and managed by a person who is fit to be in charge, of good character and able to discharge his or her responsibilities fully. Service users benefit from the ethos, leadership and management approach of the home. The home is run in the best interests of service users. Service users are safeguarded by the accounting and financial procedures of the home. Service users’ financial interests are safeguarded. Staff are appropriately supervised. Service users’ rights and best interests are safeguarded by the home’s record keeping, policies and procedures. The health, safety and welfare of service users and staff are promoted and protected. The Commission considers Standards 31, 33, 35 and 38 the key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): 33 & 36. The Quality Assurance system needs to be extended and improved. The system for induction and appraisal of staff is good, however, staff are not appropriately supervised/monitored. EVIDENCE: The home’s quality assurance programme has been assessed at previous inspection visits and was found to need further work and development of surveys for staff, relatives and outside professionals and the development of an annual development plan and review process. This could not be assessed at this inspection visit, as the Proprietors (responsible for this process) were not present. It will be assessed at the next inspection. Staff receive a good induction and foundation training package when they first start work in Carl Court. They then receive bi-annual appraisals with the Proprietors. Records of both systems have been inspected on previous inspection visits and found to be detailed and up to date. At the last inspection, the Proprietors reported that they meet with staff individually
Carl Court DS0000018334.V260068.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 21 sometimes several times during a month; to discuss work related issues and abilities. They were also able to tell the Inspector about disciplinary matters that they have dealt with. However, none of these meetings with staff were previously recorded. Staff supervision meetings and disciplinary meetings must be recorded and produced as evidence of these meetings having taken place and evidence that the Proprietors are dealing with issues of concern appropriately. These records, if they are now in place, could not be accessed in the absence of the Proprietors at this visit. It will be assessed at the next visit. Carl Court DS0000018334.V260068.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 22 SCORING OF OUTCOMES
This page summarises the assessment of the extent to which the National Minimum Standards for Care Homes for Older People have been met and uses the following scale. The scale ranges from:
4 Standard Exceeded 2 Standard Almost Met (Commendable) (Minor Shortfalls) 3 Standard Met 1 Standard Not Met (No Shortfalls) (Major Shortfalls) “X” in the standard met box denotes standard not assessed on this occasion “N/A” in the standard met box denotes standard not applicable
CHOICE OF HOME Standard No Score 1 2 3 4 5 6 ENVIRONMENT Standard No Score 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2 X X 2 X N/A HEALTH AND PERSONAL CARE Standard No Score 7 2 8 X 9 X 10 X 11 X DAILY LIFE AND SOCIAL ACTIVITIES Standard No Score 12 2 13 X 14 X 15 X COMPLAINTS AND PROTECTION Standard No Score 16 X 17 X 18 2 3 X X X x X X 3 STAFFING Standard No Score 27 X 28 X 29 2 30 2 MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION Standard No 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 Score X X 2 X X 2 X X Carl Court DS0000018334.V260068.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 23 Are there any outstanding requirements from the last inspection? Yes STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS This section sets out the actions, which must be taken so that the registered person/s meets the Care Standards Act 2000, Care Homes Regulations 2001 and the National Minimum Standards. The Registered Provider(s) must comply with the given timescales. No. 1. Standard OP4 Regulation 18(1) Requirement All staff receive training in caring for residents with dementia and any specific mental health needs. In addition, all staff need to be trained in Food Hygiene, Manual Handling, First Aid and Health and Safety Care plans, risk assessments and daily care records must more detailed for highly dependent residents to evidence that care and an appropriate level of monitoring is being maintained. (previous timescale 21/7/05) An appropriate activity programme must be provided that meets the needs, abilities and wishes of residents. (previous timescale 30/9/05) All staff must receive training in the Protection of Vulnerable Adults from Abuse. Radiators must be guarded or have guaranteed low temperature surfaces POVA and enhanced CRBs must be applied for and obtained for all new staff. (previous timescale 21/7/05)
DS0000018334.V260068.R01.S.doc Timescale for action 30/03/06 2. OP7 17(1) 17/12/05 3 OP12 16(2)(m) 30/12/05 4. 5. 6. OP18 OP19 OP29 13(6) 13(4) 19(1) 28/02/06 30/12/05 30/11/05 Carl Court Version 5.0 Page 24 7. OP36 18(2) 8. OP38 37(1) 9 OP38 37(1) All staff must receive supervision 30/12/05 at least times six a year and this must be documented. (previous timescale 30/10/05) The CSCI must be informed of all 17/11/05 serious accidents, illnesses, deaths, theft and allegations of misconduct in the home (previous timescale 21/7/05) A policy should be implemented 17/12/05 for all staff in relation to the need to report all accidents, deaths, illnesses, theft and misconduct to the CSCI. RECOMMENDATIONS These recommendations relate to National Minimum Standards and are seen as good practice for the Registered Provider/s to consider carrying out. No. 1 2 3. Refer to Standard OP1 OP12 OP22 Good Practice Recommendations The most recent inspection report must be made available to existing residents, staff and all prospective residents and their representatives. Record in more detail the activities that have occurred, as well as some level of evaluation, and a list of those who participated. The registered person should be able to demonstrate that an assessment of the premises and facilities has been made by suitably qualified persons, including a qualified occupational therapist. The wash hand basin hot water tap needs to be put into working order. Continue as planned to develop the homes Quality Assurance system through questionnaires and surveys. 4. 5. OP25 OP33 Carl Court DS0000018334.V260068.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 25 Commission for Social Care Inspection Ashburton Office Unit D1 Linhay Business Park Ashburton TQ13 7UP National Enquiry Line: 0845 015 0120 Email: enquiries@csci.gsi.gov.uk Web: www.csci.org.uk
© This report is copyright Commission for Social Care Inspection (CSCI) and may only be used in its entirety. Extracts may not be used or reproduced without the express permission of CSCI Carl Court DS0000018334.V260068.R01.S.doc Version 5.0 Page 26 - Please note that this information is included on www.bestcarehome.co.uk under license from the regulator. Re-publishing this information is in breach of the terms of use of that website. Discrete codes and changes have been inserted throughout the textual data shown on the site that will provide incontrovertable proof of copying in the event this information is re-published on other websites. The policy of www.bestcarehome.co.uk is to use all legal avenues to pursue such offenders, including recovery of costs. You have been warned!
