Inspection on 18/11/08 for Highfield Care Home

This inspection was carried out on 18th November 2008.

CSCI found this care home to be providing an Adequate service.

The inspector made no statutory requirements on the home as a result of this inspection and there were no outstanding actions from the previous inspection report.

Other inspections for this house

Highfield Care Home 12/06/09

Highfield Care Home 05/09/08

Highfield Care Home 16/11/07

Similar services:

Abbey The

Snydale Care Home

Larchfield Manor

Hawkhills

Beeches The - North Yorkshire County Council

The Grove Waltham

Carentan House

Ravensworth Lodge

Extracts from inspection reports are licensed from CQC, this page was updated on 17/02/2009.

CARE HOMES FOR OLDER PEOPLE Highfield Nursing Home Highfield House Woodsetts Road North Anston Sheffield South Yorkshire S25 4EQ Lead Inspector Ivan Barker Key Unannounced Inspection 18th November 2008 09:30 X10015.doc Version 1.40 Page 1 The Commission for Social Care Inspection aims to: • • • • Put the people who use social care first Improve services and stamp out bad practice Be an expert voice on social care Practise what we preach in our own organisation Reader Information Document Purpose Author Audience Further copies from Copyright Inspection Report CSCI General Public 0870 240 7535 (telephone order line) This report is copyright Commission for Social Care Inspection (CSCI) and may only be used in its entirety. Extracts may not be used or reproduced without the express permission of CSCI www.csci.org.uk Internet address Highfield Nursing Home DS0000070354.V373206.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 2 This is a report of an inspection to assess whether services are meeting the needs of people who use them. The legal basis for conducting inspections is the Care Standards Act 2000 and the relevant National Minimum Standards for this establishment are those for Care Homes for Older People. They can be found at www.dh.gov.uk or obtained from The Stationery Office (TSO) PO Box 29, St Crispins, Duke Street, Norwich, NR3 1GN. Tel: 0870 600 5522. Online ordering: www.tso.co.uk/bookshop This report is a public document. Extracts may not be used or reproduced without the prior permission of the Commission for Social Care Inspection. Highfield Nursing Home DS0000070354.V373206.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 3 SERVICE INFORMATION Name of service Highfield Nursing Home Address Highfield House Woodsetts Road North Anston Sheffield South Yorkshire S25 4EQ 01909 566055 P/F 01909 566055 Telephone number Fax number Email address Provider Web address Name of registered provider(s)/company (if applicable) Name of registered manager (if applicable) Type of registration No. of places registered (if applicable) Selvaratnam Balaratnam Sharon Woodcock Care Home 43 Category(ies) of Dementia (12), Old age, not falling within any registration, with number other category (31) of places Highfield Nursing Home DS0000070354.V373206.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 4 SERVICE INFORMATION Conditions of registration: Date of last inspection 5th and 10th September 2008 - key, 16th September – random, 13th October - random Brief Description of the Service: Highfield Nursing Home is located on the outskirts of the village of North Anston, but within easy reach of local shops and facilities. The home is situated in large grounds, which are accessible to people in wheelchairs and those with limited mobility. Accommodation is on two levels. There is a lift to facilitate people getting between the 1st floor bedrooms and the communal rooms, which are located on the ground floor. The service provides care to older people with personal care or nursing care both physically frail or people with dementia. The fees were not identified at the time of this inspection. Highfield Nursing Home DS0000070354.V373206.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 5 SUMMARY This is an overview of what the inspector found during the inspection. The quality rating for this service is ‘1 star’. This means that the people who use this service experience adequate quality outcomes. We have reviewed our practice when making requirements, to improve national consistency. Some requirements from previous inspection reports may have been deleted or carried forward into this report as recommendations – but only when it is considered that people who use services are not being put at significant risk of harm. In future, if a requirement is repeated, it is likely that enforcement action will be taken. There are ongoing adult safeguarding cases at this site, this is a multi agency approach. As a result CSCI have made a number inspections of the site, see dates of last inspections. The owner has been required and submitted improvement plans to CSCI. This visit was to monitor compliance with previous requirements and the improvement plans. CSCI used ‘code b’ legislation at this visit, which gives CSCI powers to seize and copy documents if needed. It was not necessary to seize documents at the time of this visit. At the time of the visit however there were no people accommodated at the site, CSCI has measured compliance on the current available evidence. The persons present at the inspection were: Mr Balaratnam owner. S Wright, manager Within this site visit, which occurred over a six hour period by 2 inspectors, Ivan Barker and Janis Robinson, we toured the building, examined requirements relating to the previous inspection, examined uncompleted assessments, care plans, risk assessments, and also menus, complaint files, and staff files. All of the staff on duty at the time of this visit were interviewed about their skills, knowledge and experience of working at the home. Staff interviewed comprised of the clinical nurse manager with responsibility for training, one senior carer, two carers, two chefs and three domestics. The history of the service, telephone contacts, letters, and notifications were examined prior to the site visit. Highfield Nursing Home DS0000070354.V373206.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 6 People who use the service will be referred to within this report as ‘people’. The registered manager listed above, on page 4 of this report, is not in post, in the service. What the service does well: What has improved since the last inspection? There has been a considerable investment in the service and new documentation, new equipment and staff training has occurred. Random inspections have occurred and all requirements from all the inspections have been met. Highfield Nursing Home DS0000070354.V373206.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 7 There has been considerable dialogue between the owner, manager and ourselves, these have been positive. What they could do better: Please contact the provider for advice of actions taken in response to this inspection. The report of this inspection is available from enquiries@csci.gsi.gov.uk or by contacting your local CSCI office. The summary of this inspection report can be made available in other formats on request. Highfield Nursing Home DS0000070354.V373206.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 8 DETAILS OF INSPECTOR FINDINGS CONTENTS Choice of Home (Standards 1–6) Health and Personal Care (Standards 7-11) Daily Life and Social Activities (Standards 12-15) Complaints and Protection (Standards 16-18) Environment (Standards 19-26) Staffing (Standards 27-30) Management and Administration (Standards 31-38) Scoring of Outcomes Statutory Requirements Identified During the Inspection Highfield Nursing Home DS0000070354.V373206.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 9 Choice of Home The intended outcomes for Standards 1 – 6 are: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Prospective service users have the information they need to make an informed choice about where to live. Each service user has a written contract/ statement of terms and conditions with the home. No service user moves into the home without having had his/her needs assessed and been assured that these will be met. Service users and their representatives know that the home they enter will meet their needs. Prospective service users and their relatives and friends have an opportunity to visit and assess the quality, facilities and suitability of the home. Service users assessed and referred solely for intermediate care are helped to maximise their independence and return home. The Commission considers Standards 3 and 6 the key standards to be inspected. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): Standards 3 and 6. People who use the service experience adequate quality outcomes in this area. We have made this judgement using a range of evidence, including a visit to this service. Comprehensive documents had been produced for the assessments of people. EVIDENCE: The new manager produced the new pre assessment documents which she was to introduce. These documents were comprehensive. It was acknowledged that these documents were not completed as there were no people within the service. The manager advised that there was no plan to introduce intermediate care within the service. Highfield Nursing Home DS0000070354.V373206.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 10 Health and Personal Care The intended outcomes for Standards 7 – 11 are: 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. The service user’s health, personal and social care needs are set out in an individual plan of care. Service users’ health care needs are fully met. Service users, where appropriate, are responsible for their own medication, and are protected by the home’s policies and procedures for dealing with medicines. Service users feel they are treated with respect and their right to privacy is upheld. Service users are assured that at the time of their death, staff will treat them and their family with care, sensitivity and respect. The Commission considers Standards 7, 8, 9 and 10 the key standards to be inspected. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): Standards 7, 8, 9 and 10. People who use the service experience adequate quality outcomes in this area. We have made this judgement using a range of evidence, including a visit to this service. Comprehensive care plans and risk assessments had been produced. However these were not completed as no people were in the service, at the time of this inspection. EVIDENCE: New care plan documentation had been introduced. These plans consisted of core care plans, which are plans which are prewritten. The manager stated that individualised care plans will be added, for the plans to be personalised. The documentation also included monthly review documents, records of investigations and referral to other professionals, and health monitoring charts which included monthly blood pressure and weight charts. The risk assessment documents consisted of; Highfield Nursing Home DS0000070354.V373206.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 11 Skin assessment, Waterlow assessments, Nutritional assessments, Mental health assessments, Geriatric depression scales, Behaviour and mood monitoring records, Physical health assessments, Moving and handling assessments, Falls and risk assessment/risk management Interactions / communications with professional healthcare people, families etc Individual risk assessments for example when, smoking, dressing self etc. Once again the documents contained no information and were ready to be used when people would be admitted. All of the care staff interviewed confirmed that Sharon Wright, the new manager, had provided them with training on Care Planning. They all said that they had benefited from the training and could recognise the importance of maintaining records. Carers said the training included doing assessments to timescales so that all records were up to date, and more information on pressure care, diets, risk assessments and advisory information like the Waterlow score risk. Comments included; “Carers will now write in the care plans, not just qualified staff, we are responsible and now know how important it is to document, date and sign plans” “It’s different now, we have more input in care plans. It’s really good because we will know what is happening” All of the carers said that the clinical manager had provided them with training on the care of pressure sores. The training included a visit from the tissue viability nurse. The staff seemed clear of the action to take to prevent and respond to signs of pressure wounds, the different grades of pressure sores and how to identify the potential of pressure sores. All staff were aware of the need to record and pass on information. Comments from carers included; “We would document differently regarding pressure sores. We now know what we are looking for and would call in health professionals sooner, and ring t.v. (tissue viability services) for advice” “The training has opened my eyes, for example the tissue viability nurse telling me that sitting in a chair for long periods can cause a sore” Highfield Nursing Home DS0000070354.V373206.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 12 All of the staff interviewed knew that they could ask for the district nurse to visit and call the tissue viability nurse if they had any concerns. A training company had provided all staff with up to date moving and handling training. Carers could give examples of what they had learned and how they would now move a person differently. Staff confirmed that new moving and handling equipment had been provided. Some staff had been provided with training on end of life care, which included a talk from a macmillan nurse. Other staff said that they had been booked to attend future training events. On examination of the medication store, it was found that the store had no medication. It was advised that the medication and medication records had been transferred with the people who had been located to other homes. Within the room there were two sets of weighing scales. There was a set of scales with a seat and a set of bathroom scales. The store contained oxygen cylinders and a notice was displayed on the outside of the door, to state this fact. Highfield Nursing Home DS0000070354.V373206.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 13 Daily Life and Social Activities The intended outcomes for Standards 12 - 15 are: 12. 13. 14. 15. Service users find the lifestyle experienced in the home matches their expectations and preferences, and satisfies their social, cultural, religious and recreational interests and needs. Service users maintain contact with family/ friends/ representatives and the local community as they wish. Service users are helped to exercise choice and control over their lives. Service users receive a wholesome appealing balanced diet in pleasing surroundings at times convenient to them. The Commission considers all of the above key standards to be inspected. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): Standards 12, 13, 14 and 15. People who use the service experience adequate quality outcomes in this area. We have made this judgement using a range of evidence, including a visit to this service. New kitchen equipment had been provided. Activities were planned to occur when people were admitted to the service. EVIDENCE: The manager advised that she currently employed a carer for 22 hours per week. This individual person had experience as an activities coordinator. She intended that this individual would move into a permanent activity coordinators post when people were admitted into the home. The manager identified that she had discussed the activities planning, the programme and the record with the member of staff. She planned to introduce the programme and records when the people had been admitted. On visiting the kitchen it was established that a four-weekly menu had been created. The intention was to display the daily menu on a chalkboard within the main reception. Highfield Nursing Home DS0000070354.V373206.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 14 Within the kitchen there was a new double fridge, new dishwasher, new microwave, new crockery and the tiling had been completed. It was clear that there had been extensive cleaning to this area. Highfield Nursing Home DS0000070354.V373206.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 15 Complaints and Protection The intended outcomes for Standards 16 - 18 are: 16. 17. 18. Service users and their relatives and friends are confident that their complaints will be listened to, taken seriously and acted upon. Service users’ legal rights are protected. Service users are protected from abuse. The Commission considers Standards 16 and 18 the key standards to be. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): Standards 16 and 18. People who use the service experience adequate quality outcomes in this area. We have made this judgement using a range of evidence, including a visit to this service. The service had a complaints procedure. Safeguarding adults training made staff aware of their responsibility regarding the protection of vulnerable adults. EVIDENCE: The complaints procedure was displayed. The information within the complaints procedure was comprehensive and stated that all complaints would be dealt with within the 28 day period. However it did not list the people to speak to should the person wish to raise a complaint. The manager agreed to identify within the procedure, the persons to contact should an individual wish to make a complaint. The manager produced the complaints forms and complaints logs. The system operated consisted of a numbered logging system which was referenced to letters and other documents. Regarding adult safeguarding there are a number of ongoing adult safeguarding cases being undertaken by multi agencies. The conclusion of the adult safegaurding cases will be shared with all multi agencies and the service owner. CSCI will take into account any outcomes from these cases, see Highfield Nursing Home DS0000070354.V373206.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 16 requirement in this report requiring action by the owner. We will also continue to monitor the service. All staff had received safeguarding training. This was evidenced by the production of certificates within the training file. All of the staff interviewed confirmed that they had been provided with this training. Staff could describe the types of abuse and were clear of the action to take if they suspected abuse or an allegation was made. One carer said; “I’ve learnt a lot from all the training, like abuse. I know the different types and what to class as abuse” When requesting to see the Adult Safeguarding policies and procedure, including those provided by the contracting authorities, these could not be located. It was identified that Local Authority and other staff had been using the policies, and at the time of the inspection they could not be located. The manager stated that she would request copies of the Adult Safeguarding policies and procedures from the Local Authorities and other agencies. Highfield Nursing Home DS0000070354.V373206.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 17 Environment The intended outcomes for Standards 19 – 26 are: 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. Service users live in a safe, well-maintained environment. Service users have access to safe and comfortable indoor and outdoor communal facilities. Service users have sufficient and suitable lavatories and washing facilities. Service users have the specialist equipment they require to maximise their independence. Service users’ own rooms suit their needs. Service users live in safe, comfortable bedrooms with their own possessions around them. Service users live in safe, comfortable surroundings. The home is clean, pleasant and hygienic. The Commission considers Standards 19 and 26 the key standards to be inspected. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): Standards 19, 24 and 26. People who use the service experience good quality outcomes in this area. We have made this judgement using a range of evidence, including a visit to this service. Many new items of furniture, carpets, equipment and other items had been provided. The service was clean, well maintained, tidy and odour free for the safety and comfort of people. EVIDENCE: On touring the building it was established that there had been considerable investment in new furniture and fittings. New hospital type beds were in some of the rooms. Some new furniture including chest of drawers and wardrobes had been purchased. New sheets, pillowcases were on the beds, and new towels were found in the rooms. Within the linen rooms there were extra sheets, pillowcases, towels. New chairs had been purchased for the lounges. Highfield Nursing Home DS0000070354.V373206.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 18 There had been new carpets in some of the bedrooms. Some of the carpets along the corridor had stains. Clearly these carpets had been cleaned but the stains had remained. This was discussed with the owner who identified that he planned to replace the carpets, the following year. It was clear that a considerable amount of redecoration and extensive cleaning had occurred and the place was clean and tidy and odour free. There were mechanical hoists on both floors. All hoists had a maintenance sticker which indicated that the equipment had been serviced. The bathroom hoist had been serviced in March 08 and the 2 mobile hoists in September 08. Within the dementia unit the rooms had been renumbered. The previous Bedroom 1 had become a store room. This practice had now created the correct number of rooms indicated on the registration certificate. The service continues not to have a mechanical sluice, and staff said they would continue to soak commode pans in cleaning chemicals. We would again question that this practice involves several risks for example, the correct dilution of the chemical, possible spillage, insufficient cleansing time, etc. It would also have an effect on the staff time whilst undertaking such a long process, etc. The provision of a mechanical sluice machine would address many of these risks and free up staff time to provide care. Following Information from the Local Authority, we contacted the Fire Authority. An Officer from the Fire Authority undertook an inspection and provided a report to the owner, and sent us a copy. The Fire Authority is to revisit the service to monitor the compliance to the issues raised in the report. Highfield Nursing Home DS0000070354.V373206.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 19 Staffing The intended outcomes for Standards 27 – 30 are: 27. 28. 29. 30. Service users’ needs are met by the numbers and skill mix of staff. Service users are in safe hands at all times. Service users are supported and protected by the home’s recruitment policy and practices. Staff are trained and competent to do their jobs. The Commission consider all the above are key standards to be inspected. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): Standards 27, 28, 29 and 30. People who use the service experience adequate quality outcomes in this area. We have made this judgement using a range of evidence, including a visit to this service. The manager was able to provide evidence that staff had received a considerable amount of training which would reflect on the quality of care being delivered to the people. The staff recruitment process provided protection for the people. EVIDENCE: The number of staff employed within the home was; 3 qualified nurses which included the manager and 18 care staff. There was also an administrator, 2 kitchen, 2 domestic and 2 laundry staff. On examination of the staff rotas and examination of staff on duty, the following was established. Am shift Pm shift Night shift Plus the manager. Highfield Nursing Home 1 qualified nurse and 4 care staff. 1 qualified nurse and 4 care staff. 3 care staff. DS0000070354.V373206.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 20 However at the time of this visit there was no one resident at the home. All of the staff spoken with said that there was a good team spirit. Comments included; “It’s a good team and we all pull together” “There’s improved communication and team work, we all muck in together” The manager advised that job advertisements were placed in the local job centre to try and recruit both qualified nurses and care staff. On examination of the three staff files, all contained the required documentation including the Criminal Records Bureau and POVA (Protection of Vulnerable Adults) checks. On requesting to see the staff records, the clinical manager advised that a considerable amount of training had taken place. She provided evidence that the following training had occurred; Moving and Handling, Fire, End of life, Palliative care, Health and Safety, Basic first aid and life-support, Food hygiene, Infection control, Patient centred care, Pressure area care, Care planning, Safeguarding adults and COSHH training. The benefits of using a planner including a matrix system were discussed with the clinical manager. Highfield Nursing Home DS0000070354.V373206.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 21 Management and Administration The intended outcomes for Standards 31 – 38 are: 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. Service users live in a home which is run and managed by a person who is fit to be in charge, of good character and able to discharge his or her responsibilities fully. Service users benefit from the ethos, leadership and management approach of the home. The home is run in the best interests of service users. Service users are safeguarded by the accounting and financial procedures of the home. Service users’ financial interests are safeguarded. Staff are appropriately supervised. Service users’ rights and best interests are safeguarded by the home’s record keeping, policies and procedures. The health, safety and welfare of service users and staff are promoted and protected. The Commission considers Standards 31, 33, 35 and 38 the key standards to be inspected. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s): Standards 31, 33, 35, 36 and 38. People who use the service experience adequate quality outcomes in this area. We have made this judgement using a range of evidence, including a visit to this service. The owner, manager and staff had been actively involved in improving many areas of the service to bring it up to the expected standard. EVIDENCE: There was an acting manager in post. She advised that she had undertaken a CRB check with the Commission for Social Care Inspection. She also advised that she was yet to enrol on the NVQ 4 course, but was committed to do so. She informed us that she had 7 years experience in management and 25 years experience in care. Staff made positive comments about the manager, which included; Highfield Nursing Home DS0000070354.V373206.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 22 “Sharon is approachable, she is firm but fair” “Sharon has a way of keeping track of what staff are doing. She will keep on top of things” “I’ve found Sharon wonderful, the staff morale has improved” “Very good, she helps you” Regarding Quality Assurance, the manager identified that she had identified many areas which needed improving and had prioritised the areas and had changed many things such as documentation, and also staff perception and practices. The introduction of a quality assurance monitoring system, including the surveying of people at the service would occur, when the people were in the service. The manager advised that no personal money were being held by the service at this current time. On requesting to examine the supervision records the manager was able to evidence that since the new management had taken over the service, 1 supervision had occurred for each member of staff, On examination of the supervision records, it was established that the content of the supervision within the files were minimal. The managers attention was directed to the information within the Standard which states the areas needed to be covered in supervision. Staff spoken with confirmed that individual supervisions had commenced. All of the staff interviewed said that they had been provided with fire training so that they knew how to respond in an emergency. Regulation 26 documents, (which are a record of the registered person’s monthly visits) had been completed by the owner and copies sent to us. Other information for example: staff and financial records, requested by us had been provided by the owner. Highfield Nursing Home DS0000070354.V373206.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 23 SCORING OF OUTCOMES This page summarises the assessment of the extent to which the National Minimum Standards for Care Homes for Older People have been met and uses the following scale. The scale ranges from: 4 Standard Exceeded 2 Standard Almost Met (Commendable) (Minor Shortfalls) 3 Standard Met 1 Standard Not Met (No Shortfalls) (Major Shortfalls) “X” in the standard met box denotes standard not assessed on this occasion “N/A” in the standard met box denotes standard not applicable CHOICE OF HOME Standard No Score 1 2 3 4 5 6 ENVIRONMENT Standard No Score 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 X X 2 X X N/A HEALTH AND PERSONAL CARE Standard No Score 7 2 8 2 9 2 10 2 11 X DAILY LIFE AND SOCIAL ACTIVITIES Standard No Score 12 2 13 2 14 2 15 2 COMPLAINTS AND PROTECTION Standard No Score 16 2 17 X 18 2 2 X X X X 3 X 2 STAFFING Standard No Score 27 3 28 3 29 3 30 3 MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION Standard No 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 Score 3 x 2 x 2 x x 3 Highfield Nursing Home DS0000070354.V373206.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 24 Are there any outstanding requirements from the last inspection? No STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS This section sets out the actions, which must be taken so that the registered person/s meets the Care Standards Act 2000, Care Homes Regulations 2001 and the National Minimum Standards. The Registered Provider(s) must comply with the given timescales. No. 1 Standard OP18 Regulation 12 Requirement Action must be taken to meet any requirements as a result of the outcomes of the adult safeguarding cases. Action must be taken to meet any requirements and recommendations within the report from the Fire Authority. Timescale for action 18/01/09 2 OP19 12 18/01/09 RECOMMENDATIONS These recommendations relate to National Minimum Standards and are seen as good practice for the Registered Provider/s to consider carrying out. No. 1 2 3 Refer to Standard OP16 OP18 OP26 Good Practice Recommendations Amend the complaints procedure to clearly identify the persons to contact should people wish to make a complaint. Copies of the South Yorkshire adult safeguarding procedures to be located and accessible within the home at all times. Continue with the plan to replace further carpets in 2009. Highfield Nursing Home DS0000070354.V373206.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 25 Commission for Social Care Inspection North Eastern Region St Nicholas Building St Nicholas Street Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 1NB National Enquiry Line: Telephone: 0845 015 0120 or 0191 233 3323 Textphone: 0845 015 2255 or 0191 233 3588 Email: enquiries@csci.gsi.gov.uk Web: www.csci.org.uk © This report is copyright Commission for Social Care Inspection (CSCI) and may only be used in its entirety. Extracts may not be used or reproduced without the express permission of CSCI Highfield Nursing Home DS0000070354.V373206.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 26 - Please note that this information is included on www.bestcarehome.co.uk under license from the regulator. Re-publishing this information is in breach of the terms of use of that website. Discrete codes and changes have been inserted throughout the textual data shown on the site that will provide incontrovertable proof of copying in the event this information is re-published on other websites. The policy of www.bestcarehome.co.uk is to use all legal avenues to pursue such offenders, including recovery of costs. You have been warned!