CARE HOME ADULTS 18-65
Wensley Street 142 Wensley Street Sheffield South Yorkshire S4 8HN Lead Inspector
Shelagh Murphy Unannounced 13 July 2005 09:40 The Commission for Social Care Inspection aims to: • • • • Put the people who use social care first Improve services and stamp out bad practice Be an expert voice on social care Practise what we preach in our own organisation Reader Information
Document Purpose Author Audience Further copies from Copyright Inspection Report CSCI General Public 0870 240 7535 (telephone order line) This report is copyright Commission for Social Care Inspection (CSCI) and may only be used in its entirety. Extracts may not be used or reproduced without the express permission of CSCI www.csci.org.uk Internet address This is a report of an inspection to assess whether services are meeting the needs of people who use them. The legal basis for conducting inspections is the Care Standards Act 2000 and the relevant National Minimum Standards for this establishment are those for Care Homes for Adults 18-65. They can be found at www.dh.gov.uk or obtained from The Stationary Office (TSO) PO Box 29, St Crispins, Duke Street, Norwich, NR3 1GN. Tel: 0870 600 5522. Online ordering: www.tso.co.uk/bookshop This report is a public document. Extracts may not be used or reproduced without the prior permission of the Commission for Social Care Inspection. Wensley Street J55 S3025 Wensley Street V237982 13.7.05 UI Stage 4.doc Version 1.40 Page 3 SERVICE INFORMATION
Name of service Wensley Street Address 142 Wensley Street Sheffield S4 8HN Telephone number Fax number Email address Name of registered provider(s)/company (if applicable) Name of registered manager (if applicable) Type of registration No. of places registered (if applicable) 0114 242 4359 0114 244 8418 None South Yorkshire Housing Association Ms Iris McDonald PC Care home only 30 Category(ies) of LD - Learning disability (30) registration, with number of places Wensley Street J55 S3025 Wensley Street V237982 13.7.05 UI Stage 4.doc Version 1.40 Page 4 SERVICE INFORMATION
Conditions of registration: 1. One Service User who has a learning disability but who is also over 65 can be accommodated on the ground floor. Date of last inspection 23 March 2005 Brief Description of the Service: Wensley Street is a care home providing personal care and accommodation for thirty service users with learning disabilities. The home consists of six modern houses, each providing places for five service users. The houses are clustered together around accessible pleasant green areas. All rooms are single. The home aims to meet the needs of service users on an individual basis and encourages their independence. Service users vary in age from twenty-two years to over eighty years. This is due to the ageing of service users placed when the service began over twenty years ago. The home is situated near to shops at Firth Park and near to public transport. Wensley Street J55 S3025 Wensley Street V237982 13.7.05 UI Stage 4.doc Version 1.40 Page 5 SUMMARY
This is an overview of what the inspector found during the inspection. Shelagh Murphy carried out this unannounced inspection over five hours from 9:40 to 2:50pm. Iris McDonald, registered manager was present during the inspection. Opportunity was taken to make an inspection of the home, examine a sample of records and policies and talk to staff and residents. The inspector had the opportunity to speak to 3 staff on duty and speak in depth to 2 residents. What the service does well:
Overall, this home is very well managed, regularly monitored and continues to develop to meet the residents needs, good practice and legal requirements. The residents seemed happy and relaxed, and the staff said they were happy with the support they received. All of the residents and staff spoke highly of the manager. The residents are offered an individual service in their homes. The staff were respectful of the residents and uphold their rights. Resident’s needs had been assessed prior to a placement being offered at the home to ensure the staff could meet the individuals needs. Prospective residents and their relatives are encouraged to visit the home and meet the staff and other residents to ensure the home is the right place for them. All of the residents had individual plans, those checked were very detailed and showed the resident’s needs and future aspirations. It was clear that the staff have done a lot of work with residents and staff to develop new individual plans to meet their needs. Some of the residents have opportunities to access community day services and are supported by staff to access other community facilities such as the shops, pubs and local parks on a regular basis. Most residents are encouraged to take part in appropriate training and daily activities, which enabled them to develop skills and take part in meaningful activities. Some residents said they shopped for food and that they enjoyed the meals provided in the home. Wensley Street J55 S3025 Wensley Street V237982 13.7.05 UI Stage 4.doc Version 1.40 Page 6 The environment within the home is clean, well decorated, comfortable and homely. Most of the resident’s bedrooms are comfortable, individually personalised and furnished to meet their needs. The residents said they enjoyed living at the home. The patio areas and the gardens were generally well maintained and attractive. The service had been working within the agreed minimum staffing levels, since the last inspection. The home has a stable staff team, who know the residents very well and who have developed supportive relationships with residents and relatives. The residents said they liked the staff that worked at the home. What has improved since the last inspection? What they could do better:
The records showing that the residents care plans had been reviewed need to be updated to ensure that two reviews are taking place on an annual basis. This will ensure that the residents changing needs are identified and that the, staff know how to meet their current needs. Person centred plans need to be developed for all service users, to ensure the home is working to standards of good practice. Time will need to be allocated to the staff team to enable this to happen. Some residents needs have changed and they will need to be reassessed to ensure they are receiving appropriate levels of staff support.
Wensley Street J55 S3025 Wensley Street V237982 13.7.05 UI Stage 4.doc Version 1.40 Page 7 Staffing levels need to be reviewed as one staff working with five tenants with high support needs will ensure that the tenants opportunities, for example to access the community will be severely restricted. The team leaders need more time off the minimum staffing rotas to ensure that they have the opportunity to develop the staff team. The manager and key-workers need to review the weekly planned activities with the residents identified during the inspection, as these people have limited opportunities at the present time. The manager and team leaders need more time to increase the number of formal staff supervision and staff appraisal meetings to ensure the staff team are adequately supported and developed. The Learning Disability Award Framework (LDAF) training programme needs to be offered to all newly recruited staff to ensure they are able to meet the resident’s needs. Several of the kitchen floors in the houses were uneven and could create a trip hazard. The floor coverings in some of the kitchens needed to be replaced and remedial action needs to be taken to ensure the resident’s homes are well maintained and safe Please contact the provider for advice of actions taken in response to this inspection. The report of this inspection is available from enquiries@csci.gsi.gov.uk or by contacting your local CSCI office. Wensley Street J55 S3025 Wensley Street V237982 13.7.05 UI Stage 4.doc Version 1.40 Page 8 DETAILS OF INSPECTOR FINDINGS CONTENTS
Choice of Home (Standards 1–5) Individual Needs and Choices (Standards 6-10) Lifestyle (Standards 11-17) Personal and Healthcare Support (Standards 18-21) Concerns, Complaints and Protection (Standards 22-23) Environment (Standards 24-30) Staffing (Standards 31-36) Conduct and Management of the Home (Standards 37 – 43) Scoring of Standards Statutory Requirements Identified During the Inspection Wensley Street J55 S3025 Wensley Street V237982 13.7.05 UI Stage 4.doc Version 1.40 Page 9 Choice of Home
The intended outcomes for Standards 1 – 5 are: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Prospective service users have the information they need to make an informed choice about where to live. Prospective users’ individual aspirations and needs are assessed. Prospective service users’ know that the home that they will choose will meet their needs and aspirations. Prospective service users have an opportunity to visit and to “test drive” the home. Each service user has an individual written contract or statement of terms and conditions with the home. The Commission consider Standard 2 the key standard to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for standard(s) 2 and 4. Residents who have moved in to the service since April 2002 have all had their needs assessed by an appropriate professional prior to a placement being offered to ensure that the staff can meet the residents individual needs. Prospective residents are encouraged to visit the home and have short breaks at the home before they make a decision about living at the home. Relatives are encouraged to visit and speak to the manager and staff about their expectations. EVIDENCE: Three full needs assessments were checked and had been devised by appropriately trained professionals. The manager said that they would not accept any resident in to the home if they could not meet their needs. One prospective resident was having weekend visits to the home to “test drive” the home prior to accepting a trial placement. This ensured that the staff could also assess whether they could meet the residents needs and to ensure the other residents were happy to accept the new resident in to their home. Wensley Street J55 S3025 Wensley Street V237982 13.7.05 UI Stage 4.doc Version 1.40 Page 10 Individual Needs and Choices
The intended outcomes for Standards 6 – 10 are: 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Service users know their assessed and changing needs and personal goals are reflected in their individual Plan. Service users make decisions about their lives with assistance as needed. Service users are consulted on, and participate, in all aspects of life in the home. Service users are supported to take risks as part of an independent lifestyle. Service users know that information about them is handled appropriately, and that their confidences are kept The Commission considers Standards 6, 7 and 9 the key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for standard(s) 6, 7 and 9. All resident had detailed care plans in place, some of those checked had been reviewed on a six monthly basis others had not. Some staff and residents were encouraged to attend reviews. Other staff and residents said they had not and that team leaders carried out the reviews independently. Some staff and residents had plans to develop person centred plans but needed specific time to be allotted to carry out this activity to ensure the residents and relatives were fully involved in the process. Residents are encouraged to make decisions about their lives with assistance from staff in order to develop skill required to lead their own lives. Residents had risk assessments in place, which ensured they were able to take appropriate risks in order to lead fulfilling lifestyles. EVIDENCE: Four care plans were checked they were very detailed but there was no evidence in some plans that the resident and key workers had attended the reviews. One care plan checked had not been reviewed on a six monthly basis. The team leader said this was due to the limited time they were given off the staff rota to complete these duties.
Wensley Street J55 S3025 Wensley Street V237982 13.7.05 UI Stage 4.doc Version 1.40 Page 11 There were plans to develop person centred plans for some residents but the manager and staff said that they needed more time to ensure this work could be carried out appropriately. Two staff were trained to facilitate PCP’s but did not use this skill due to lack of resources to cover their rotas. Two residents told the inspector they were encouraged to make decisions about their lifestyles. One said they independently travelled to visit relatives when they chose to and another person said they made choices about the daily activities they attended. Four residents risk assessments were checked they clearly identified any risks involved in activities and lifestyles and the steps staff needed to take to minimise the risks to residents. Wensley Street J55 S3025 Wensley Street V237982 13.7.05 UI Stage 4.doc Version 1.40 Page 12 Lifestyle
The intended outcomes for Standards 11 - 17 are: 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. Service users have opportunities for personal development. Service users are able to take part in age, peer and culturally appropriate activities. Service users are part of the local community. Service users engage in appropriate leisure activities. Service users have appropriate personal, family and sexual relationships. Service users’ rights are respected and responsibilities recognised in their daily lives. Service users are offered a healthy diet and enjoy their meals and mealtimes. The Commission considers Standards 12, 13, 15, 16 and 17 the key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for standard(s) 12, 13, 14, 15 and 17. Some of the resident’s had regular opportunities to access age, peer and culturally appropriate activities. These residents regularly accessed community day services and leisure activities. They were also supported to access other community facilities, such as the shops, pubs and local parks etc. Others people with higher support needs had limited opportunities as they needed 1-1 staff support to facilitate this, which was not always available. The residents were supported to have appropriate relationships with their peer’s, relative’s and staff. Residents were provided with nutritious food and were encouraged to make choices about their meals. Some residents had healthy eating plans to support them to maintain a healthy weight. Some residents had ‘special’ diets to meet their individual health needs. Wensley Street J55 S3025 Wensley Street V237982 13.7.05 UI Stage 4.doc Version 1.40 Page 13 EVIDENCE: The care plans checked showed evidence that some residents had regular opportunities to access appropriate activities. Other care plans showed residents with higher support needs had very few planned activities. The staff said that in reality this was because of the level of staff support they needed to access these groups. For some tenants with high support needs their opportunities were limited as they required 1:1 or in some cases 1:2 staff support ratios to access activities and the present staffing levels were not appropriate to enable equal opportunities for all residents. These service users will need to have their needs reassessed. Some residents had a day service activity, which they paid for independently and in some cases also paid for the transport to access the groups. Some residents could afford to do this in the long term others could not. One resident told the inspector that she was bored at the home sometimes and wanted to do more craft activities. During the inspection several tenants went out with staff from day services and staff from the home. One resident went out independently to visit relatives. Some residents said they had regular contact with their relatives and they enjoyed this. The care plans checked showed that staff supported residents to maintain and in some cases develop relationships with relatives and other supporters. One menu was checked and showed that a well-balanced and nutritious diet was provided to the residents. The inspector ate lunch with the residents and they all said they had chosen their meal. The care plans contained details of the resident’s food likes and dislikes. One person had a special diet as they had diabetes. Several residents were on a healthy eating plan to help them maintain a healthy weight. Wensley Street J55 S3025 Wensley Street V237982 13.7.05 UI Stage 4.doc Version 1.40 Page 14 Personal and Healthcare Support
The intended outcomes for Standards 18 - 21 are: 18. 19. 20. 21. Service users receive personal support in the way they prefer and require. Service users’ physical and emotional health needs are met. Service users retain, administer and control their own medication where appropriate, and are protected by the home’s policies and procedures for dealing with medicines. The ageing, illness and death of a service user are handled with respect and as the individual would wish. The Commission considers Standards 18, 19, and 20 the key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for standard(s) 18, 19 and 20. The care plans checked contained detailed information about how the resident’s personal care, physical and health needs should be met by staff in order to meet their individual support needs. The resident’s health care needs were provided for with support from local G.P’s and health support teams. Some residents had specialist equipment to meet their complex physical needs. EVIDENCE: The residents care plans detailed their very individual needs in relation to the times they rose and retired, their bathing preferences, which toiletries they used and what levels of support they needed to wash, dress and included the gender of the staff they wished to support them in these tasks. The care plans checked showed that the tenant’s health needs were being met by specialist health teams in the community. The staff reported that some tenants who lived at the home had had their need assessed by an occupational therapist to ensure their hoists and wheelchairs were appropriate to meet their changing needs.
Wensley Street J55 S3025 Wensley Street V237982 13.7.05 UI Stage 4.doc Version 1.40 Page 15 None of the service users who were case tracked were able to self medicate and risk assessments were in place to confirm they had been assessed. Medication was checked and found to be stored, administered and recorded appropriately and safely. A monitoring system was in place to ensure the medication was appropriately ordered, administered and signed for. Wensley Street J55 S3025 Wensley Street V237982 13.7.05 UI Stage 4.doc Version 1.40 Page 16 Concerns, Complaints and Protection
The intended outcomes for Standards 22 – 23 are: 22. 23. Service users feel their views are listened to and acted on. Service users are protected from abuse, neglect and self-harm. The Commission considers Standards 22, and 23 the key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for standard(s) 22. A complaints procedure was in place and was in an accessible format to enable residents to access the procedure. EVIDENCE: The details in the complaints procedure met the regulations. The manager said all complaints are recorded and stored centrally. No formal complaints had been made over the last six months. The residents said they knew to complain to the manager and the staff said resident’s complaints were taken seriously and acted upon. Wensley Street J55 S3025 Wensley Street V237982 13.7.05 UI Stage 4.doc Version 1.40 Page 17 Environment
The intended outcomes for Standards 24 – 30 are: 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. Service users live in a homely, comfortable and safe environment. Service users’ bedrooms suit their needs and lifestyles. Service users’ bedrooms promote their independence. Service users’ toilets and bathrooms provide sufficient privacy and meet their individual needs. Shared spaces complement and supplement service users’ individual rooms. Service users have the specialist equipment they require to maximise their independence. The home is clean and hygienic. The Commission considers Standards 24, and 30 the key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for standard(s) 24, 25, 29 and 30. The communal areas of the houses are generally well maintained, well decorated and homely. The resident’s bedrooms are comfortable, individually personalised and furnished to meet their needs. The patio areas and the gardens were generally well maintained and attractive. A sensory garden, which is to be built by a community group, will offer a pleasant, accessible and safe area for the residents. Several residents had specialist hoists, chairs and electric wheelchairs to meet their mobility needs. The laundry areas were appropriately equipped to meet the resident’s needs. Wensley Street J55 S3025 Wensley Street V237982 13.7.05 UI Stage 4.doc Version 1.40 Page 18 EVIDENCE: All of the houses were inspected and were all well decorated, clean, tidy and homely. The residents said they liked their homes and several wanted the inspector to look at their bedrooms, which again were personalised and decorated to their individual tastes. The only issues identified were the kitchen floors, several of which needed to be recovered, but plans were in place to address this. Thee garden areas were well maintained and looked attractive. Two residents said they had watered the plants and helped to keep the gardens looking tidy. Some money has been given to the home by a relative and the staff and residents had chosen to spend the money on having a sensory garden built with access for all of the residents to enjoy. There was evidence in the residents care plans that specialist health professionals had been consulted to ensure the residents mobility needs were being met appropriately through the provision of mobility equipment. The laundry area in one house was checked and contained appropriate equipment and machinery for the staff to safely launder the service users clothing and bedding. Wensley Street J55 S3025 Wensley Street V237982 13.7.05 UI Stage 4.doc Version 1.40 Page 19 Staffing
The intended outcomes for Standards 31 – 36 are: 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. Service users benefit from clarity of staff roles and responsibilities. Service users are supported by competent and qualified staff. Service users are supported by an effective staff team. Service users are supported and protected by the home’s recruitment policy and practices. Service users’ individual and joint needs are met by appropriately trained staff. Service users benefit from well supported and supervised staff. The Commission considers Standards 35 the key standard to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for standard(s) 32,33,34,35 and 36 There is a stable staff team at the home who have a good level of understanding of how to support individual residents. The minimum staffing levels need to be reviewed, as they do not presently meet all of the residents needs. Relationships between the staff teams in the houses were good as were the relationships between the staff and the residents. Resident’s were treated with respect and spoken about positively. The staff recruitment practices protected the residents. In general the staff team said they are offered good levels of support and informal supervision from the manager and team leaders. They are not all, however, having formal supervision and appraisals to the frequency required by the standards set out in their policy. The staff said they are offered appropriate mandatory and specialist training to equip them to meet the resident’s needs. Wensley Street J55 S3025 Wensley Street V237982 13.7.05 UI Stage 4.doc Version 1.40 Page 20 EVIDENCE: Most of the staff employed at the home had worked there for some time, knew the residents well they had formed appropriate positive relationships with the residents who were relaxed in their company. Staffing levels need to be reviewed as two members of staff working with five residents with high support needs will ensure that these residents opportunities, for example to access the community will be severely restricted. None of the new staff had had completed the Learning Disability Award Framework, (LDAF) award, which will give then a recognised induction into supporting the residents who live in the home. The manager and staff said they had completed some mandatory training this year and other training had been planned for later in the year. Several staff were currently working towards the NVQ2 care award and the manager was working towards completing the NVQ4 management award. The manager said that all staff recruitment files contained details of the CRB clearances. This was necessary to ensure that the staff working at the home had been vetted appropriately. Three staff supervision records were checked, one person had been given the appropriate number of formal supervisions and an appraisal the others had not. The manager and the team leader explained that this was a resource issue as between them they had over fifty staff to support. A review of the management hour available to the team leaders and manager needs to be carried out and action taken to enable them the time to carry out these important tasks. Wensley Street J55 S3025 Wensley Street V237982 13.7.05 UI Stage 4.doc Version 1.40 Page 21 Conduct and Management of the Home
The intended outcomes for Standards 37 – 43 are: 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. Service users benefit from a well run home. Service users benefit from the ethos, leadership and management approach of the home. Service users are confident their views underpin all self-monitoring, review and development by the home. Service users’ rights and best interests are safeguarded by the home’s policies and procedures. Service users’ rights and best interests are safeguarded by the home’s record keeping policies and procedures. The health, safety and welfare of service users are promoted and protected. Service users benefit from competent and accountable management of the service. The Commission considers Standards 39, and 42 the key standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period. JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for standard(s) 39. There was a robust quality assurance monitoring system in place at the home. Residents and their relatives had been surveyed to seek their views of the service to identify the best way to develop the service in the future. EVIDENCE: Regular monthly Regulation 26 proprietors visits had been carried out to monitor the service and ensure that problems were identified and actions taken to address any issues. Copies of these were sent to the local CSCI office. The residents at the home were surveyed in February this year regarding their views of the service. Relative’s surveys had also recently been carried out to seek their views of the service. None of this information had yet been publicised but plans were in place to do this in the near future. Wensley Street J55 S3025 Wensley Street V237982 13.7.05 UI Stage 4.doc Version 1.40 Page 22 SCORING OF OUTCOMES
This page summarises the assessment of the extent to which the National Minimum Standards for Care Homes for Adults 18-65 have been met and uses the following scale. The scale ranges from:
4 Standard Exceeded 2 Standard Almost Met (Commendable) (Minor Shortfalls) 3 Standard Met 1 Standard Not Met (No Shortfalls) (Major Shortfalls) “X” in the standard met box denotes standard not assessed on this occasion “N/A” in the standard met box denotes standard not applicable
CHOICE OF HOME CONCERNS AND COMPLAINTS Standard No 1 2 3 4 5 Score x 3 x 3 x Standard No 22 23
ENVIRONMENT Score 3 x INDIVIDUAL NEEDS AND CHOICES Standard No 6 7 8 9 10
LIFESTYLES Score 2 3 x 3 x
Score Standard No 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
STAFFING Score 2 3 x x x 3 3 Standard No 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 x 2 2 2 3 x 3 Standard No 31 32 33 34 35 36 Score x 3 2 3 3 2 CONDUCT AND MANAGEMENT OF THE HOME PERSONAL AND HEALTHCARE SUPPORT Standard No 18 19 20 21
Wensley Street Score 3 3 3 x Standard No 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 Score x x 3 x x x x J55 S3025 Wensley Street V237982 13.7.05 UI Stage 4.doc Version 1.40 Page 23 Are there any outstanding requirements from the last inspection? Yes STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS This section sets out the actions which must be taken so that the registered person/s meets the Care Standards Act 2000, Care Homes Regulations 2001 and the National Minimum Standards. The Registered Provider(s) must comply with the given timescales. No. 1. Standard YA6 Regulation 15 Requirement Service user plans must be reviewed twice per year. Service users must be invited to participate in the reviews. A review of the each service users opportunities to access daily and leisure activities within the community must be carried out. Any remedial action needed must be taken to ensure that residents lead fulfilling lifestyles. A review of the staffing levels must be made to ensure there are:- 1) sufficient numbers of support staff to enable the residents to access activities within the community and 2) sufficient time for the team leaders to carry out their duties to supervises staff and review service users care plans. All newly recruited staff must complete the Learning disability Award Framework award in induction and foundation. The staff must be supervised 6 x per year. The staff must have an annual appraisal meeting. The kitchen floors must be repaired and recovered as required. Timescale for action 31.12.05 2. YA12, YA13, YA14 12, 16 31.10.05 3. YA33 18 31.12.05 4. YA35 18 31.12.05 5. 6. YA36 YA24 18 23 31.3.06 31.12.05 Wensley Street J55 S3025 Wensley Street V237982 13.7.05 UI Stage 4.doc Version 1.40 Page 24 7. YA12, YA13, YA14 12 The service users identified during the inspection must have their needs reassessed to ensure they are recieving the appropriate levels of support required to meet their needs. 31.3.06 RECOMMENDATIONS These recommendations relate to National Minimum Standards and are seen as good practice for the Registered Provider/s to consider carrying out. No. 1. 2. 3. 4. Refer to Standard YA32 YA37 YA19 YA6 Good Practice Recommendations 50 of staff must be trained to NVQ level 2 by 2005. The manager must be qualified to NVQ level 4 in care and management by 2005. All service users should have as a minimum an annual health check. All service users should have the opprotunity to devise a Person Centered Plan. Wensley Street J55 S3025 Wensley Street V237982 13.7.05 UI Stage 4.doc Version 1.40 Page 25 Commission for Social Care Inspection Ground Floor, Unit 3 Waterside Court Bold Street Sheffield, S9 2LR National Enquiry Line: 0845 015 0120 Email: enquiries@csci.gsi.gov.uk Web: www.csci.org.uk
© This report is copyright Commission for Social Care Inspection (CSCI) and may only be used in its entirety. Extracts may not be used or reproduced without the express permission of CSCI Wensley Street J55 S3025 Wensley Street V237982 13.7.05 UI Stage 4.doc Version 1.40 Page 26 - Please note that this information is included on www.bestcarehome.co.uk under license from the regulator. Re-publishing this information is in breach of the terms of use of that website. Discrete codes and changes have been inserted throughout the textual data shown on the site that will provide incontrovertable proof of copying in the event this information is re-published on other websites. The policy of www.bestcarehome.co.uk is to use all legal avenues to pursue such offenders, including recovery of costs. You have been warned!
